Government bill · 20th Knesset · published as law 20 March 2016
חוק הכניסה לישראל (תיקון מס' 26), התשע"ו-2016Law on Entry into Israel (Amendment No. 26), 2016 · automatic translation · suggest a correction
Status: התקבלה בקריאה שלישית
Topics: Aliyah, citizenship and immigration* · * from the Knesset's official law classification
Official summary of the law (Knesset)
The Entry into Israel Law (Amendment No. 26), 2016, was passed in its second and third readings on 14 March 2016. The Law establishes increased penalties for offenses of harboring and employing illegal residents, and also establishes new punitive and administrative tools against those who harbor illegal residents: 1. As a temporary provision for two years, the Law sets minimum fines. 2. Offenses of harboring and transporting under aggravating circumstances are established, for which the maximum prison sentence will be four years instead of two years, and the maximum fine will be 226,000 NIS instead of 75,000 NIS. The aggravating circumstances are harboring or employing more than one illegal resident, harboring or employing an illegal resident for a period of two consecutive days or more, and harboring an illegal resident with the intent to employ them. 3. Police district commanders are authorized to issue a use-restriction order for a place for which they had reasonable grounds to believe is used for committing an offense of harboring or employing an illegal resident, and reasonable grounds to believe the place will continue to be used for such an offense if its use is not restricted, for a period of up to 30 days. An application for reconsideration may be filed against such an order, which must be answered within 72 hours. 4. Courts may issue additional use-restriction orders for the place for additional periods of up to 60 days, and after an indictment is filed, courts may issue use-restriction orders until the end of proceedings. 5. Courts will also be granted the authority to issue orders suspending the business license of a person suspected of committing an offense of harboring or employing an illegal resident, if there are reasonable grounds for concern that continuing the business poses a danger to public peace or security, or may facilitate the commission of a similar offense. The validity of such an order, before an indictment is filed, shall not exceed 30 days, and after an indictment is filed, the court may extend the order until the end of proceedings or an earlier date it sets. In addition, the court may also, in addition to any penalty imposed, impose a penalty of suspending a business license or permit for a period of up to six months. An additional tightening applies to both the harboring and employment offenses, and the offense of transporting illegal residents. If a person is convicted of one of these offenses, the Law requires the court to order forfeiture of profits from committing the offense. In addition, the Law clarifies that for purposes of the employment offense, the definition of employer also includes an actual employer, a manpower broker, and a manpower contractor. Another amendment to the Law concerns the offense of transporting illegal residents, established as a temporary provision, and the Law extends it for an additional two years, until 31 March 2018.
automatic translation · suggest a correction
Hebrew original
חוק הכניסה לישראל (תיקון מס' 26), התשע"ו-2016, התקבל בקריאה השנייה ובקריאה השלישית ביום ד' באדר ב' התשע"ו (14 במרס 2016). החוק קובע החמרה בענישה על עבירות של הלנה והעסקה של שוהים בלתי חוקיים, וכן קובע כלים ענישתיים ומנהליים חדשים נגד מלינים ושוהים בלתי חוקיים: 1. כהוראת שעה לשנתיים, נקבעו בחוק קנסות מינימום. 2. נקבעו עבירות של הלנה והסעה בנסיבות מחמירות, שבהן עונש המאסר המרבי יעמוד על ארבע שנים במקום שנתיים, והקנס המרבי יעמוד על 226 אלף ש"ח במקום 75 אלף ש"ח. הנסיבות המחמירות הן הלנה או העסקה של יותר משב"ח אחד, הלנה או העסקה של שב"ח לתקופה של יומיים רצופים או יותר, וכן הלנת שב"ח במטרה להעסיקו. 