Government bill · 25th Knesset · published as law 21 July 2024

חוק מניעת פגיעת גוף שידורים זר בביטחון המדינה (הוראת שעה – חרבות ברזל) (תיקון), התשפ"ד–2024Law on Prevention of Harm to a Foreign Broadcasting Authority in the Security of the State (temporary provision – Iron Swords) (Amendment), 2024 · automatic translation · suggest a correction

Status: התקבלה בקריאה שלישית

Topics: Military and defense*, Communications, media and technology*, Emergency, war and COVID · * from the Knesset's official law classification · no asterisk — automatically from words in the title

Official summary of the law (Knesset)

On 2 April 2024, the Law for the Prevention of Harm to State Security by a Foreign Broadcasting Entity (Temporary Provision – Swords of Iron), 2024, was published, establishing as a temporary provision for four months, until the end of the declaration of a special situation on the home front or until the end of significant military operations, whichever is earlier, that if the Prime Minister is convinced that content broadcast on a foreign channel broadcasting in Israel materially harms state security, the Minister of Communications shall be authorized, with the consent of the Prime Minister and the approval of the Ministerial Committee on National Security Affairs or the government, to order actions to prevent or stop the activity of the foreign channel, including closing the channel's offices located in Israel. This order shall be given after at least one professional opinion from security officials is presented to the Prime Minister and the Minister of Communications; provided that before the approval of the Ministerial Committee on National Security Affairs or the government, the opinions of the security officials shall be presented to it. It was further established that these provisions shall be valid for forty-five days, with the possibility of extending this period for an identical period at most each time, subject, among other things, to the presentation of a professional opinion as stated. It was also established that an order by the Minister of Communications as stated, and in particular its extension, shall be brought before the president of a district court or their deputy as soon as possible for judicial review, within which it will be decided whether to change it. As part of the amendment, the aforementioned temporary provision was extended until 30 November 2024.

automatic translation · suggest a correction

Hebrew original

ביום כ"ג באדר ב' התשפ"ד (2 באפריל 2024), פורסם חוק מניעת פגיעת גוף שידורים זר בביטחון המדינה (הוראת שעה – חרבות ברזל), התשפ"ד–2024, במסגרתו נקבע כהוראת שעה לארבעה חודשים, עד מועד סיום ההכרזה על מצב מיוחד בעורף או עד לסיום הפעולות הצבאיות המשמעותיות, לפי המוקדם שבהם, כי במידה וראש הממשלה שוכנע כי התכנים המשודרים בערוץ זר המשדר בישראל פוגעים באופן ממשי בביטחון המדינה, שר התקשורת יהיה רשאי, בהסכמת ראש הממשלה ובאישור ועדת השרים לענייני ביטחון לאומי או הממשלה להורות על פעולות למניעת או הפסקת פעילות של ערוץ זר, לרבות סגירת משרדי הערוץ הנמצאים בישראל. הוראה זו תינתן לאחר שתוצג בפני ראש הממשלה ושר התקשורת חוות דעת מקצועית אחת לפחות מגורמי הביטחון; ובלבד שטרם אישורה של ועדת השרים לענייני ביטחון לאומי או הממשלה, יוצגו בפניה חוות הדעת מטעם גורמי הביטחון. עוד נקבע כי תוקף הוראות אלו יהיה למשך ארבעים וחמישה ימים, לצד אפשרות להאריך תקופה זו לתקופה זהה לכל היותר בכל פעם, בכפוף, בין היתר, להצגת חוות דעת מקצועית כאמור. כמו כן, נקבע כי הוראה של שר התקשורת כאמור, ובפרט הארכתה, תובא לפני נשיא בית משפט מחוזי או סגנו בהקדם האפשרי לטובת ביקורת שיפוטית, במסגרתה יחליט האם לשנותה. במסגרת התיקון, הוארכה הוראת השעה כאמור עד ליום כ"ט בחשוון התשפ"ה (30 בנובמבר 2024).

