27 July 2015, 22:11 · 20th Knesset · vote no. 22293
הצעת חוק לייעול האכיפה והפיקוח העירוניים ברשויות המקומיות (הוראת שעה) (תיקון מס' 2), התשע"ה-2015Bill for the Streamlining of Municipal Enforcement and Supervision in Local Authorities (temporary provision) (Amendment No. 2), 2015 · automatic translation · suggest a correction
אישור החוק
Law passed: 35 for, 17 against
52 of 120 voted — official Knesset result
What was put to the vote
«לקבל את הצעת החוק בקריאה שלישית»
Third reading: The final vote. A bill that passes its third reading becomes law. Glossary →
About the law and the debate
Official summary of the law (Knesset)
The Law for the Efficient Enforcement and Supervision by Municipalities created the municipal policing framework, under which inspectors of local authorities operate in assistance to the Israel Police in actions to prevent violence. The Law was enacted in 2011 as a temporary provision for a two-year trial period, and in 2013 it was extended by an additional two years. The current amendment extends the temporary provision, under which the municipal policing framework operates in certain local authorities, by an additional year and a half, until 28 February 2017.
automatic translation · suggest a correction
Hebrew original
החוק לייעול האכיפה והפיקוח העירוניים ברשויות המקומיות יצר את מערך השיטור העירוני, במסגרתו פועלים פקחים של הרשויות המקומיות בסיוע למשטרת ישראל בפעולות למניעת אלימות. החוק נחקק בשנת 2011 כהוראת שעה לתקופת ניסיון של שנתיים, ובשנת 2013 הוארך בשנתיים נוספות. התיקון הנוכחי מאריך את הוראת השעה, במסגרתה פועל מערך השיטור העירוני ברשויות מקומיות מסוימות, בשנה וחצי נוספות, עד ליום ב' באדר התשע"ז (28 בפברואר 2017).
What was said in the plenum
Supporters saidautoThe municipal enforcement and oversight system has proven its effectiveness and the satisfaction with it among heads of local authorities and the Israel Police, and therefore it should be continued and expanded.Speakers who made this point: 1Opponents saidautoAfter four and a half years, and following three extensions, the Knesset has never received data or held a substantive discussion on the results of the pilot, and it is unclear whether the system is functioning properly or whether there have been cases of improper use of authority or violence.Speakers who made this point: 24 members spoke
By party on the day of the vote
Coalition and opposition voted differently.
- for
- abstained
- against
Likudהליכודcoalition16 for · 0 against — majority for
Zionist Unionהמחנה הציוניopposition0 for · 11 against — majority against
- Eyal Ben Reuvenagainst
- Yehiel Hilik Baragainst
- Eytan Broshiagainst
- Omer Barlevagainst
- Yoel Hassonagainst
- Eitan Cabelagainst
- Merav Michaeliagainst
- Ayelet Nahmias-Verbinagainst
- Ksenia Svetlovaagainst
- Nachman Shaiagainst
- Itzik Shmuliagainst
Kulanuכולנו בראשות משה כחלוןcoalition7 for · 0 against — majority for
Meretzמרצopposition0 for · 5 against — majority against
- Ilan Gilonagainst
- Zehava Galonagainst
- Tamar Zandbergagainst
- Esawi Frejagainst
- Michal Rozinagainst
Shasש"סcoalition4 for · 0 against — majority for
United Torah Judaismיהדות התורהcoalition3 for · 0 against — majority for
- Moshe Gafnifor
- Uri Maklevfor
- Meir Porushfor
Yisrael Beytenuישראל ביתנוopposition3 for · 0 against — majority for
- Robert Ilatovfor
- Sofa Landverfor
- Hamad Amarfor
Yesh Atidיש עתידopposition1 for · 0 against · 1 present, not voting — majority for
- Aliza Laviepresent, did not vote
- Mickey Levyfor
Jewish Homeהבית היהודי בראשות נפתלי בנטcoalition1 for · 0 against — majority for
Joint Listהרשימה המשותפת (חד"ש, רע"ם, בל"ד ותע"ל)opposition0 for · 1 against — majority against
- Abd Al Hakeem Haj Yahyaagainst
Roll call (53)
Showing 53 of 53
Numbers and sources
- For
- 35
- Against
- 17
- Abstained
- 0
- Present, did not vote
- 1
Official result: 35 for, 17 against, 0 abstained — adopted. Taking that into account, the roll call matches the official result.
Only members with a record are counted. No record does not mean the member was absent.