Government bill · 18th Knesset · published as law 18 January 2012
חוק בתי המשפט (תיקון מס' 69), התשע"ב-2012Law of Courts (Amendment No. 69), 2012 · automatic translation · suggest a correction
Status: התקבלה בקריאה שלישית
Topics: Labor and wages*, Military and defense*, Courts and criminal law* · * from the Knesset's official law classification
What the sponsors propose
The bill seeks to amend Section 70 of the Courts Law and to add Sections 70a through 70d, which establish that, as a rule, the name of a suspect against whom an indictment has not yet been filed shall not be published for 48 hours from the time he was informed of the existence of an investigation against him, or until the first hearing in his matter, whichever is earlier, in order to allow him to petition the court and request a gag order on the publication of his name. According to the sponsors, in practice a suspect's name is sometimes published before he has had the opportunity to request a publication ban, which empties his right of content and may cause him irreversible harm, particularly when it later turns out that the suspicion was mistaken. The proposal establishes exceptions to the rule, including cases of public interest in publication or urgent investigative need, and also regulates the subject-matter and territorial jurisdiction of the courts to hear these requests and the possibility of appealing decisions regarding publication.
automatic translation · suggest a correction
Hebrew original
הצעת החוק מבקשת לתקן את סעיף 70 לחוק בתי המשפט ולהוסיף סעיפים 70א עד 70ד, הקובעים כי ככלל לא יפורסם שמו של חשוד שטרם הוגש נגדו כתב אישום במשך 48 שעות מהמועד שבו הודע לו על קיום חקירה נגדו, או עד לדיון הראשון בעניינו, לפי המוקדם, וזאת כדי לאפשר לו לפנות לבית המשפט ולבקש איסור פרסום שמו. לדברי המציעים, בפועל לעתים מתפרסם שמו של חשוד בטרם הספיק לבקש איסור פרסום, דבר המרוקן מתוכן את זכותו ועלול לגרום לו נזק בלתי הפיך, בעיקר כשמתברר בהמשך כי החשד היה מוטעה. ההצעה קובעת חריגים לכלל, לרבות מקרים של עניין ציבורי בפרסום או צורך חקירתי דחוף, וכן מסדירה את הסמכות העניינית והמקומית של בתי המשפט לדון בבקשות אלה ואת האפשרות לערער על ההחלטות בעניין פרסום.
An automatic summary of the explanatory notes written by the bill's sponsors. These are their arguments, not an official Knesset summary. · The bill on the Knesset website
Readings
- 12 July 2010 · First reading · להעביר את הצעת החוק לוועדההצעת חוק בתי המשפט (תיקון מס' 60) (איסור פרסום), התש"ע-2010Bill on Courts (Amendment No. 60) (Publication Prohibition), 2010autoBill passed first reading9 for · 0 against
- 2 January 2012 · Third readingהצעת חוק בתי המשפט (תיקון מס' 69), התשע"ב-2012Bill for the Courts Law (Amendment No. 69), 2012autoLaw passed16 for · 0 against
- 9 January 2012 · Third reading · אישור החוקהצעת חוק בתי המשפט (תיקון מס' 69), התשע"ב-2012Bill for the Courts Law (Amendment No. 69), 2012autoLaw passed21 for · 8 against
What was said in the plenum
The law stipulates that, as a rule, the name of a suspect against whom no indictment has yet been filed will not be published for 48 hours from the time they learned of the investigation, or until a hearing in their case, subject to exceptions such as public interest, urgent investigative need, or the suspect's consent. The first-reading discussion focused on whether the arrangement adequately protects the presumption of innocence and the privacy of suspects, while the second and third readings were conducted mainly against the backdrop of a broader confrontation between the coalition and the opposition over laws concerning the justice system, in which opponents of the law argued that it harms freedom of the press and the public's right to know.
automatic translation · suggest a correction
Hebrew original
החוק קובע כי ככלל לא יתפרסם שמו של חשוד שטרם הוגש נגדו כתב-אישום במשך 48 שעות מהמועד שבו נודע לו על החקירה, או עד לדיון בעניינו, בכפוף לחריגים כגון עניין ציבורי, צורך חקירתי דחוף או הסכמת החשוד. הדיון בקריאה הראשונה התמקד בשאלה אם ההסדר מגן כראוי על חזקת החפות ועל פרטיות חשודים, ובקריאה השנייה והשלישית התנהל בעיקר על רקע עימות רחב יותר בין הקואליציה לאופוזיציה סביב חוקים הנוגעים למערכת המשפט, שבמסגרתו טענו מתנגדי החוק כי הוא פוגע בחופש העיתונות ובזכות הציבור לדעת.
