Likud coalition

How the list's majority voted

Final votes where the coalition majority and the opposition majority voted differently, with at least 60 members voting: the laws that were fought over.

• 20 March 2025 · Third readingLaw passedהצעת חוק מסגרות תקציב המדינה (הוראות מיוחדות לשנת 2025) (תיקוני חקיקה), התשפ"ה-2025Bill for State Budget Frameworks (Special Provisions for 2025) (legislative amendments), 2025auto64 for · 49 against · 113 of 120 votedCoalition 64:0 · Opposition 0:49Likud: majority for (30 for · 0 against)29 members spoke · 93 reservations
• 20 March 2025 · Third readingLaw passedהצעת חוק מסגרות תקציב המדינה (הוראות מיוחדות לשנת 2025) (תיקוני חקיקה), התשפ"ה-2025Bill for State Budget Frameworks (Special Provisions for 2025) (legislative amendments), 2025auto63 for · 50 against · 113 of 120 votedCoalition 63:0 · Opposition 0:50Likud: majority for (30 for · 0 against)Supporters saidautoThe economic policy is proving itself, as evidenced by the high rates of return on the stock exchange, growth in high-tech, the resilience of the shekel, and the decline in Israel's risk premium.Speakers who made this point: 2Opponents saidautoThe budget contains coalition funds amounting to billions of shekels that are not itemized, and there is concern about political agreements with budgetary implications that were not disclosed to Knesset members, such as an agreement on non-conscription in exchange for support for the budget or an agreement with the Otzma Yehudit faction related to the process of removing the Attorney General.Speakers who made this point: 210 members spoke
• 4 March 2025 · Third readingLaw passedהצעת חוק נציב תלונות הציבור על שופטים (תיקון מס' 6), התשפ"ה–2025Bill on Ombudsman for Complaints against Judges (Amendment No. 6), 2025auto56 for · 48 against · 104 of 120 votedCoalition 50:0 · Opposition 6:48Likud: majority for (29 for · 0 against)Supporters saidautoThe reason there is no commissioner is that the president (or deputy) and the Minister of Justice fail to reach agreement, leaving those entitled to file complaints hostage to a political-institutional dispute; the bill abolishes the veto right and allows appointment without dependence on such agreement.Speakers who made this point: 2Opponents saidautoThe law creates a clear political majority on the selection committee (ministers and a Knesset representative from the coalition) compared with a minority of professionals from the judiciary, thereby allowing the coalition to effectively control who will examine complaints against judges and to exert political pressure on them.Speakers who made this point: 435 members spoke · 45 reservations
• 22 January 2025 · Third readingLaw passedהצעת חוק לשכת עורכי הדין (תיקון מס' 45), התשפ"ה–2025Bill for the Bar Association (Amendment No. 45), 2025auto52 for · 45 against · 97 of 120 votedCoalition 45:0 · Opposition 7:45Likud: majority for (27 for · 0 against)Supporters saidautoThe Bar Association's budget includes exceptionally high overheads (about 40% or more) and budget surpluses of tens of millions of shekels, while the membership fees charged to lawyers are significantly higher than those charged by the Accountants Council to their counterparts, without substantive justification and without public oversight of the spending of funds.Speakers who made this point: 2Opponents saidautoThe law is an act of political revenge by the coalition and the Minister of Justice against the Bar Association and its elected chair, in response to the Bar and the representatives who supported it in democratic elections opposing the regime overhaul and refusing to follow the coalition's instructions on the Judicial Selection Committee.Speakers who made this point: 638 members spoke · 45 reservations