Readings

What was said in the plenum

The bill seeks to extend by four additional months (until 30 November 2024) the temporary provision allowing the Minister of Communications, with the agreement of the Prime Minister and the approval of the government or the Cabinet, to restrict the activity of a foreign broadcasting body that causes real harm to state security, an arrangement that was used to halt Al Jazeera's broadcasts in Israel. The discussion focused mainly on the extension of this tool itself and its effectiveness, while many of the speakers used the platform for broader discussions unrelated to the substance of the law, such as the war, conscription, coalition-opposition relations, and the situation in the north and south.

automatic translation · suggest a correction

Hebrew original

הצעת החוק מבקשת להאריך בארבעה חודשים נוספים (עד 30 בנובמבר 2024) את הוראת השעה המאפשרת לשר התקשורת, בהסכמת ראש הממשלה ובאישור הממשלה או הקבינט, להגביל פעילותו של גוף שידור זר הפוגע פגיעה ממשית בביטחון המדינה, הסדר ששימש להפסקת שידורי אל-ג'זירה בישראל. הדיון נסב בעיקר על עצם הארכת הכלי הזה ועל יעילותו, בעוד חלק גדול מהנואמים ניצלו את הבמה לדיונים נרחבים שלא נגעו לגוף החוק, כגון המלחמה, הגיוס, יחסי הקואליציה-אופוזיציה והמצב בצפון ובדרום.

Arguments for

  • The authority should be extended to allow the state to continue protecting its security by shutting down foreign broadcasting bodies that incite and harm state security, as proven by its use against Al Jazeera.
    Shlomo Karhi (Likud), Tzvika Foghel (Otzma Yehudit)
  • Consideration should be given to expanding the tools in the law, such as the authority to also block live broadcasts on social networks, in order to address existing loopholes in the arrangement.
    Shlomo Karhi (Likud)
  • The committee examined the arrangement in balancing the security need against freedom of expression and the press, and found a factual basis establishing the need to continue the restriction.
    Tzvika Foghel (Otzma Yehudit)
  • Support for the law is broad and crosses coalition-opposition lines, since matters concerning state security are above political dispute.
    Shlomo Karhi (Likud), Zeev Elkin (New Hope)

Arguments against

  • Shutting down Al Jazeera does not constitute a real achievement, since it mainly harms Arab citizens who consume it and does not prevent the public or the world from obtaining information about what is happening in Gaza through other means.
    Aida Touma Sliman (Hadash–Ta'al), Ayman Odeh (Hadash–Ta'al)
  • The restriction on a broadcasting body is part of a broader process of undermining freedom of expression and silencing critical voices, which may further expand to other media outlets and laws.
    Aida Touma Sliman (Hadash–Ta'al)
Who spoke (45)
MemberFactionReadingsSpeechesIn the final vote
Shlomo KarhiLikud coalitionFirst reading1for
Debbie BitonYesh Atid oppositionFirst reading1no record
Matan KahanaNational Unity oppositionFirst reading1no record
Elazar SternYesh Atid oppositionFirst reading1no record
Meir CohenYesh Atid oppositionFirst reading1no record
Iman Khatib YassinRa'am oppositionFirst reading1against
Oded ForerYisrael Beytenu oppositionFirst reading1no record
Vladimir BeliakYesh Atid oppositionFirst reading1no record
Yoav SegalovitzYesh Atid oppositionFirst reading1no record
Ahmad TibiHadash–Ta'al oppositionFirst reading1against
Hamad AmarYisrael Beytenu oppositionFirst reading1no record
Meirav CohenYesh Atid oppositionFirst reading1no record
Aida Touma SlimanHadash–Ta'al oppositionFirst reading1against
Waleed AlhwashlaRa'am oppositionFirst reading1against
Idan RollYesh Atid oppositionFirst reading1no record
Ron KatzYesh Atid oppositionFirst reading1no record
Naor ShiriYesh Atid oppositionFirst reading1no record
Avi MaozNoam coalitionFirst reading1no record
Galit Distel AtbaryanLikud coalitionFirst reading1no record
Tsega MelakuLikud coalitionFirst reading1for
Simon DavidsonYesh Atid oppositionFirst reading1no record
Merav Ben AriYesh Atid oppositionFirst reading1for
Osher ShkalimLikud coalitionFirst reading1for
Sharren Miriam HaskelNew Hope oppositionFirst reading1no record
Tally GotlivLikud coalitionFirst reading1no record
Yorai Lahav HertzanuYesh Atid oppositionFirst reading1no record
Michael Mordechai BitonNational Unity oppositionFirst reading1no record
Pnina TamenoNational Unity oppositionFirst reading1no record
Yaron LeviYesh Atid oppositionFirst reading1no record
Amit HaleviLikud coalitionFirst reading2no record
Alon SchusterNational Unity oppositionFirst reading1no record
Yasir HujeiratRa'am oppositionFirst reading1no record
Tatiana MazarskyYesh Atid oppositionFirst reading1no record
Sharon NirYisrael Beytenu oppositionFirst reading1no record
Mickey LevyYesh Atid oppositionFirst reading1no record
Matti Sarfatti HarcaviYesh Atid oppositionFirst reading1no record
Evgeny SovaYisrael Beytenu oppositionFirst reading1no record
Gilad KarivLabor oppositionFirst reading1no record
Michal Miriam WoldigerReligious Zionism coalitionFirst reading1no record
Moshe TurpazYesh Atid oppositionFirst reading1no record
Yasmin FridmanYesh Atid oppositionFirst reading1no record
Ariel KallnerLikud coalitionFirst reading1for
Ayman OdehHadash–Ta'al oppositionFirst reading1against
Zeev ElkinNew Hope oppositionFirst reading1for
Tzvika FoghelOtzma Yehudit coalitionThird reading1for

