Government bill · 18th Knesset · published as law 18 January 2012

חוק בתי המשפט (תיקון מס' 69), התשע"ב-2012Law of Courts (Amendment No. 69), 2012 · automatic translation · suggest a correction

Status: התקבלה בקריאה שלישית

Topics: Labor and wages*, Military and defense*, Courts and criminal law* · * from the Knesset's official law classification

What the sponsors propose

The bill seeks to amend Section 70 of the Courts Law and to add Sections 70a through 70d, which establish that, as a rule, the name of a suspect against whom an indictment has not yet been filed shall not be published for 48 hours from the time he was informed of the existence of an investigation against him, or until the first hearing in his matter, whichever is earlier, in order to allow him to petition the court and request a gag order on the publication of his name. According to the sponsors, in practice a suspect's name is sometimes published before he has had the opportunity to request a publication ban, which empties his right of content and may cause him irreversible harm, particularly when it later turns out that the suspicion was mistaken. The proposal establishes exceptions to the rule, including cases of public interest in publication or urgent investigative need, and also regulates the subject-matter and territorial jurisdiction of the courts to hear these requests and the possibility of appealing decisions regarding publication.

automatic translation · suggest a correction

Hebrew original

הצעת החוק מבקשת לתקן את סעיף 70 לחוק בתי המשפט ולהוסיף סעיפים 70א עד 70ד, הקובעים כי ככלל לא יפורסם שמו של חשוד שטרם הוגש נגדו כתב אישום במשך 48 שעות מהמועד שבו הודע לו על קיום חקירה נגדו, או עד לדיון הראשון בעניינו, לפי המוקדם, וזאת כדי לאפשר לו לפנות לבית המשפט ולבקש איסור פרסום שמו. לדברי המציעים, בפועל לעתים מתפרסם שמו של חשוד בטרם הספיק לבקש איסור פרסום, דבר המרוקן מתוכן את זכותו ועלול לגרום לו נזק בלתי הפיך, בעיקר כשמתברר בהמשך כי החשד היה מוטעה. ההצעה קובעת חריגים לכלל, לרבות מקרים של עניין ציבורי בפרסום או צורך חקירתי דחוף, וכן מסדירה את הסמכות העניינית והמקומית של בתי המשפט לדון בבקשות אלה ואת האפשרות לערער על ההחלטות בעניין פרסום.

An automatic summary of the explanatory notes written by the bill's sponsors. These are their arguments, not an official Knesset summary. · The bill on the Knesset website

Readings

What was said in the plenum

The law stipulates that, as a rule, the name of a suspect against whom no indictment has yet been filed will not be published for 48 hours from the time they learned of the investigation, or until a hearing in their case, subject to exceptions such as public interest, urgent investigative need, or the suspect's consent. The first-reading discussion focused on whether the arrangement adequately protects the presumption of innocence and the privacy of suspects, while the second and third readings were conducted mainly against the backdrop of a broader confrontation between the coalition and the opposition over laws concerning the justice system, in which opponents of the law argued that it harms freedom of the press and the public's right to know.

automatic translation · suggest a correction

Hebrew original

החוק קובע כי ככלל לא יתפרסם שמו של חשוד שטרם הוגש נגדו כתב-אישום במשך 48 שעות מהמועד שבו נודע לו על החקירה, או עד לדיון בעניינו, בכפוף לחריגים כגון עניין ציבורי, צורך חקירתי דחוף או הסכמת החשוד. הדיון בקריאה הראשונה התמקד בשאלה אם ההסדר מגן כראוי על חזקת החפות ועל פרטיות חשודים, ובקריאה השנייה והשלישית התנהל בעיקר על רקע עימות רחב יותר בין הקואליציה לאופוזיציה סביב חוקים הנוגעים למערכת המשפט, שבמסגרתו טענו מתנגדי החוק כי הוא פוגע בחופש העיתונות ובזכות הציבור לדעת.

Arguments for

  • Immediate publication of a suspect's name before he has had an opportunity to turn to the court and request a publication ban causes him irreversible harm, especially when it later turns out that the suspicion was mistaken.
  • A short delay in publication gives the suspect a fair opportunity to defend himself and to exercise his right to dignity and good name in accordance with the principle of the presumption of innocence.
    Dov Khenin (Hadash)
  • The law establishes balanced exceptions allowing publication when there is public interest, an urgent investigative need, the need to locate suspects or witnesses, or the suspect's own consent.
  • Providing accurate and focused information about the specific suspect, instead of delaying publication, which causes rumor-mongering and harmful generalization toward entire groups of similar people, also protects other suspects who are not involved.