• 15 January 2025 · Third readingLaw passedהצעת חוק שירותי הדת היהודיים (תיקון מס' 27), התשפ"ה–2024Bill for Jewish Religious Services Law (Amendment No. 27), 2024auto46 for · 35 against · 81 of 120 votedCoalition 46:0 · Opposition 0:35Likud: majority for (23 for · 0 against)Supporters saidautoThe law is only meant to regulate in legislation an existing practice, already budgeted for 70 years, of paying salaries to local rabbis, ritual bath attendants and kessim in places without a religious council, after the Ministry of Finance determined that the existing method is not legal.Speakers who made this point: 2Opponents saidautoThe law opens a wide opening for the Minister of Religious Services to appoint additional staff positions for rabbis and officeholders without clear criteria and without needing the Ministry of Finance's consent, only consultation with it, thereby constituting a 'jobs law' for political appointments and associates.Speakers who made this point: 732 members spoke · 10 reservations
• 13 January 2025 · Third readingLaw passedהצעת חוק הביטוח הלאומי (תיקון מס' 252 והוראת שעה), התשפ"ה–2025Bill on National Insurance (Amendment No. 252 and temporary provision), 2025auto55 for · 46 against · 101 of 120 votedCoalition 55:0 · Opposition 0:46Likud: majority for (27 for · 0 against)Supporters saidautoThe burden on workers was reduced compared to the original proposal: the rate of the increase imposed on the employee was lowered to about 40% of the addition (compared to 50%), so that a low-wage worker will pay a relatively small amount per month.Speakers who made this point: 1Opponents saidautoBefore imposing a burden on citizens, the government should reduce the number of unnecessary ministries and cancel or reduce coalition funds, and only then ask the public to bear an additional burden.Speakers who made this point: 528 members spoke · 578 reservations
• 13 January 2025 · Third readingLaw passedהצעת חוק ביטוח בריאות ממלכתי (תיקון מס' 72 והוראת שעה), התשפ"ה-2025Bill on Public Health Insurance (Amendment No. 72 and temporary provision), 2025auto55 for · 46 against · 101 of 120 votedCoalition 55:0 · Opposition 0:46Likud: majority for (27 for · 0 against)Supporters saidautoThis is a purely technical amendment intended to align the collection rates with the limitations of the National Insurance Institute's computer systems, without harming the principle of easing the burden on low-income earners.Speakers who made this point: 2Opponents saidautoThe increase in the price of health insurance is an example of the government asking citizens to pay more while it continues to spend without restraint and does not cut back on itself.Speakers who made this point: 149 members spoke · 8 reservations
• 31 December 2024 · Third readingLaw passedהצעת חוק ההתייעלות הכלכלית (תיקוני חקיקה להשגת יעדי התקציב לשנת 2025) (מיסוי רווחים לא מחולקים), התשפ"ה-2024Bill Economic Streamlining (legislative amendments for achieving 2025 budget targets) (Taxation of Undistributed Profits), 2024auto59 for · 58 against · 117 of 120 votedCoalition 59:6 · Opposition 0:52Likud: majority for (31 for · 0 against)Supporters saidautoThe law creates tax equality between salaried employees, the self-employed, and company owners, so that everyone will ultimately pay a similar tax, preventing a distortion in which large capital owners pay less tax than salaried employees.Speakers who made this point: 1Opponents saidautoThe law, like other clauses in the 'Economic Efficiency Law,' is being passed as part of coalition manipulations, including secret agreements and budgetary payoffs between coalition parties that were not presented to the Knesset as required, in a manner that harms the integrity of the parliamentary process.Speakers who made this point: 218 members spoke
• 24 December 2024 · Third readingLaw passedהצעת חוק ההתייעלות הכלכלית (תיקוני חקיקה להשגת יעדי התקציב לשנת התקציב 2025) (הקפאת עדכוני מס ומס יסף), התשפ"ה-2024Bill for Economic Efficiency (legislative amendments to achieve budget targets for fiscal year 2025) (freeze on tax and Nmexes updates), 2024auto55 for · 52 against · 107 of 120 votedCoalition 55:5 · Opposition 0:47Likud: majority for (28 for · 0 against)Supporters saidautoThe additional surtax will mainly apply to very high capital income, so that those with the highest incomes will bear a significantly greater share of the economic burden, and the middle class will not be harmed.Speakers who made this point: 2Opponents saidautoThe law is effectively an additional tax increase, through freezing income tax brackets and tax credit points, which erodes the net wages of employees and self-employed alike, while the government refuses to cut coalition funds and close unnecessary ministries that could have saved tens of billions of shekels and prevented the measure.Speakers who made this point: 447 members spoke