An automatic summary of the plenum transcripts: the debate on the bill at every reading it was voted on. Arguments are given as the speakers made them; this is not an assessment. The list of speakers comes from the transcript, without a model. Transcripts of the sittings: 1, 2 · write to the author

Reservations to the second reading

3 reservations were filed: proposed changes to the text the committee brought to the second and third reading.

The reservations concern the expiration date of the temporary provision, whether by extending it for a longer period or by conditioning it on various political and security conditions, including the return of hostages, the end of the war, or assistance to war victims, as opposed to a proposal to shorten its validity and condition it on a hostage deal.

automatic translation · suggest a correction

Hebrew original

ההסתייגויות נסבות על מועד סיום תוקפה של הוראת השעה, בין אם בהארכתה לתקופה ממושכת יותר ובין אם בהתנייתה בתנאים מדיניים וביטחוניים שונים, לרבות הפניית חטופים, סיום המלחמה או סיוע לנפגעי המלחמה, לעומת הצעה לקיצור תוקפה והתנייתה בעסקת חטופים.

By faction

  • Yesh Atid opposition · 2 reservations · 24 members
  • New Hope opposition · 1 reservation · 4 members

A joint reservation counts for every faction whose members filed it.

Who proposed what

Asked to speak: Mansour Abbas (Ra'am), Waleed Taha (Ra'am), Waleed Alhwashla (Ra'am), Iman Khatib Yassin (Ra'am), Yasir Hujeirat (Ra'am), Benjamin Gantz (National Unity), Gadi Eisenkot (National Unity), Pnina Tameno (National Unity), Chili Tropper (National Unity), Michael Mordechai Biton (National Unity), Matan Kahana (National Unity), Orit Farkash Hacohen (National Unity), Alon Schuster (National Unity), Ayman Odeh (Hadash–Ta'al), Ahmad Tibi (Hadash–Ta'al), Aida Touma Sliman (Hadash–Ta'al), Ofer Cassif (Hadash–Ta'al), Youssef Atauna (Hadash–Ta'al)

Proposers and reservation numbers are extracted automatically from the committee version, and the count is checked against the numbers printed in it. The descriptions are an automatic summary. Committee version for the second and third reading (PDF) · write to the author

Reservations, sections and other votes (1)

In order. Votes on reservations and individual sections are shown separately from the vote on the bill as a whole.

Source: bill page in the Knesset legislation database ↗

Law on Prevention of Harm to a Foreign Broadcasting Authority in the Security of the State (temporary provision – Iron Swords) (Amendment), 2024 · How the Knesset Votes