Government bill · 20th Knesset · published as law 31 December 2015
חוק לתיקון פקודת העיריות (הוראת שעה) (תיקון מס' 3), התשע"ו-2015Law for the Amendment of the Municipalities Ordinance (temporary provision) (Amendment No. 3), 2015 · automatic translation · suggest a correction
Status: התקבלה בקריאה שלישית
Topics: Local government* · * from the Knesset's official law classification
Official summary of the law (Knesset)
The Law provides that the temporary provision authorizing local authorities to collect a guarding levy or guarding fee shall be extended until 31 December 2017. In this context, it is established that the funds from the guarding levy and guarding fee shall be managed by the municipal treasurer, in a separate account, and used solely for financing guarding matters. A transitional provision was also established, according to which a local authority may continue to collect a guarding levy or guarding fee higher than the maximum amount permitted, under an auxiliary by-law that was in effect prior to the commencement of the Law, until the end of 2016; provided that by 30 June 2016 an auxiliary by-law approved by the local authority's council, allowing the collection of a guarding levy or guarding fee not exceeding the maximum permitted amount, was brought to the attention of the Minister of the Interior.
automatic translation · suggest a correction
Hebrew original
נקבע בחוק כי הוראת השעה המסמיכה רשויות מקומיות לגבות היטל שמירה או אגרת שמירה תוארך עד ליום י"ג בטבת התשע"ח (31 בדצמבר 2017). במסגרת זאת נקבע כי כספי היטל השמירה ואגרת השמירה ינוהלו על ידי גזבר העירייה, בחשבון נפרד ולצורך מימון ענייני שמירה בלבד. עוד נקבעה הוראת מעבר לפיה רשות מקומית רשאית להמשיך ולגבות היטל שמירה או אגרת שמירה הגבוהים מהסכום המרבי המותר, לפי חוק עזר שהיה בתוקף ערב תחילתו של החוק, עד סוף שנת 2016; ובלבד שעד ליום כ"ד בסיוון התשע"ו (30 ביוני 2016) הובא לידיעת שר הפנים חוק עזר, שאישרה מועצת הרשות המקומית, המאפשר גביית היטל שמירה או אגרת שמירה שאינם חורגים מהסכום המרבי המותר.
Readings
- 30 November 2015 · First reading · להעביר את הצעת החוק לוועדההצעת חוק לתיקון פקודת העיריות (הוראת שעה) (תיקון מס' 3), התשע"ו-2015Bill for the Amendment of the Municipalities Ordinance (temporary provision) (Amendment No. 3), 2015autoBill passed first reading47 for · 30 against
- 28 December 2015 · Third reading · אישור החוקהצעת חוק לתיקון פקודת העיריות (הוראת שעה) (תיקון מס' 3), התשע"ו-2015Bill for the Amendment of the Municipalities Ordinance (temporary provision) (Amendment No. 3), 2015autoLaw passed56 for · 17 against
What was said in the plenum
The bill seeks to extend by two additional years the validity of the temporary provision anchoring the authority of a local authority to regulate matters of guarding, security and public order within its area, including the collection of a fee or levy for these services, as a continuation of previous extensions of the provision dating back to 2011. The debate concerns the question of whether it is appropriate to continue imposing the responsibility and financial burden for guarding and security on local authorities and residents, or whether this is a duty that should remain with the central government and the police.
automatic translation · suggest a correction
Hebrew original
הצעת החוק מבקשת להאריך בשנתיים נוספות את תוקפה של הוראת השעה המעגנת את סמכותה של רשות מקומית להסדיר בתחומה עניינים של שמירה, אבטחה וסדר ציבורי, לרבות גביית אגרה או היטל בעד שירותים אלה, כהמשך להארכות קודמות של ההוראה משנת 2011. הדיון נסב על השאלה אם ראוי להמשיך ולהטיל את האחריות והעול הכספי לשמירה ולביטחון על הרשויות המקומיות והתושבים, או שזו חובה שצריכה להישאר בידי השלטון המרכזי והמשטרה.
Arguments for
None were made.
