Government bill · 19th Knesset · published as law 1 May 2013
חוק המאבק בתופעת השכרות (הוראת שעה ותיקון חקיקה) (תיקון), התשע"ג-2013Law on Combating the Phenomenon of Drunkenness (temporary provision and legislative amendments) (Amendment), 2013 · automatic translation · suggest a correction
Status: התקבלה בקריאה שלישית
Topics: Health*, Police and internal security*, Courts and criminal law* · * from the Knesset's official law classification
What the sponsors propose
The Bill seeks to make permanent two temporary provisions concerning the fight against the phenomenon of drunkenness: the Law on the Fight Against Drunkenness (Temporary Provision and Legislative Amendment), 2010, and the Business Licensing Law (Amendment No. 26 - Temporary Provision), 2010. According to the sponsors, after examining the implementation of the arrangements, it was found that the mechanisms established therein are efficient and effective in dealing with the phenomenon of drunkenness and its damages, and that there has been a steady increase in the ability to deal with the phenomenon, as evidenced by data from the Israel Police, the National Authority for the War on Drugs and Alcohol, and the Ministry of Education. In addition, several additional legislative amendments are proposed, including clarifying the application of a presumption set forth in Section 3 of the law and canceling the minimum fine set forth in Section 14b(b) of the Business Licensing Law, according to the sponsors in order to increase the scope of enforcement by local authorities.
automatic translation · suggest a correction
Hebrew original
הצעת החוק מבקשת להפוך לקבע שתי הוראות שעה שעניינן המאבק בתופעת השכרות: חוק המאבק בתופעת השכרות (הוראת שעה ותיקון חקיקה), התש״ע-2010, וחוק רישוי עסקים (תיקון מס׳ 26 - הוראת שעה), התש״ע-2010. לדברי המציעים, לאחר בחינת יישום ההסדרים נמצא כי המנגנונים הקבועים בהם יעילים ואפקטיביים להתמודדות עם תופעת השכרות ונזקיה, וכי חלה עלייה מתמדת ביכולת ההתמודדות עם התופעה, כפי שעולה מנתוני משטרת ישראל, הרשות הלאומית למלחמה בסמים ובאלכוהול ומשרד החינוך. בנוסף מוצעים מספר תיקוני חקיקה נוספים, ביניהם הבהרת תחולת חזקה הקבועה בסעיף 3 לחוק וביטול קנס מינימום הקבוע בסעיף 14ב(ב) לחוק רישוי עסקים, זאת לדברי המציעים כדי להגדיל את היקף האכיפה על ידי הרשויות המקומיות.
An automatic summary of the explanatory notes written by the bill's sponsors. These are their arguments, not an official Knesset summary. · The bill on the Knesset website
Readings
- 22 April 2013 · First reading · להעביר את הצעת החוק לוועדההצעת חוק המאבק בתופעת השכרות (הוראת שעה ותיקון חקיקה) (תיקון), התשע"ג-2013Bill on Combating the Phenomenon of Drunkenness (temporary provision and legislative amendments) (Amendment), 2013autoBill passed first reading36 for · 9 against
- 29 April 2013 · Third reading · אישור החוקהצעת חוק המאבק בתופעת השכרות (הוראת שעה ותיקון חקיקה) (תיקון), התשע"ג-2013Bill on Combating the Phenomenon of Drunkenness (temporary provision and legislative amendments) (Amendment), 2013autoLaw passed35 for · 11 against
What was said in the plenum
The law seeks to make permanent two temporary provisions enacted in 2010 as part of the fight against drunkenness: police authority to confiscate and destroy alcoholic beverages in public places at night, and a ban on the sale and serving of alcohol at night, along with an annual reporting requirement to the Knesset on the law's implementation and cancellation of the minimum fine. The debate concerns whether this is an effective and necessary tool against the damage and violence caused by alcohol, or an unjustified and ineffective infringement on the personal freedom of law-abiding adults.
automatic translation · suggest a correction
Hebrew original
החוק מבקש להפוך להוראת קבע שתי הוראות שעה שנחקקו ב-2010 במסגרת המאבק בתופעת השכרות: סמכות שוטרים לתפוס ולהשמיד משקאות משכרים במקום ציבורי בשעות הלילה, ואיסור מכירה והגשה של אלכוהול בשעות הלילה, בתוספת חובת דיווח שנתית לכנסת על יישום החוק וביטול קנס מינימום. הדיון נסב על השאלה אם מדובר באמצעי אפקטיבי ונחוץ למלחמה בנזקי האלכוהול והאלימות הנגרמת ממנו, או בפגיעה בלתי מוצדקת ובלתי יעילה בחופש הפרט של בגירים שומרי חוק.
Arguments for
- The phenomenon of drunkenness and excessive alcohol drinking poses a serious danger to public welfare and is linked to violence, crime, and fatal traffic accidents.Yitzhak Aharonovitch (Likud Yisrael Beytenu), מירי רגב
- Police and National Authority for the War on Drugs and Alcohol data show that the temporary provisions are effective and have helped curb the worsening trend in drinking patterns, and therefore they should be made permanent law.