Arguments against

  • The bill turns the public and exceptional publication - a publication ban - into the norm, in a way that will mainly serve public figures and wealthy individuals capable of influencing the law enforcement system, and will become a tool for cover-up and whitewashing at the expense of the public and equality before the law.
    Zehava Galon (Meretz)
  • Immediate publication of arrests and investigations is an important safeguard against investigations conducted in secrecy, miscarriages of justice and wrongful convictions, and at times only such publication has extricated an innocent person from a flawed proceeding or encouraged additional complainants to come forward and testify.
    Zehava Galon (Meretz), Nitzan Horowitz (Meretz)
  • The law harms freedom of the press and the public's right to know, and reverses the burden so that the press will have to request the removal of a publication ban instead of publication being the rule.
    Zehava Galon (Meretz), Nitzan Horowitz (Meretz)
  • The bill is another part of a series of laws intended to narrow the democratic space and restrict basic rights, and stems from the personal agenda of the bill's sponsors.
Who spoke (29)
MemberFactionReadingsSpeechesIn the final vote
שר המשפטים יעקב נאמן—First reading2no record
Dov KheninHadash oppositionFirst reading, Third reading4against
David RotemYisrael Beytenu coalitionThird reading11for
Tzipi LivniKadima oppositionThird reading2no record
Yoel HassonKadima oppositionThird reading4no record
Zeev BielskiKadima oppositionThird reading6no record
Nachman ShaiKadima oppositionThird reading11no record
Shlomo (Neguse) MollaKadima oppositionThird reading7against
Majallie WhbeeKadima oppositionThird reading9no record
Israel HassonKadima oppositionThird reading4no record
Mohammad BarakehHadash oppositionThird reading1against
Afou AgbariaHadash oppositionThird reading9no record
Nino AbesadzeKadima oppositionThird reading4against
Limor LivnatLikud coalitionThird reading4no record
Hanna SwaidHadash oppositionThird reading4no record
Ahmad TibiRa'am–Ta'al oppositionThird reading7no record
Talab El-SanaRa'am–Ta'al oppositionThird reading6no record
Eitan CabelLabor oppositionThird reading5no record
Isaac HerzogLabor oppositionThird reading2no record
Avishay BravermanLabor oppositionThird reading5no record
גאלב מג'אדלה (העבודה)—Third reading4—
Daniel Ben SimonLabor oppositionThird reading4no record
Zehava GalonMeretz oppositionThird reading2against
Ilan GilonMeretz oppositionThird reading1against
Nitzan HorowitzMeretz oppositionThird reading6against
Jamal ZahalkaBalad oppositionThird reading4no record
Yaakov (Katzeleh) KatzNational Union oppositionThird reading8no record
Yohanan PlesnerKadima oppositionThird reading1no record
Uzi LandauYisrael Beytenu coalitionThird reading1for

An automatic summary of the plenum transcripts: the debate on the bill at every reading it was voted on. Arguments are given as the speakers made them; this is not an assessment. The list of speakers comes from the transcript, without a model. Transcripts of the sittings: 1, 2, 3

Reservations to the second reading

14 reservations were filed: proposed changes to the text the committee brought to the second and third reading.

The reservations to Section 2 seek to limit and supervise the mechanism for prohibiting publication of a suspect's name - to repeal the possibility of permission on the basis of public interest, to limit the duration of the ban and to require a hearing with the parties present with the participation of the Press Council, and to direct the notification duty only to a detained suspect who is unrepresented; the reservations to Section 3 seek additional changes to the procedure for hearing requests, such as repealing the hearing before a single judge and wording changes.

automatic translation · suggest a correction

Hebrew original

ההסתייגויות לסעיף 2 מבקשות להגביל ולפקח על מנגנון איסור פרסום שם חשוד - לבטל את אפשרות ההיתר על בסיס עניין ציבורי, להגביל את משך האיסור ולחייב דיון במעמד הצדדים בהשתתפות מועצת העיתונות, וכן לכוון את חובת היידוע לחשוד עצור שאינו מיוצג בלבד; ההסתייגויות לסעיף 3 מבקשות שינויים נוספים בהליך הדיון בבקשות, כגון ביטול הדיון לפני דן יחיד ושינויי ניסוח.

By faction

  • Meretz opposition · 12 reservations · 3 members
  • Kadima opposition · 12 reservations · 2 members
  • Yisrael Beytenu coalition · 2 reservations · 1 member

A joint reservation counts for every faction whose members filed it.

Who proposed what
  • זהבה גלאון, אילן גילאון, ניצן הורוביץ, נחמן שי ושלמה מולה · 12
    Their reservations seek to repeal the court's authority to permit publication of a suspect's name on the basis of public interest, to limit the period of the publication ban to seven days with a limited possibility of extension, to require a hearing with the parties present within seven days and to summon the Press Council and public bodies to that hearing, to repeal the provision that requests be heard before a single judge, and to change the wording of the sections ("notwithstanding the foregoing" instead of "notwithstanding the provisions", and "ordered" instead of "commanded"), including parallel amendments to the Military Justice Law.
    Sections: לסעיף 2, לסעיף 3
  • יצחק אהרונוביץ · 2
    His reservation seeks to establish that the duty to notify a suspect of his right to request a ban on publication of his name will apply only to a detained suspect who is unrepresented, and within a time frame of 24 hours from his arrest or before he is brought before a judge, including a parallel amendment to the Military Justice Law.
    Sections: לסעיף 2

Proposers and reservation numbers are extracted automatically from the committee version, and the count is checked against the numbers printed in it. The descriptions are an automatic summary. The reservation numbers in this document cannot be read as text, so the count was not checked against it automatically. Committee version for the second and third reading (PDF)

Reservations, sections and other votes (8)

In order. Votes on reservations and individual sections are shown separately from the vote on the bill as a whole.

Source: bill page in the Knesset legislation database ↗

Law of Courts (Amendment No. 69), 2012 · How the Knesset Votes