Arguments against
- The law effectively constitutes a privatization of police functions and the maintenance of public order, and transferring them to local authorities without adequate oversight may lead to lawlessness and chaos.Abdullah Abu Maaruf (Joint List), Osama Saadi (Joint List)
- Residents are being saddled with responsibility and a financial burden (guarding fees) for a service that should be the government's responsibility, since the government cannot shirk its duty to ensure the security of citizens.Yael German (Yesh Atid)
- Local authorities, especially Arab authorities suffering from severe budget shortages, are unable to provide even basic services such as education, health and welfare, and there is no point in burdening them with an additional area such as guarding and security.Osama Saadi (Joint List)
- The amendment, presented as a temporary provision, in fact exposes a structural and persistent problem in the relations between central and local government, and requires a comprehensive reform rather than a further extension of a provisional arrangement.Eytan Broshi (Zionist Union)
Who spoke (5)
| Member | Faction | Readings | Speeches | In the final vote |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Silvan Shalom | Likud coalition | First reading | 9 | no record |
| Abdullah Abu Maaruf | Joint List opposition | First reading | 1 | no record |
| Eytan Broshi | Zionist Union opposition | First reading | 1 | for |
| Yael German | Yesh Atid opposition | First reading | 3 | no record |
| Osama Saadi | Joint List opposition | First reading | 1 | no record |
An automatic summary of the plenum transcripts: the debate on the bill at every reading it was voted on. Arguments are given as the speakers made them; this is not an assessment. The list of speakers comes from the transcript, without a model. Transcripts of the sittings: 1, 2
Reservations to the second reading
2 reservations were filed: proposed changes to the text the committee brought to the second and third reading.
The reservations are intended to shorten the period of applicability of the temporary provision and to add a requirement for discussion in the Knesset Interior and Environmental Protection Committee on the issue of local authorities' power to regulate guarding, security and public order.
automatic translation · suggest a correction
Hebrew original
ההסתייגויות נועדו לקצר את מועד תחולתה של הוראת השעה ולהוסיף חובת דיון בוועדת הפנים והגנת הסביבה של הכנסת בנושא סמכות הרשות המקומית להסדיר שמירה, אבטחה וסדר ציבורי.
By faction
- Meretz opposition · 2 reservations · 1 member
A joint reservation counts for every faction whose members filed it.
Who proposed what
- תמר זנדברג · 2The reservations seek to shorten the period of applicability of the temporary provision and to require the Knesset Interior and Environmental Protection Committee to hold a thorough discussion on the issue of local authorities' power to regulate guarding, security and public order within their jurisdiction.Sections: לסעיף 1, לאחרי סעיף 2
Proposers and reservation numbers are extracted automatically from the committee version, and the count is checked against the numbers printed in it. The descriptions are an automatic summary. The reservation numbers in this document cannot be read as text, so the count was not checked against it automatically. Committee version for the second and third reading (PDF)
Reservations, sections and other votes (3)
In order. Votes on reservations and individual sections are shown separately from the vote on the bill as a whole.
- 28 December 2015 · Second reading · קריאה שנייההצעת חוק לתיקון פקודת העיריות (הוראת שעה) (תיקון מס' 3), התשע"ו-2015Bill for the Amendment of the Municipalities Ordinance (temporary provision) (Amendment No. 3), 2015auto53 for · 18 againstVote on sections of the bill
- 28 December 2015 · Second reading · הסתייגותהצעת חוק לתיקון פקודת העיריות (הוראת שעה) (תיקון מס' 3), התשע"ו-2015Bill for the Amendment of the Municipalities Ordinance (temporary provision) (Amendment No. 3), 2015auto29 for · 44 againstVote on a reservation (amendment)
- 28 December 2015 · Second reading · קריאה שנייההצעת חוק לתיקון פקודת העיריות (הוראת שעה) (תיקון מס' 3), התשע"ו-2015Bill for the Amendment of the Municipalities Ordinance (temporary provision) (Amendment No. 3), 2015auto55 for · 17 againstVote on sections of the bill