Government bill · 25th Knesset · published as law 12 May 2024
חוק לתיקון פקודת סדר הדין הפלילי (מעצר וחיפוש) (מס' 16), התשפ"ד–2024Law to Amend Criminal Procedure Ordinance (Arrest and Search) (No. 16), 2024 · automatic translation · suggest a correction
Status: התקבלה בקריאה שלישית
Topics: Police and internal security*, Courts and criminal law* · * from the Knesset's official law classification
Official summary of the law (Knesset)
As part of the Law for Combating Illegal Weapons (Legislative Amendment and Temporary Provision), 2023, an amendment was made to the Criminal Procedure Ordinance (Arrest and Search) [New Version], 1969 (hereinafter – the Ordinance), adding two new grounds for conducting a search without a judge's warrant, in order to provide the police with effective enforcement tools for eradicating the phenomenon of illegal weapons. The first new ground allows a police officer to conduct a search without a judge's warrant if there is a reasonable suspicion that a weapon or a substantial part of a weapon, which may serve as evidence of an offense, is located at a place, and if due to the immediate need to conduct the search a warrant cannot be obtained. The second new ground allows the police to search documentation or a camera that may serve as evidence of an offense punishable by at least ten years' imprisonment, including a weapons offense, an offense of shooting in a residential area, or an offense of extortion by threats. Regarding both these grounds, it was established that the search will be conducted only with written approval of a police officer at the rank of chief superintendent or higher, which will include the circumstances and reasons for the need for an immediate search without a warrant. It was further established that if during the search an item unrelated to the offense for which the approval to conduct the search was given is discovered, the police officer will be permitted to seize the item and bring it before a judge, who will decide what is to be done with it. These arrangements were established as a temporary provision for a period of one year, starting from 15 May 2023, in order to allow for a review of the proposed arrangements. As part of Amendment No. 16 to the Ordinance, it was established that the temporary provision would be extended until 1 July 2024.
automatic translation · suggest a correction
Hebrew original
במסגרת חוק המאבק בכלי הנשק הבלתי חוקיים (תיקון חקיקה והוראת שעה), התשפ"ג–2023, נעשה תיקון לפקודת סדר הדין הפלילי (מעצר וחיפוש) [נוסח חדש], התשכ"ט–1969 (להלן – הפקודה), לפיו נוספו שתי עילות חדשות לביצוע חיפוש ללא צו שופט במטרה להקנות למשטרה כלי אכיפה יעילים למיגור תופעת כלי הנשק הבלתי חוקיים. העילה הראשונה שנוספה מאפשרת לשוטר לבצע חיפוש ללא צו שופט אם התעורר חשד סביר שכלי נשק או חלק מהותי מנשק, שעשוי לשמש ראיה לביצוע עבירה, נמצא במקום, ואם בשל הצורך המיידי לביצוע החיפוש לא ניתן לקבל צו. העילה השנייה שנוספה מאפשרת למשטרה לבצע חיפוש של תיעוד או מצלמה שעשויים לשמש ראיה לביצוע עבירה שדינה עשר שנות מאסר לפחות, הכוללת עבירת נשק, עבירה של ירי במקום מגורים או עבירת סחיטה באיומים. לגבי שתי עילות אלו, נקבע כי החיפוש יבוצע רק באישור בכתב של קצין משטרה בדרגת רב-פקד ומעלה, שיכלול את הנסיבות והנימוקים לצורך בחיפוש מיידי ללא צו. עוד נקבע כי אם במהלך החיפוש נתגלה חפץ שאינו נוגע לעבירה שבשלה ניתן האישור לביצוע החיפוש, השוטר יהיה רשאי לתפוס את החפץ ולהביאו לבחינת שופט, אשר יחליט מה ייעשה בו. הסדרים אלו נקבעו כהוראת שעה לתקופה של שנה, החל מיום כ"ד באייר התשפ"ג (15 במאי 2023), זאת בכדי לאפשר בחינה של ההסדרים המוצעים. במסגרת תיקון מספר 16 לפקודה, נקבע כי הוראת השעה תוארך עד ליום כ"ה בסיוון התשפ"ד (1 ביולי 2024).
