Government bill · 25th Knesset · published as law 14 June 2023

חוק הדרכונים (תיקון מס' 10), התשפ"ג-2023Passports Law (Amendment No. 10), 2023 · automatic translation · suggest a correction

Status: התקבלה בקריאה שלישית

Topics: Aliyah, citizenship and immigration* · * from the Knesset's official law classification

Official summary of the law (Knesset)

The Amendment authorizes the Minister of Interior to refuse to grant an Israeli passport to an immigrant who has not yet settled in Israel. Instead of a passport, the Minister of Interior may grant him a travel document. In doing so, the Amendment restores the situation to what it was until 2017.

automatic translation · suggest a correction

Hebrew original

התיקון מסמיך את שר הפנים לסרב להעניק דרכון ישראלי לעולה אשר טרם השתקע בישראל. במקום דרכון, יוכל שר הפנים להעניק לו תעודת מעבר. בכך, משיב התיקון את המצב לקדמותו כפי שהיה עד 2017.

Sponsors

Yosef Taieb

Readings

What was said in the plenum

The law cancels Amendment No. 9 from 2017 and restores to the Minister of Interior the authority to refuse to issue a first Israeli passport to an immigrant who received citizenship under the Law of Return but has not yet settled in Israel, so that instead of a passport they will be given a travel document until their settlement is proven. The debate revolved around the question of whether there is a substantive, statistical, and security-based justification for returning to the previous situation, or whether this constitutes discriminatory and unjustified harm to new immigrants stemming from political considerations.

automatic translation · suggest a correction

Hebrew original

החוק מבטל את תיקון מס' 9 משנת 2017 ומשיב לשר הפנים את הסמכות לסרב לתת דרכון ישראלי ראשון לעולה שקיבל אזרחות מכוח חוק השבות אך טרם השתקע בישראל, כך שבמקום דרכון יינתן לו תעודת מעבר עד שתוכח השתקעותו. הדיון נסב סביב השאלה האם יש הצדקה עניינית, סטטיסטית וביטחונית לחזרה למצב הקודם, או שמדובר בפגיעה מפלה ובלתי מוצדקת בעולים חדשים הנובעת משיקולים פוליטיים.

Arguments for

  • Amendment No. 9 enabled a widespread phenomenon of exploiting immediate citizenship granted under the Law of Return solely to obtain an Israeli passport, without any other real connection to the state, and therefore the previous situation should be restored.
    Yariv Levin (Likud), Yaakov Asher (United Torah Judaism)
  • Granting an immediate passport to immigrants who have not yet settled harms the strength and prestige of the Israeli passport and may affect the possibility of visa-free entry into countries that recognize the Israeli passport, including the United States.
    Yariv Levin (Likud), Yaakov Asher (United Torah Judaism), Erez Malul (Shas)
  • Security officials expressed concern that the existing situation could allow abuse of the Law of Return to obtain an Israeli passport by elements seeking to harm state security.
    Yariv Levin (Likud)
  • The law is not directed against any particular group of immigrants but applies equally to immigrants from all countries, and does not express a negative attitude toward genuine immigrants seeking to settle in Israel.
    Yaakov Asher (United Torah Judaism)

Arguments against

  • The data presented in the Interior Committee show that the immigrant settlement rate remained almost identical before and after Amendment No. 9, and therefore there is no factual basis for the claim that granting an immediate passport caused a fictitious 'passport wave of immigration.'
    Oded Forer (Yisrael Beytenu), Zeev Elkin (National Unity)
  • The law creates discrimination between citizens: on one hand, a child born abroad to Israeli parents who has never visited Israel receives a passport automatically, while on the other hand, a new immigrant who has actually settled is required to wait and prove themselves like a 'suspect'.
    Zeev Elkin (National Unity)
  • Denying a passport harms the essential and everyday needs of immigrants and their families - managing businesses, caring for elderly parents abroad, participating in professional conferences - and leads to the splitting of families and even to Jewish families giving up on immigrating to Israel.
    Vladimir Beliak (Yesh Atid), Tatiana Mazarsky (Yesh Atid)
  • The law is part of a broader trend of harm and hostility toward immigrants, mainly from the Commonwealth of Independent States, including offensive statements by ministers, cuts to absorption budgets, long lines for ulpanim, and bureaucratic difficulties, which harm the ethos of immigration to the State of Israel.
    Vladimir Beliak (Yesh Atid), Tatiana Mazarsky (Yesh Atid), Oded Forer (Yisrael Beytenu)
  • This is an exceptional repeal of a law that the current coalition itself enacted and supported six years ago, without a substantive explanation for the change in position, which indicates that this is a political-personal motive rather than the public interest.
    Zeev Elkin (National Unity), Evgeny Sova (Yisrael Beytenu)
Who spoke (11)
MemberFactionReadingsSpeechesIn the final vote
Yariv LevinLikud coalitionFirst reading1no record
Yaakov AsherUnited Torah Judaism coalitionThird reading1no record
Vladimir BeliakYesh Atid oppositionThird reading1against
Tatiana MazarskyYesh Atid oppositionThird reading1against
Merav Ben AriYesh Atid oppositionThird reading1against
Alon SchusterNational Unity oppositionThird reading1against
Oded ForerYisrael Beytenu oppositionThird reading1against
Yulia MalinovskyYisrael Beytenu oppositionThird reading1against
Zeev ElkinNational Unity oppositionThird reading1against
Evgeny SovaYisrael Beytenu oppositionThird reading1against
Erez MalulShas coalitionThird reading1for

An automatic summary of the plenum transcripts: the debate on the bill at every reading it was voted on. Arguments are given as the speakers made them; this is not an assessment. The list of speakers comes from the transcript, without a model. Transcripts of the sittings: 1, 2 · write to the author

Reservations to the second reading

12 reservations were filed: proposed changes to the text the committee brought to the second and third reading.

The reservations were intended to delete or change the main provisions of the Amendment to the Passports Law, including canceling the new restrictions on issuing and extending passports to those who received citizenship under the Law of Return, and adding government reporting and oversight requirements to the Knesset regarding the law's implementation.

automatic translation · suggest a correction

Hebrew original

ההסתייגויות נועדו למחוק או לשנות את עיקרי התיקון לחוק הדרכונים, ובכלל זה לבטל את ההגבלות החדשות על מתן והארכת דרכונים למי שקיבל אזרחות לפי חוק השבות, ולהוסיף חובות דיווח ופיקוח של הממשלה על הכנסת בנוגע ליישום החוק.

By faction

  • National Unity opposition · 12 reservations · 12 members
  • Labor opposition · 12 reservations · 4 members
  • Yesh Atid opposition · 12 reservations · 24 members
  • Yisrael Beytenu opposition · 12 reservations · 6 members

A joint reservation counts for every faction whose members filed it.

Who proposed what

Asked to speak: Ayman Odeh (Hadash–Ta'al), Ahmad Tibi (Hadash–Ta'al), Aida Touma Sliman (Hadash–Ta'al), Ofer Cassif (Hadash–Ta'al), Youssef Atauna (Hadash–Ta'al)

Proposers and reservation numbers are extracted automatically from the committee version, and the count is checked against the numbers printed in it. The descriptions are an automatic summary. Committee version for the second and third reading (PDF) · write to the author

Reservations, sections and other votes (15)

In order. Votes on reservations and individual sections are shown separately from the vote on the bill as a whole.

Source: bill page in the Knesset legislation database ↗

Passports Law (Amendment No. 10), 2023 · How the Knesset Votes