• 24 December 2024 · Third readingLaw passedהצעת חוק הפחתת הגירעון והגבלת ההוצאה התקציבית (תיקון מס' 27), התשפ"ה-2024Bill for Reducing the Deficit and Limiting Budget Expenditure (Amendment No. 27), 2024auto62 for · 52 against · 114 of 120 votedCoalition 62:0 · Opposition 0:52Likud: majority for (29 for · 0 against)Supporters saidautoThe exceptional circumstances of the ongoing war, including extensive reserve mobilization and the launch of the operation in Lebanon, require increasing budgetary expenditure to finance security and civilian needs.Speakers who made this point: 3Opponents saidautoThe increase in the deficit and war costs is also linked to the non-conscription of the ultra-Orthodox population into the army and the labor market, which significantly raises the cost of reserve duty and harms the economy; equal conscription should be pursued before deepening the deficit.Speakers who made this point: 654 members spoke
• 24 December 2024 · Third readingLaw passedהצעת חוק תקציב נוסף לשנת הכספים 2024 (מס' 3), התשפ"ה-2024Bill Supplementary Budget for Fiscal Year 2024 (No. 3), 2024auto62 for · 52 against · 114 of 120 votedCoalition 62:0 · Opposition 0:52Likud: majority for (29 for · 0 against)Supporters saidautoThe budget addition is required due to exceptional and unforeseen circumstances: a gap in the timing of receiving American aid, the continuation and intensification of the fighting including the opening of a front in Lebanon, and the rise in interest rates on government debt.Speakers who made this point: 2Opponents saidautoThe budget is funded mainly by broad tax increases (VAT, National Insurance, health tax, freezing of tax credit points and allowances), which particularly harms the middle class and weaker families, while the deficit and public expenditure have swelled and some of the money (surpluses, budgets for non-security matters) is not being used efficiently.Speakers who made this point: 649 members spoke
• 18 December 2024 · Third readingLaw passedהצעת חוק לתיקון פקודת מס הכנסה (מס' 275), התשפ"ה–2024Bill to Amend the Income Tax Ordinance (No. 275), 2024auto60 for · 51 against · 111 of 120 votedCoalition 60:0 · Opposition 0:51Likud: majority for (28 for · 0 against)Supporters saidautoThe revised outline, which spreads the increase of the tax benefit over four years until reaching the maximum rate of 67%, achieves a proper balance between preserving the original benefit and the need for budgetary consolidation measures at this time.Speakers who made this point: 1Opponents saidautoThe government continues to distribute billions of shekels in coalition funds and maintains unnecessary ministries instead of cutting them as promised, thereby funding the harm to citizens.Speakers who made this point: 927 members spoke · 1,071 reservations
• 7 November 2024 · Third readingLaw passedהצעת חוק הנוער (שפיטה, ענישה ודרכי טיפול) (תיקון מס' 25 - הוראות שעה), התשפ"ד–2024Bill on the Youth Law (Adjudication, Punishment and Treatment Methods) (Amendment No. 25 - Temporary Provisions), 2024auto55 for · 33 against · 88 of 120 votedCoalition 55:0 · Opposition 0:33Likud: majority for (26 for · 0 against)Supporters saidautoThe bill includes procedural protections for the minor (probation report, follow-up hearing, limiting detention periods to the minimum required) and balances the need to protect the public against the rights of the minor.Speakers who made this point: 2Opponents saidautoThe law harms children's basic rights (such as the right to detention as a last resort, limiting detention periods, being brought before a judge, and detention separate from adults) and contradicts the principles of international law, which seek to rehabilitate children rather than punish them as adults.Speakers who made this point: 117 members spoke · 18 reservations