3. הסמכת מפקדי מחוזות במשטרה להוציא צו הגבלת שימוש למקום שהיה להם יסוד סביר להניח כי הוא משמש לביצוע עבירה של הלנה או העסקה של שב"ח, וכן יסוד סביר להניח שהמקום ימשיך לשמש לביצוע עבירה כזו אם לא יוגבל השימוש במקום, לתקופה של עד 30 ימים. על צו כזה ניתן להגיש בקשה לעיון חוזר, שעליה יש להשיב בתוך 72 שעות. 4. בתי המשפט יוכלו להוציא צווי הגבלת שימוש במקום לתקופתו נוספות של עד 60 ימים, ולאחר הגשת כתב אישום יהיו בתי המשפט רשאים להוציא צווי הגבלת שימוש עד תום ההליכים. 5. לבתי המשפט תינתן גם הסמכות להוציא צווים להתליית רישיון עיסוק של של מי שחשוד בביצוע עבירה של הלנה או העסקה של שב"ח, אם מתקיים יסוד סביר לחשש שהמשך העיסוק הווה סכנה לשלום הציבור או לביטחונו, או עלול להקל על ביצוע עבירה דומה. תוקפו של צו כזה, לפני הגשת כתב אישום, לא יעלה על 30 ימים, ולאחר הגשת כתב האישום יוכל בית המשפט להוציא את הצו עד תום ההליכים או עד למועד מוקדם יותר שיקבע. בנוסף, בית המשפט יוכל גם, בנוסף לכל עונש שיטיל, להטיל עונש של התליית רישיון או היתר עיסוק לתקופה של עד שישה חודשים. החמרה נוספת, הנוגעת הן לעבירות ההלנה והעסקה, והן לעבירת ההסעה של שוהים בלתי חוקיים. אם יורשע אדם באחת מעבירות אלה, החוק מחייב את בית המשפט להורות על חילוט רווחיו מביצוע העבירה. בנוסף, החוק מבהיר כי לעניין עבירת ההעסקה, הגדרת המעסיק כוללת גם מעסיק בפועל, מתווך כוח אדם וקבלן כוח אדם. תיקון נוסף בחוק נוגע לעבירת ההסעה של שוהים בלתי חוקיים, הקבועה כהוראת שעה, והחוק מאריך אותה בשנתיים נוספות, עד יום ט"ו בניסן התשע"ח (31 במרס 2018).
Sponsors
Mordhay Yogev, Yakov Margi, Nissan Slomiansky, Shuli Moalem-Refaeli
Readings
- 22 February 2016 · First reading · להעביר את הצעת החוק לוועדההצעת חוק הכניסה לישראל (תיקון מס' 26), התשע"ו-2016Bill on Entry into Israel (Amendment No. 26), 2016autoBill passed first reading35 for · 12 against
- 14 March 2016 · Third reading · אישור החוקהצעת חוק הכניסה לישראל (תיקון מס' 26), התשע"ו-2016Bill on Entry into Israel (Amendment No. 26), 2016autoLaw passed44 for · 16 against
What was said in the plenum
The bill increases the punishment for Israelis who employ, harbor or transport Palestinian residents staying in Israel illegally, and extends a temporary provision concerning their transportation, while granting new powers to the police and courts such as closing workplaces and forfeiting profits. The debate revolves around whether increasing punishment will indeed help combat terrorism and prevent the employment of illegal residents, versus claims that this is a harmful, disproportionate and ineffective law that harms families and does not address the roots of the problem.
automatic translation · suggest a correction
Hebrew original
הצעת החוק מחמירה את הענישה על ישראלים המעסיקים, מלינים או מסיעים תושבים פלסטינים השוהים בישראל שלא כדין (שב״חים), ומאריכה הוראת שעה הנוגעת להסעתם, תוך מתן סמכויות חדשות למשטרה ולבתי המשפט כמו סגירת מקומות עבודה וחילוט רווחים. הדיון נסב סביב השאלה האם החמרת הענישה אכן תסייע במלחמה בטרור ותמנע העסקת שוהים בלתי חוקיים, מול טענות שמדובר בחוק פוגעני, בלתי מידתי ובלתי אפקטיבי שפוגע במשפחות ואינו מטפל בשורשי הבעיה.
Arguments for
- Most perpetrators of recent terror attacks were illegal residents, and therefore there is an urgent need to toughen the handling of the phenomenon in order to protect the security of Israeli citizens.Gilad Erdan (Likud), Mordhay Yogev (Jewish Home)
- The existing level of punishment for employers, harborers and transporters of illegal residents is too low and does not create deterrence, and therefore it should be increased, with liability also imposed on entrepreneurs and corporations that profit from such employment.
- Israeli employers who exploit illegal residents for financial profit should be punished severely, since they hold the power in the relationship and are responsible for creating the security risk.Omer Barlev (Zionist Union), Mordhay Yogev (Jewish Home)
- The law should be supported in order to give the police and enforcement authorities additional tools to deal with the phenomenon, while also expressing support for increasing the number of work permits for Palestinians.
Arguments against
- This is a draconian and disproportionate law, imposing severe punishments mechanically and predetermined (such as doubling the sentence for harboring two people or two days instead of one person or one day), and denying judges discretion to examine the circumstances of the offense.