- Alcohol abuse carries an enormous economic cost for the state, so continuing the fight against this phenomenon saves public funds.Yitzhak Aharonovitch (Likud Yisrael Beytenu)
- The state of youth and violence in schools is highly concerning and justifies continuing the fight against this phenomenon, and the fight should even be strengthened through the education system.Nissim Zeev (Shas), David Azoulay (Shas)
- Oversight of the law's implementation should be increased and a distinction should be made between minors and adults, but without invalidating the law itself.מירי רגב
Arguments against
- The law unnecessarily infringes on the freedom of law-abiding adults, who find themselves harassed by police officers pouring out their drinks in a park or at the beach.Tamar Zandberg (Meretz)
- Selling and serving alcohol to minors is already generally prohibited by law, so the additional prohibition is not needed to protect them and mainly harms adults.Tamar Zandberg (Meretz)
- No data has been presented showing a connection between the draconian powers granted to police officers and the law's purpose of combating drunkenness and violence.Tamar Zandberg (Meretz)
- The powers granted to police officers under the law are too broad and arbitrary and should be restricted, tied to a reasonable suspicion based on data rather than imagination or general suspicion.Tamar Zandberg (Meretz)
- The law should distinguish between minors and adults and shorten the hours during which alcohol sales are prohibited.Tamar Zandberg (Meretz)
Who spoke (5)
| Member | Faction | Readings | Speeches | In the final vote |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yitzhak Aharonovitch | Likud Yisrael Beytenu coalition | First reading | 2 | for |
| Tamar Zandberg | Meretz opposition | First reading, Third reading | 2 | against |
| Nissim Zeev | Shas opposition | First reading | 5 | no record |
| David Azoulay | Shas opposition | First reading | 2 | no record |
| מירי רגב (יו"ר ועדת הפנים והגנת הסביבה) | — | Third reading | 2 | — |
An automatic summary of the plenum transcripts: the debate on the bill at every reading it was voted on. Arguments are given as the speakers made them; this is not an assessment. The list of speakers comes from the transcript, without a model. Transcripts of the sittings: 1, 2
Reservations to the second reading
3 reservations were filed: proposed changes to the text the committee brought to the second and third reading.
The reservations submitted by the Meretz group are intended to tighten the conditions of the definition of an intoxicating beverage, to add registration requirements regarding the handling of containers, and to extend the restricted hours for alcohol sales until midnight.
automatic translation · suggest a correction
Hebrew original
ההסתייגויות שהוגשו על ידי קבוצת מרצ נועדו להחמיר את תנאי ההגדרה למשקה משכר, להוסיף דרישות רישום לעניין הטיפול בכלים, ולהאריך את שעות ההגבלה על מכירת אלכוהול עד חצות הלילה.
By faction
- Meretz opposition · 3 reservations · 6 members
A joint reservation counts for every faction whose members filed it.
Who proposed what
- קבוצת מרצ · 3The Meretz group proposed tightening the conditions of the definition of an intoxicating beverage so that near-certainty of harm would be required, adding provisions regarding registration of the manner and circumstances of handling containers, and extending the hours during which the restrictions apply until midnight instead of until 23:00.Sections: לאחרי סעיף 1, לסעיף 5
Proposers and reservation numbers are extracted automatically from the committee version, and the count is checked against the numbers printed in it. The descriptions are an automatic summary. The reservation numbers in this document cannot be read as text, so the count was not checked against it automatically. Committee version for the second and third reading (PDF)
Reservations, sections and other votes (6)
In order. Votes on reservations and individual sections are shown separately from the vote on the bill as a whole.
- 29 April 2013 · Not a legislative reading · הצעת ועדההצעת חוק המאבק בתופעת השכרות (הוראת שעה ותיקון חקיקה) (תיקון), התשע"ג-2013Bill on Combating the Phenomenon of Drunkenness (temporary provision and legislative amendments) (Amendment), 2013auto37 for · 11 againstProcedural decision
- 29 April 2013 · Second reading · הסתייגותהצעת חוק המאבק בתופעת השכרות (הוראת שעה ותיקון חקיקה) (תיקון), התשע"ג-2013Bill on Combating the Phenomenon of Drunkenness (temporary provision and legislative amendments) (Amendment), 2013auto12 for · 32 againstVote on a reservation (amendment)
- 29 April 2013 · Second reading · הסתייגותהצעת חוק המאבק בתופעת השכרות (הוראת שעה ותיקון חקיקה) (תיקון), התשע"ג-2013Bill on Combating the Phenomenon of Drunkenness (temporary provision and legislative amendments) (Amendment), 2013auto11 for · 36 againstVote on a reservation (amendment)
- 29 April 2013 · Not a legislative reading · הצעת ועדההצעת חוק המאבק בתופעת השכרות (הוראת שעה ותיקון חקיקה) (תיקון), התשע"ג-2013Bill on Combating the Phenomenon of Drunkenness (temporary provision and legislative amendments) (Amendment), 2013auto36 for · 9 againstProcedural decision
- 29 April 2013 · Second reading · הסתייגותהצעת חוק המאבק בתופעת השכרות (הוראת שעה ותיקון חקיקה) (תיקון), התשע"ג-2013Bill on Combating the Phenomenon of Drunkenness (temporary provision and legislative amendments) (Amendment), 2013auto13 for · 35 againstVote on a reservation (amendment)
- 29 April 2013 · Not a legislative reading · הצעת ועדההצעת חוק המאבק בתופעת השכרות (הוראת שעה ותיקון חקיקה) (תיקון), התשע"ג-2013Bill on Combating the Phenomenon of Drunkenness (temporary provision and legislative amendments) (Amendment), 2013auto35 for · 8 againstProcedural decision