• 7 November 2024 · Third readingLaw passedהצעת חוק גירוש משפחות מחבלים, התשפ"ה–2024Bill on the Expulsion of Families of Terrorists, 2024auto61 for · 41 against · 102 of 120 votedCoalition 60:0 · Opposition 1:41Likud: majority for (27 for · 0 against)Supporters saidautoThe law creates effective deterrence against terrorists and their families, since the knowledge that family members will be expelled may dissuade potential terrorists from carrying out attacks and even cause families to prevent their children from carrying them out.Speakers who made this point: 7Opponents saidautoThis is collective punishment that harms innocent people (children, women, the elderly) who did not commit any offense, contrary to the basic principle of individual criminal responsibility and the Torah principle that children are not punished for the sins of their fathers.Speakers who made this point: 723 members spoke · 6 reservations
• 5 November 2024 · Third readingLaw passedהצעת חוק איסור העסקת עובדי הוראה ושלילת תקציב ממוסדות חינוך עקב הזדהות עם מעשה טרור או עם ארגון טרור (תיקוני חקיקה), התשפ"ה–2024Bill for the Prohibition of Employment of Teaching Staff and Deprivation of Budget from Educational Institutions due to Identification with a Terrorist Act or Terrorist Organization (legislative amendments), 2024auto55 for · 45 against · 100 of 120 votedCoalition 55:0 · Opposition 0:45Likud: majority for (28 for · 0 against)Supporters saidautoTeachers who support or identify with terrorism endanger defenseless students and exploit their position to incite and recruit them to terrorism, and therefore must not be allowed to continue teaching.Speakers who made this point: 2Opponents saidautoThe law grants the Director-General of the Ministry of Education, who is a political appointee, broad and nearly unlimited discretion to dismiss teachers and withhold budgets without sufficient judicial oversight, which could be used for political persecution and could harm any future government.Speakers who made this point: 439 members spoke · 63 reservations
• 29 September 2024 · Third readingLaw passedהצעת חוק תקציב נוסף לשנת הכספים 2024 (מס' 2), התשפ"ד-2024Bill for a Supplementary Budget for the Financial Year 2024 (No. 2), 2024auto56 for · 52 against · 108 of 120 votedCoalition 56:0 · Opposition 0:52Likud: majority for (28 for · 0 against)Supporters saidautoThe budget is required for existential funding of extended evacuation and alternative housing for evacuated residents, hosting hostage families, and support for reservists and victims of 7 October, and therefore it should be approved rather than abandoning these populations.Speakers who made this point: 4Opponents saidautoThe Moody's report, which downgraded Israel's credit rating by two levels to its lowest level since the 1990s, explicitly indicates that the reasons are not only the war but also governmental failure: the absence of an exit strategy, advancing the draft-evasion law, the failure to appoint judges and a president to the Supreme Court, and the weakening of state institutions.Speakers who made this point: 760 members spoke
• 29 September 2024 · Third readingLaw passedהצעת חוק הפחתת הגירעון והגבלת ההוצאה התקציבית (תיקון מס' 26), התשפ"ד-2024Bill for the Reduction of the Deficit and Limitation of Budget Expenditure (Amendment No. 26), 2024auto58 for · 52 against · 110 of 120 votedCoalition 58:0 · Opposition 0:52Likud: majority for (29 for · 0 against)Supporters saidautoThe budget must be increased to fund the expansion of the support package for reserve duty soldiers and their families, who bear a heavy burden, and the prolongation of the war requires additional resources for them.Speakers who made this point: 4Opponents saidautoMoody's double credit rating downgrade, to the lowest level since the 1990s, stems mainly from the government's failed economic and political conduct — including the delay of the 2025 budget, failure to appoint judges and a president to the Supreme Court, the draft-evasion law, and lack of a war exit strategy — and not only from the war itself.Speakers who made this point: 1360 members spoke · 386 reservations