- The law severely harms mixed families and people married to spouses from the territories whose status has not been regularized, and may punish spouses, children and parents for the mere fact of maintaining family life, regardless of any criminal or security-related intent.Osama Saadi (Joint List), Aida Touma Sliman (Joint List), Abd Al Hakeem Haj Yahya (Joint List), Revital Swid (Zionist Union), Yousef Jabareen (Joint List)
- The root of the phenomenon is economic and social distress stemming from the occupation, and therefore the real solution is political - establishing an independent Palestinian state and improving the economy of the territories - rather than increasing punishment, which will not solve the problem.Nachman Shai (Zionist Union), Aida Touma Sliman (Joint List), Masud Ganaim (Joint List), Abd Al Hakeem Haj Yahya (Joint List), Zouheir Bahloul (Zionist Union), Talab Abu Arar (Joint List), Tamar Zandberg (Meretz), Dov Khenin (Joint List), Stav Shaffir (Zionist Union), Abdullah Abu Maaruf (Joint List)
- This is an empty law that will not prevent terrorism or change reality, but only constitutes "throwing sand in the public's eyes" and a forceful security response that has already proven to fail in the past.Nachman Shai (Zionist Union), Masud Ganaim (Joint List), Abd Al Hakeem Haj Yahya (Joint List), Omer Barlev (Zionist Union), Revital Swid (Zionist Union), Esawi Frej (Meretz), Eyal Ben Reuven (Zionist Union), Yehiel Hilik Bar (Zionist Union)
- Most illegal residents are merely seeking a livelihood and do not pose a security threat, and therefore there is no justification for imposing such severe and sweeping punishment on them and their employers.
Who spoke (21)
| Member | Faction | Readings | Speeches | In the final vote |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gilad Erdan | Likud coalition | First reading, Third reading | 6 | for |
| Nachman Shai | Zionist Union opposition | First reading, Third reading | 2 | no record |
| Osama Saadi | Joint List opposition | First reading, Third reading | 8 | against |
| Aida Touma Sliman | Joint List opposition | First reading, Third reading | 3 | against |
| Masud Ganaim | Joint List opposition | First reading | 1 | against |
| Abd Al Hakeem Haj Yahya | Joint List opposition | First reading, Third reading | 4 | against |
| Omer Barlev | Zionist Union opposition | First reading, Third reading | 4 | no record |
| Zouheir Bahloul | Zionist Union opposition | First reading | 4 | no record |
| Talab Abu Arar | Joint List opposition | First reading, Third reading | 4 | against |
| Yoav Ben Tzur | Shas coalition | Third reading | 2 | for |
| Revital Swid | Zionist Union opposition | Third reading | 5 | no record |
| Ahmad Tibi | Joint List opposition | Third reading | 3 | against |
| Tamar Zandberg | Meretz opposition | Third reading | 5 | against |
| Esawi Frej | Meretz opposition | Third reading | 6 | against |
| Eyal Ben Reuven | Zionist Union opposition | Third reading | 2 | no record |
| Dov Khenin | Joint List opposition | Third reading | 1 | against |
| Yehiel Hilik Bar | Zionist Union opposition | Third reading | 2 | no record |
| Stav Shaffir | Zionist Union opposition | Third reading | 3 | no record |
| Abdullah Abu Maaruf | Joint List opposition | Third reading | 1 | against |
| Yousef Jabareen | Joint List opposition | Third reading | 4 | against |
| Mordhay Yogev | Jewish Home coalition | Third reading | 1 | for |
An automatic summary of the plenum transcripts: the debate on the bill at every reading it was voted on. Arguments are given as the speakers made them; this is not an assessment. The list of speakers comes from the transcript, without a model. Transcripts of the sittings: 1, 2
Reservations to the second reading
41 reservations were filed: proposed changes to the text the committee brought to the second and third reading.
The reservations are intended to soften, narrow or delete punitive provisions, oversight powers and restriction orders in the bill, to change commencement dates and various restriction periods, and to add exceptions to protect family members from the law's restrictions.
automatic translation · suggest a correction
Hebrew original
ההסתייגויות נועדו לרכך, לצמצם או למחוק הוראות ענישה, סמכויות פיקוח וצווי הגבלה שבהצעת החוק, לשנות מועדי תחילה ותקופות הגבלה שונות, ולהוסיף סייגים להגנת בני משפחה ממגבלות החוק.
By faction
- Joint List opposition · 30 reservations · 13 members
- Meretz opposition · 8 reservations · 5 members
- Zionist Union opposition · 5 reservations · 24 members
A joint reservation counts for every faction whose members filed it.