Arguments for
- Immediate publication of a suspect's name before he has had an opportunity to turn to the court and request a publication ban causes him irreversible harm, especially when it later turns out that the suspicion was mistaken.
- A short delay in publication gives the suspect a fair opportunity to defend himself and to exercise his right to dignity and good name in accordance with the principle of the presumption of innocence.Dov Khenin (Hadash)
- The law establishes balanced exceptions allowing publication when there is public interest, an urgent investigative need, the need to locate suspects or witnesses, or the suspect's own consent.שר המשפטים יעקב נאמן, David Rotem (Yisrael Beytenu)
- Providing accurate and focused information about the specific suspect, instead of delaying publication, which causes rumor-mongering and harmful generalization toward entire groups of similar people, also protects other suspects who are not involved.Shlomo (Neguse) Molla (Kadima)
Arguments against
- The bill turns the public and exceptional publication - a publication ban - into the norm, in a way that will mainly serve public figures and wealthy individuals capable of influencing the law enforcement system, and will become a tool for cover-up and whitewashing at the expense of the public and equality before the law.Zehava Galon (Meretz)
- Immediate publication of arrests and investigations is an important safeguard against investigations conducted in secrecy, miscarriages of justice and wrongful convictions, and at times only such publication has extricated an innocent person from a flawed proceeding or encouraged additional complainants to come forward and testify.Zehava Galon (Meretz), Nitzan Horowitz (Meretz)
- The law harms freedom of the press and the public's right to know, and reverses the burden so that the press will have to request the removal of a publication ban instead of publication being the rule.Zehava Galon (Meretz), Nitzan Horowitz (Meretz)
- The bill is another part of a series of laws intended to narrow the democratic space and restrict basic rights, and stems from the personal agenda of the bill's sponsors.
Who spoke (29)
| Member | Faction | Readings | Speeches | In the final vote |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| שר המשפטים יעקב נאמן | — | First reading | 2 | no record |
| Dov Khenin | Hadash opposition | First reading, Third reading | 4 | against |
| David Rotem | Yisrael Beytenu coalition | Third reading | 11 | for |
| Tzipi Livni | Kadima opposition | Third reading | 2 | no record |
| Yoel Hasson | Kadima opposition | Third reading | 4 | no record |
| Zeev Bielski | Kadima opposition | Third reading | 6 | no record |
| Nachman Shai | Kadima opposition | Third reading | 11 | no record |
| Shlomo (Neguse) Molla | Kadima opposition | Third reading | 7 | against |
| Majallie Whbee | Kadima opposition | Third reading | 9 | no record |
| Israel Hasson | Kadima opposition | Third reading | 4 | no record |
| Mohammad Barakeh | Hadash opposition | Third reading | 1 | against |
| Afou Agbaria | Hadash opposition | Third reading | 9 | no record |
| Nino Abesadze | Kadima opposition | Third reading | 4 | against |
| Limor Livnat | Likud coalition | Third reading | 4 | no record |
| Hanna Swaid | Hadash opposition | Third reading | 4 | no record |
| Ahmad Tibi | Ra'am–Ta'al opposition | Third reading | 7 | no record |
| Talab El-Sana | Ra'am–Ta'al opposition | Third reading | 6 | no record |
| Eitan Cabel | Labor opposition | Third reading | 5 | no record |
| Isaac Herzog | Labor opposition | Third reading | 2 | no record |
| Avishay Braverman | Labor opposition | Third reading | 5 | no record |
| גאלב מג'אדלה (העבודה) | — | Third reading | 4 | — |
| Daniel Ben Simon | Labor opposition | Third reading | 4 | no record |
| Zehava Galon | Meretz opposition | Third reading | 2 | against |
| Ilan Gilon | Meretz opposition | Third reading | 1 | against |
| Nitzan Horowitz | Meretz opposition | Third reading | 6 | against |
| Jamal Zahalka | Balad opposition | Third reading | 4 | no record |
| Yaakov (Katzeleh) Katz | National Union opposition | Third reading | 8 | no record |
| Yohanan Plesner | Kadima opposition | Third reading | 1 | no record |
| Uzi Landau | Yisrael Beytenu coalition | Third reading | 1 | for |
An automatic summary of the plenum transcripts: the debate on the bill at every reading it was voted on. Arguments are given as the speakers made them; this is not an assessment. The list of speakers comes from the transcript, without a model. Transcripts of the sittings: 1, 2, 3
Reservations to the second reading
14 reservations were filed: proposed changes to the text the committee brought to the second and third reading.