• 6 August 2024 · Third readingLaw passedהצעת חוק הפצת שידורים באמצעות תחנות שידור ספרתיות (תיקון מס' 7 - הוראת שעה), התשפ"ד–2024Bill on Broadcasting Distribution via Digital Broadcasting Stations (Amendment No. 7 - temporary provision), 2024auto41 for · 31 against · 72 of 120 votedCoalition 41:0 · Opposition 0:31Likud: majority for (23 for · 0 against)Supporters saidautoThe law diversifies the communications market and allows small and micro channels, which were discriminated against compared to the large channels, to be included in the Idan Plus platform under fairer conditions.Speakers who made this point: 3Opponents saidautoIt is inappropriate and immoral to devote a special Knesset session during a war and security emergency, during recess, to legislation unrelated to the war, the hostages, or the needs of citizens, but rather to the political survival of the coalition.Speakers who made this point: 1531 members spoke · 88 reservations
• 25 July 2024 · Third readingLaw passedהצעת חוק הרשות השנייה לטלוויזיה ורדיו (תיקון מס' 49), התשפ"ד-2024Bill for the Second Authority for Television and Radio (Amendment No. 49), 2024auto44 for · 37 against · 81 of 120 votedCoalition 44:0 · Opposition 0:37Likud: majority for (24 for · 0 against)4 members spoke · 29 reservations
• 24 July 2024 · Third readingLaw passedהצעת חוק התקשורת (בזק ושידורים) (תיקון מס' 79), התשפ"ד–2024Bill Communications (Telecommunications and Broadcasting) (Amendment No. 79), 2024auto60 for · 53 against · 113 of 120 votedCoalition 60:0 · Opposition 0:53Likud: majority for (29 for · 0 against)Supporters saidautoThe law protects the freedom of choice and autonomy of citizens, mainly in the ultra-Orthodox public, to consume communication services in accordance with their way of life and beliefs, without imposing this on others.Speakers who made this point: 6Opponents saidautoThe law creates and entrenches a forceful and unregulated monopoly held by a private body (the 'Rabbis' Committee for Communications Affairs'), allowing it to control the communication consumption patterns of hundreds of thousands of citizens and prevent competition, without any criteria, transparency, or prohibition on receiving payment for blocking being established.Speakers who made this point: 744 members spoke · 147 reservations
• 1 April 2024 · Third readingLaw passedהצעת חוק לתיקון פקודת העיריות (מס' 157) , התשפ"ד–2024Bill to Amend the Municipalities Ordinance (No. 157), 2024auto47 for · 30 against · 77 of 120 votedCoalition 47:0 · Opposition 0:30Likud: majority for (23 for · 0 against)Supporters saidautoThis is a step of distributive justice intended to strengthen the economic resilience of local authorities that do not have sufficient commercial and employment areas yielding high property tax revenue, so that every resident receives what is due to them regardless of their place of residence.Speakers who made this point: 1Opponents saidautoThe law is part of a trend of de facto annexation of the West Bank territories, which breaks down the issue of annexation into hundreds of laws and seeks to apply Israeli law to the territories in violation of international law, while creating a reality in which Jewish residents enjoy the rights of a democratic state while non-Jewish residents live under military rule.Speakers who made this point: 528 members spoke · 11 reservations
• 18 March 2024 · Third readingLaw passedהצעת חוק התכנון והבנייה (תיקון מס' 152), התשפ"ד-2024Bill on Planning and Construction (Amendment No. 152), 2024auto50 for · 35 against · 85 of 120 votedCoalition 50:6 · Opposition 0:29Likud: majority for (25 for · 0 against)Supporters saidautoIt must be ensured that the Minister of Agriculture has representatives on all planning institutions, as has been the practice for 60 years, since the field of agriculture requires unique expertise that other representatives do not have, and its absence could harm agriculture and rural development.Speakers who made this point: 1Opponents saidautoPlanning in the country discriminates against the Arab population, which is excluded from the decisions of the planning institutions and does not receive adequate representation in them, while the proposed law only worsens this situation by adding factors that do not act in its favor.Speakers who made this point: 320 members spoke · 11 reservations