Readings
- Bill passed first reading21 for · 6 against
- 8 May 2024 · Third readingהצעת חוק לתיקון פקודת סדר הדין הפלילי (מעצר וחיפוש)(תיקון מס' 16), התשפ"ד-2024Bill to Amend Criminal Procedure Ordinance (Arrest and Search) (Amendment No. 16), 2024autoLaw passed6 for · 1 against
What was said in the plenum
The bill seeks to extend for a short period a temporary provision granting the police authority to conduct searches without a judicial warrant in cases of suspected illegal weapons or documentation related to serious offenses, against the backdrop of the fight against crime and illegal weapons mainly in Arab society. Most of the discussion did not address the content of the proposal itself but was used for speeches on other topics such as the situation in the north and south, the cost of living, the hostages and the conduct of the war, and the demolition of houses in Arab and Bedouin society, with opposition to the proposal focusing mainly on criticism of the responsible minister and the implementation of the authority rather than on the principle itself.
automatic translation · suggest a correction
Hebrew original
הצעת החוק מבקשת להאריך בפרק זמן קצר הוראת שעה המעניקה למשטרה סמכות לערוך חיפוש ללא צו שיפוטי במקרים של חשד לנשק בלתי חוקי או לתיעוד הקשור לעבירות חמורות, על רקע המאבק בפשיעה ובכלי נשק בלתי חוקיים בעיקר בחברה הערבית. רוב הדיון לא עסק בתוכן ההצעה עצמה אלא נוצל לנאומים על נושאים אחרים כגון המצב בצפון ובדרום, יוקר המחיה, החטופים וניהול המלחמה, והריסות בתים בחברה הערבית והבדואית, כאשר ההתנגדות להצעה התמקדה בעיקר בביקורת על השר הממונה ויישום הסמכות ולא בעיקרון עצמו.
Arguments for
- There is a need to give the police effective tools to immediately seize illegal weapons and evidence in order to eradicate serious crime and increase detection and prosecution rates.Meir Porush, Tzvika Foghel (Otzma Yehudit)
- Extending the temporary provision for a short period is necessary to allow the police, whose resources were diverted to the Iron Swords War, to fully utilize the authority and examine its usefulness before a decision is made on a permanent provision.Meir Porush, Tzvika Foghel (Otzma Yehudit)
- The data collected so far show that the authority has led to the seizure of many weapons and documents and to the filing of indictments, with controls in place such as officer approval, a documentation requirement, and reporting to the legal advisor and the Knesset.Meir Porush, Tzvika Foghel (Otzma Yehudit)
- Those who pay the heaviest price from illegal weapons in circulation are mainly the Arab public, and therefore the law serves its interest.Tzvika Foghel (Otzma Yehudit)
Arguments against
- The new authority does not provide a real response to violent crime in Arab society but will allow the police to conduct unlimited searches in the homes of innocent citizens, while the minister in charge of the police manages it according to a harmful and racist policy toward Arab society rather than professional rule of law.Waleed Taha (Ra'am), Ofer Cassif (Hadash–Ta'al)
- The minister in charge of the police is a repeatedly convicted criminal who takes pride in issuing demolition orders and harmful enforcement actions against Arab society, and therefore should not be granted additional broad powers.Waleed Taha (Ra'am)
Who spoke (30)
| Member | Faction | Readings | Speeches | In the final vote |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meir Porush | — | Third reading | 1 | no record |
| Yair Lapid | Yesh Atid opposition | Third reading | 1 | no record |
| Yoav Segalovitz | Yesh Atid opposition | Third reading | 1 | no record |
| Yifat Shasha Biton | New Hope opposition | Third reading | 1 | no record |
| Merav Ben Ari | Yesh Atid opposition | Third reading | 1 | no record |