The reservations to Section 2 seek to limit and supervise the mechanism for prohibiting publication of a suspect's name - to repeal the possibility of permission on the basis of public interest, to limit the duration of the ban and to require a hearing with the parties present with the participation of the Press Council, and to direct the notification duty only to a detained suspect who is unrepresented; the reservations to Section 3 seek additional changes to the procedure for hearing requests, such as repealing the hearing before a single judge and wording changes.
automatic translation · suggest a correction
Hebrew original
ההסתייגויות לסעיף 2 מבקשות להגביל ולפקח על מנגנון איסור פרסום שם חשוד - לבטל את אפשרות ההיתר על בסיס עניין ציבורי, להגביל את משך האיסור ולחייב דיון במעמד הצדדים בהשתתפות מועצת העיתונות, וכן לכוון את חובת היידוע לחשוד עצור שאינו מיוצג בלבד; ההסתייגויות לסעיף 3 מבקשות שינויים נוספים בהליך הדיון בבקשות, כגון ביטול הדיון לפני דן יחיד ושינויי ניסוח.
By faction
- Meretz opposition · 12 reservations · 3 members
- Kadima opposition · 12 reservations · 2 members
- Yisrael Beytenu coalition · 2 reservations · 1 member
A joint reservation counts for every faction whose members filed it.
Who proposed what
- זהבה גלאון, אילן גילאון, ניצן הורוביץ, נחמן שי ושלמה מולה · 12Their reservations seek to repeal the court's authority to permit publication of a suspect's name on the basis of public interest, to limit the period of the publication ban to seven days with a limited possibility of extension, to require a hearing with the parties present within seven days and to summon the Press Council and public bodies to that hearing, to repeal the provision that requests be heard before a single judge, and to change the wording of the sections ("notwithstanding the foregoing" instead of "notwithstanding the provisions", and "ordered" instead of "commanded"), including parallel amendments to the Military Justice Law.Sections: לסעיף 2, לסעיף 3
- יצחק אהרונוביץ · 2His reservation seeks to establish that the duty to notify a suspect of his right to request a ban on publication of his name will apply only to a detained suspect who is unrepresented, and within a time frame of 24 hours from his arrest or before he is brought before a judge, including a parallel amendment to the Military Justice Law.Sections: לסעיף 2
Proposers and reservation numbers are extracted automatically from the committee version, and the count is checked against the numbers printed in it. The descriptions are an automatic summary. The reservation numbers in this document cannot be read as text, so the count was not checked against it automatically. Committee version for the second and third reading (PDF)
Reservations, sections and other votes (8)
In order. Votes on reservations and individual sections are shown separately from the vote on the bill as a whole.
- 2 January 2012 · Second readingהצעת חוק בתי המשפט (תיקון מס' 69), התשע"ב-2012Bill for the Courts Law (Amendment No. 69), 2012auto15 for · 0 againstVote on sections of the bill
- 9 January 2012 · Stage unknown · הצבעההצעת חוק בתי המשפט (תיקון מס' 69), התשע"ב-2012Bill for the Courts Law (Amendment No. 69), 2012auto21 for · 8 againstQuestion type unknown
- 9 January 2012 · Second reading · הסתייגותהצעת חוק בתי המשפט (תיקון מס' 69), התשע"ב-2012Bill for the Courts Law (Amendment No. 69), 2012auto7 for · 22 againstVote on a reservation (amendment)
- 9 January 2012 · Stage unknown · הצבעההצעת חוק בתי המשפט (תיקון מס' 69), התשע"ב-2012Bill for the Courts Law (Amendment No. 69), 2012auto8 for · 22 againstQuestion type unknown
- 9 January 2012 · Stage unknown · הצבעההצעת חוק בתי המשפט (תיקון מס' 69), התשע"ב-2012Bill for the Courts Law (Amendment No. 69), 2012auto8 for · 21 againstQuestion type unknown
- 9 January 2012 · Second reading · הסתייגותהצעת חוק בתי המשפט (תיקון מס' 69), התשע"ב-2012Bill for the Courts Law (Amendment No. 69), 2012auto22 for · 6 againstVote on a reservation (amendment)
- 9 January 2012 · Not a legislative reading · הצעת ועדההצעת חוק בתי המשפט (תיקון מס' 69), התשע"ב-2012Bill for the Courts Law (Amendment No. 69), 2012auto21 for · 8 againstProcedural decision
- 27 February 2012 · Not a legislative reading · החלטה בדברהחלטת ועדת החוקה, חוק ומשפט בדבר תיקון טעות בחוק בתי המשפט (תיקון מס' 69), התשע"ב-2012 - הצבעהDecision of the Constitution, Law and Justice Committee on Correcting an Error in the Law of Courts (Amendment No. 69), 2012 - Voteauto13 for · 0 againstOther decision