• 18 March 2024 · Third readingLaw passedהצעת חוק התכנון והבנייה (תיקון מס' 151), התשפ"ד-2024Bill on Planning and Construction (Amendment No. 151), 2024auto50 for · 37 against · 87 of 120 votedCoalition 50:6 · Opposition 0:31Likud: majority for (25 for · 0 against)Supporters saidautoThere is a need to restore the Ministry of Agriculture's representation on the planning institutions and to anchor the place of a representative of the Ministry of the Negev, Galilee and National Resilience following the transfer of authorities between them.Speakers who made this point: 2Opponents saidautoThe law constitutes improper politicization of the planning institutions, which will serve the political and sectoral interests of the coalition parties (Otzma Yehudit and Religious Zionism) instead of professional considerations and the public interest, and will harm the balance between preservation and development.Speakers who made this point: 535 members spoke · 26 reservations
• 13 March 2024 · Third readingLaw passedהצעת חוק תשלום מיוחד לשם השגת יעדי התקציב (הוראת שעה – חרבות ברזל), התשפ"ד–2024Bill Special Payment for Achieving Budget Targets (temporary provision – Swords of Iron), 2024auto63 for · 55 against · 118 of 120 votedCoalition 63:12 · Opposition 0:43Likud: majority for (31 for · 0 against)Supporters saidautoThe budget is necessary to continue managing the war, compensating reserve soldiers, and funding the security and civilian expenses stemming from the fighting.Speakers who made this point: 4Opponents saidautoThe budget is allocated disproportionately in favor of coalition and sectoral funds (yeshivas, non-core Haredi education, ministries of Jewish identity and heritage) instead of being reduced and focused on the needs of the war and the affected populations.Speakers who made this point: 1848 members spoke · 74 reservations
• 13 March 2024 · Third readingLaw passedהצעת חוק הקפאה והפחתה של דמי הבראה בשנת 2024 לשם תקצוב הטבות לחיילי מילואים, התשפ"ד-2024Bill Freeze and Reduction of Recuperation Pay in 2024 for the Purpose of Budgeting Benefits for Reserve Soldiers, 2024auto63 for · 53 against · 116 of 120 votedCoalition 63:10 · Opposition 0:43Likud: majority for (31 for · 0 against)Supporters saidautoProviding benefits to reserve soldiers following the war is an urgent and justified need, and since the existing budget is insufficient for this, an additional funding source must be found from all employees in the economy.Speakers who made this point: 1Opponents saidautoThe overall budget, which includes this bill, contains extensive cuts to social services alongside increased budgets for coalition and sectoral funds, and therefore there is no justification for imposing an additional burden on the general public by harming recreation pay while there is no corresponding cut elsewhere.Speakers who made this point: 548 members spoke · 17 reservations
• 13 March 2024 · Third readingLaw passedהצעת חוק ביטוח בריאות ממלכתי (תיקון מס' 69 והוראת שעה), התשפ"ד-2024Bill National Health Insurance (Amendment No. 69 and temporary provision), 2024auto63 for · 55 against · 118 of 120 votedCoalition 63:12 · Opposition 0:43Likud: majority for (31 for · 0 against)Supporters saidautoIncreasing the health insurance contribution rate is required as a necessary funding source for the national mental health program, which suffered from years of budgetary neglect and worsened as a result of the war.Speakers who made this point: 1Opponents saidautoThis is an additional tax increase on the public at a time when the government is simultaneously increasing coalition funds and unnecessary ministry budgets, so there is no justification for imposing an additional economic burden on citizens specifically during this period.Speakers who made this point: 1154 members spoke · 27 reservations