| Elazar Stern | Yesh Atid opposition | Third reading | 1 | no record |
| Debbie Biton | Yesh Atid opposition | Third reading | 1 | no record |
| Avigdor Liberman | Yisrael Beytenu opposition | Third reading | 1 | no record |
| Hanoch Dov Milwidsky | Likud coalition | Third reading | 1 | no record |
| Tatiana Mazarsky | Yesh Atid opposition | Third reading | 1 | no record |
| Gilad Kariv | Labor opposition | Third reading | 1 | no record |
| Naor Shiri | Yesh Atid opposition | Third reading | 1 | no record |
| Aida Touma Sliman | Hadash–Ta'al opposition | Third reading | 1 | no record |
| Naama Lazimi | Labor opposition | Third reading | 1 | no record |
| Waleed Taha | Ra'am opposition | Third reading | 2 | against |
| Ofer Cassif | Hadash–Ta'al opposition | Third reading | 1 | no record |
| Mickey Levy | Yesh Atid opposition | Third reading | 1 | no record |
| Ariel Kallner | Likud coalition | Third reading | 1 | no record |
| Shelly Tal Meron | Yesh Atid opposition | Third reading | 1 | no record |
| Waleed Alhwashla | Ra'am opposition | Third reading | 1 | no record |
| Oded Forer | Yisrael Beytenu opposition | Third reading | 1 | no record |
| Sharon Nir | Yisrael Beytenu opposition | Third reading | 1 | no record |
| Meir Cohen | Yesh Atid opposition | Third reading | 1 | no record |
| Ahmad Tibi | Hadash–Ta'al opposition | Third reading | 1 | no record |
| Iman Khatib Yassin | Ra'am opposition | Third reading | 1 | no record |
| Yaron Levi | Yesh Atid opposition | Third reading | 1 | no record |
| Yasir Hujeirat | Ra'am opposition | Third reading | 1 | no record |
| Boaz Bismuth | Likud coalition | Third reading | 1 | no record |
| Tzvi Yedidia Sukkot | Religious Zionism coalition | Third reading | 1 | no record |
| Tzvika Foghel | Otzma Yehudit coalition | Third reading | 1 | for |
An automatic summary of the plenum transcripts: the debate on the bill at every reading it was voted on. Arguments are given as the speakers made them; this is not an assessment. The list of speakers comes from the transcript, without a model. Transcript of the sitting: 1 · write to the author
Reservations to the second reading
1 reservation was filed: proposed changes to the text the committee brought to the second and third reading.
The reservations filed to the law seek to move up the law's effective date to an earlier date than that specified in the original text, while proposing several alternative possible dates.
automatic translation · suggest a correction
Hebrew original
ההסתייגויות שהוגשו לחוק מבקשות להקדים את מועד תחילתו של החוק למועד מוקדם מהקבוע בנוסח המקורי, תוך הצעת מספר חלופות של תאריכים אפשריים.
By faction
- Ra'am opposition · 1 reservation · 5 members
A joint reservation counts for every faction whose members filed it.
Who proposed what
- קבוצת רע״ם · 1The Ra'am faction proposes to move the law's effective date to an earlier date than specified in the bill, and offers alternative earlier dates as well.Sections: לסעיף 1
Asked to speak: Naama Lazimi (Labor), Gilad Kariv (Labor), Efrat Rayten Marom (Labor)
Proposers and reservation numbers are extracted automatically from the committee version, and the count is checked against the numbers printed in it. The descriptions are an automatic summary. Committee version for the second and third reading (PDF) · write to the author
Reservations, sections and other votes (1)
In order. Votes on reservations and individual sections are shown separately from the vote on the bill as a whole.
- 8 May 2024 · Second reading · סעיף 1הצעת חוק לתיקון פקודת סדר הדין הפלילי (מעצר וחיפוש)(תיקון מס' 16), התשפ"ד-2024Bill to Amend Criminal Procedure Ordinance (Arrest and Search) (Amendment No. 16), 2024auto5 for · 1 againstVote on sections of the bill