Who proposed what
- הרשימה המשותפת · 30The Joint List group seeks to delete or advance the start dates of the provisions, to narrow police powers and limit them to police officers, to narrow the definition of "employer," to reduce fines, to shorten the periods of restriction orders and administrative detention, and to delete several proposed punitive and restrictive provisions.Sections: לסעיף 4, לסעיף 6
- מרצ · 8The Meretz group seeks to determine that the law's purpose is not genuine but harmful, and to delete various punitive provisions and restrictions in the bill, such as prison sentences, exemption of family members, and establishing a limitation on the applicability of the transportation and harboring provisions.Sections: לפני סעיף 1, לסעיף 6
- המחנה הציוני · 5The Zionist Camp group seeks to extend certain notice periods and shorten others, to limit the duration of the administrative restriction order, and to establish a limitation on the applicability of the transportation and harboring provisions to spouses and children.Sections: לסעיף 6Isaac Herzog, Tzipi Livni, Shelly Yachimovich, Stav Shaffir, Itzik Shmuli, Omer Barlev, Yehiel Hilik Bar, Amir Peretz, Merav Michaeli, Eitan Cabel, Manuel Trajtenberg, Erel Margalit, Micky Rosenthal, Revital Swid, Yoel Hasson, Zouheir Bahloul, Eytan Broshi, Michal Biran, Nachman Shai, Ksenia Svetlova, Ayelet Nahmias-Verbin, Yoseph Yonah, Eyal Ben Reuven, Yael Cohen Paran
Asked to speak: Mordhay Yogev (Jewish Home), Uri Maklev (United Torah Judaism)
Proposers and reservation numbers are extracted automatically from the committee version, and the count is checked against the numbers printed in it. The descriptions are an automatic summary. Committee version for the second and third reading (PDF)
Reservations, sections and other votes (11)
In order. Votes on reservations and individual sections are shown separately from the vote on the bill as a whole.
- 14 March 2016 · Second reading · הסתייגותהצעת חוק הכניסה לישראל (תיקון מס' 26), התשע"ו-2016Bill on Entry into Israel (Amendment No. 26), 2016auto26 for · 44 againstVote on a reservation (amendment)
- 14 March 2016 · Second reading · קריאה שנייההצעת חוק הכניסה לישראל (תיקון מס' 26), התשע"ו-2016Bill on Entry into Israel (Amendment No. 26), 2016auto56 for · 16 againstVote on sections of the bill
- 14 March 2016 · Stage unknown · הצבעההצעת חוק הכניסה לישראל (תיקון מס' 26), התשע"ו-2016Bill on Entry into Israel (Amendment No. 26), 2016auto28 for · 42 againstQuestion type unknown
- 14 March 2016 · Second reading · קריאה שנייההצעת חוק הכניסה לישראל (תיקון מס' 26), התשע"ו-2016Bill on Entry into Israel (Amendment No. 26), 2016auto57 for · 15 againstVote on sections of the bill
- 14 March 2016 · Second reading · הסתייגותהצעת חוק הכניסה לישראל (תיקון מס' 26), התשע"ו-2016Bill on Entry into Israel (Amendment No. 26), 2016auto20 for · 43 againstVote on a reservation (amendment)
- 14 March 2016 · Second reading · הסתייגותהצעת חוק הכניסה לישראל (תיקון מס' 26), התשע"ו-2016Bill on Entry into Israel (Amendment No. 26), 2016auto28 for · 40 againstVote on a reservation (amendment)
- 14 March 2016 · Second reading · הסתייגותהצעת חוק הכניסה לישראל (תיקון מס' 26), התשע"ו-2016Bill on Entry into Israel (Amendment No. 26), 2016auto29 for · 40 againstVote on a reservation (amendment)
- 14 March 2016 · Second reading · הסתייגותהצעת חוק הכניסה לישראל (תיקון מס' 26), התשע"ו-2016Bill on Entry into Israel (Amendment No. 26), 2016auto35 for · 39 againstVote on a reservation (amendment)
- 14 March 2016 · Second reading · הסתייגותהצעת חוק הכניסה לישראל (תיקון מס' 26), התשע"ו-2016Bill on Entry into Israel (Amendment No. 26), 2016auto30 for · 40 againstVote on a reservation (amendment)
- 14 March 2016 · Second reading · הסתייגותהצעת חוק הכניסה לישראל (תיקון מס' 26), התשע"ו-2016Bill on Entry into Israel (Amendment No. 26), 2016auto29 for · 40 againstVote on a reservation (amendment)
- 14 March 2016 · Second reading · קריאה שנייההצעת חוק הכניסה לישראל (תיקון מס' 26), התשע"ו-2016Bill on Entry into Israel (Amendment No. 26), 2016auto56 for · 16 againstVote on sections of the bill