• 13 March 2024 · Third readingLaw passedהצעת חוק הביטוח הלאומי (תיקון מס' 244 והוראת שעה), התשפ"ד-2024Bill National Insurance (Amendment No. 244 and temporary provision), 2024auto63 for · 55 against · 118 of 120 votedCoalition 63:12 · Opposition 0:43Likud: majority for (31 for · 0 against)Supporters saidautoThe amendment is part of a broad and necessary balancing plan required to finance the security and civilian expenses stemming from the war, and therefore it should be approved as part of the war budget.Speakers who made this point: 2Opponents saidautoIn the midst of a difficult war, this is not the time to increase the tax burden on the public (including freezing the average wage, which in practice increases insurance payments), while the government does not save on unnecessary expenses and increases coalition funds and budgets for certain sectors.Speakers who made this point: 748 members spoke · 11 reservations
• 13 March 2024 · Third readingLaw passedהצעת חוק תקציב נוסף לשנת הכספים 2024, התשפ"ד-2024Bill Supplementary Budget for the 2024 Fiscal Year, 2024auto62 for · 55 against · 117 of 120 votedCoalition 62:12 · Opposition 0:43Likud: majority for (30 for · 0 against)Supporters saidautoThis is a necessary and responsible budget in wartime, dramatically increasing the defense budget and civilian expenditures stemming from the war, while maintaining fiscal responsibility and taking balanced consolidation measures to preserve financial confidence and prevent economic deterioration.Speakers who made this point: 1Opponents saidautoThe budget includes billions of shekels in coalition funds (approximately 5.7–13.6 billion NIS) that were embedded in the budget base specifically during wartime, directed toward political sectors and invented ministries (such as the Ministry of Settlement, the Ministry of Heritage, the Ministry of Tradition, and the Authority for Jewish Identity) instead of toward the needs of the fighting and the home front.Speakers who made this point: 1662 members spoke
• 13 March 2024 · Third readingLaw passedהצעת חוק הפחתת הגירעון והגבלת ההוצאה התקציבית (תיקון מס' 25), התשפ"ד-2024Bill Deficit Reduction and Limitation of Budget Expenditure (Amendment No. 25), 2024auto62 for · 55 against · 117 of 120 votedCoalition 62:12 · Opposition 0:43Likud: majority for (30 for · 0 against)Supporters saidautoThis is a necessary war budget that provides a top-priority response for reservists, evacuees, security, and rehabilitation of the home front, and therefore it should be approved despite criticism of other parts of it.Speakers who made this point: 3Opponents saidautoThe budget includes an unprecedented sum of coalition funds (over 5-6 billion shekels) and unnecessary government ministries (an additional approximately 1.2 billion shekels), directed toward political partners rather than toward the needs of the war or the general public, reflecting unprecedented disregard during wartime.Speakers who made this point: 1358 members spoke · 224 reservations
• 28 February 2024 · Third readingLaw passedהצעת חוק שירות ביטחון (תיקון מס' 26 – הוראת שעה – חרבות ברזל), התשפ"ד-2024Bill on Security Service (Amendment No. 26 - temporary provision - Iron Swords), 2024auto44 for · 30 against · 74 of 120 votedCoalition 44:0 · Opposition 0:30Likud: majority for (21 for · 0 against)Supporters saidautoThe IDF needs the continued service of reservists in combat and combat-support roles in order to maintain operational fitness during the ongoing war, and their mass release could harm combat capability.Speakers who made this point: 2Opponents saidautoThe law deepens the inequality in sharing the burden, since it only burdens the public that already serves (reservists and regular soldiers) while the ultra-Orthodox public continues to be broadly exempt from service, with no corresponding change in the conscription law.Speakers who made this point: 2436 members spoke · 13 reservations

Earlier →

Party split → · All votes of the list →

Members · Members (44 all time)

• Yuli Yoel Edelstein
• Amir Ohana
• Avichay Avraham Buaron
• David Bitan
• Boaz Bismuth
• Nir Barkat
• Sasson Sassi Guetta
• Tally Gotliv
• May Golan
• Gila Gamliel
• Avi Dicter
• Galit Distel Atbaryan
• Eli Dallal
• Shalom Danino
• Amit Halevi
• Nissim Vaturi
• Ofir Katz
• Israel Katz
• Yariv Levin
• Hanoch Dov Milwidsky
• Tsega Melaku
• Benjamin Netanyahu
• Moshe Saada
• Afef Abed
• Etty Hava Atia
• Moshe Passal
• Ariel Kallner
• Shlomo Karhi
• Eliyahu Revivo
• Kathrin Shitrit
• Osher Shkalim