Government bill · 25th Knesset · published as law 27 June 2024

חוק לתיקון פקודת סדר הדין הפלילי (מעצר וחיפוש) (מס' 17), התשפ"ד–2024Law to Amend the Criminal Procedure (Arrest and Search) Ordinance (No. 17), 2024 · automatic translation · suggest a correction

Status: התקבלה בקריאה שלישית

Topics: Military and defense*, Police and internal security*, Courts and criminal law* · * from the Knesset's official law classification

Official summary of the law (Knesset)

Under the Law for Combating Illegal Weapons (Legislative Amendment and Temporary Provision), 2023, an amendment was made to the Criminal Procedure Ordinance (Arrest and Search) [New Version], 1969 (hereinafter – the Ordinance), under which two new grounds were added for conducting a search without a judicial warrant, in order to provide the police with effective enforcement tools to eradicate the phenomenon of illegal weapons. The first ground added allows a police officer to conduct a search without a judicial warrant if there is a reasonable suspicion that a weapon or a substantial part of a weapon, which may serve as evidence of an offense, is located at a place, and if, due to the immediate need to conduct the search, a warrant cannot be obtained. The second ground added allows the police to conduct a search of recordings or a camera that may serve as evidence of an offense punishable by at least ten years' imprisonment, including a weapons offense, an offense of shooting at a residential area, or an offense of extortion by threats. Regarding both of these grounds, it was determined that the search will only be conducted with written authorization from a police officer with the rank of chief superintendent or higher, which will include the circumstances and reasons for the need for an immediate search without a warrant. It was further determined that if, during the search, an item unrelated to the offense for which the authorization to conduct the search was given is discovered, the police officer may seize the item and bring it before a judge, who will decide what is to be done with it. These arrangements were established as a temporary provision for a period of one year, commencing 15 May 2023, in order to allow for an examination of the proposed arrangements. Under Amendment No. 17 to the Ordinance, it was determined that the aforementioned temporary provision would be extended by one additional year, until 30 June 2025.

automatic translation · suggest a correction

Hebrew original

במסגרת חוק המאבק בכלי הנשק הבלתי חוקיים (תיקון חקיקה והוראת שעה), התשפ"ג–2023, נעשה תיקון לפקודת סדר הדין הפלילי (מעצר וחיפוש) [נוסח חדש], התשכ"ט–1969 (להלן – הפקודה), לפיו נוספו שתי עילות חדשות לביצוע חיפוש ללא צו שופט במטרה להקנות למשטרה כלי אכיפה יעילים למיגור תופעת כלי הנשק הבלתי חוקיים. העילה הראשונה שנוספה מאפשרת לשוטר לבצע חיפוש ללא צו שופט אם התעורר חשד סביר שכלי נשק או חלק מהותי מנשק, שעשוי לשמש ראיה לביצוע עבירה, נמצא במקום, ואם בשל הצורך המיידי לביצוע החיפוש לא ניתן לקבל צו. העילה השנייה שנוספה מאפשרת למשטרה לבצע חיפוש של תיעוד או מצלמה שעשויים לשמש ראיה לביצוע עבירה שדינה עשר שנות מאסר לפחות, הכוללת עבירת נשק, עבירה של ירי במקום מגורים או עבירת סחיטה באיומים. לגבי שתי עילות אלו, נקבע כי החיפוש יבוצע רק באישור בכתב של קצין משטרה בדרגת רב-פקד ומעלה, שיכלול את הנסיבות והנימוקים לצורך בחיפוש מיידי ללא צו. עוד נקבע כי אם במהלך החיפוש נתגלה חפץ שאינו נוגע לעבירה שבשלה ניתן האישור לביצוע החיפוש, השוטר יהיה רשאי לתפוס את החפץ ולהביאו לבחינת שופט, אשר יחליט מה ייעשה בו. הסדרים אלו נקבעו כהוראת שעה לתקופה של שנה, החל מיום כ"ד באייר התשפ"ג (15 במאי 2023), זאת בכדי לאפשר בחינה של ההסדרים המוצעים. במסגרת תיקון מספר 17 לפקודה, נקבע כי הוראת השעה כאמור תוארך בשנה אחת, עד ליום ד' בתמוז התשפ"ה (30 ביוני 2025).

Readings

What was said in the plenum

The bill seeks to extend a temporary provision granting the police (and military police) the authority to conduct a search of a home without a judge's warrant on suspicion of illegal weapons or documentation/a camera related to a serious crime, with the aim of combating crime and illegal weapons, primarily in Arab society. The debate focused on the actual effectiveness of the authority versus concerns about harm to individual rights and its use without judicial review, and the committee decided to extend the arrangement for only one year instead of the two years requested, with enhanced reporting requirements.

automatic translation · suggest a correction

Hebrew original

הצעת החוק מבקשת להאריך הוראת שעה המעניקה למשטרה (ולשוטר צבאי) סמכות לבצע חיפוש בבית ללא צו שופט בחשד לנשק בלתי חוקי או לתיעוד/מצלמה הקשור לפשע חמור, במטרה להילחם בפשיעה ובנשק הבלתי חוקי, בעיקר בחברה הערבית. הדיון נסב על יעילות הסמכות בפועל לעומת החשש מפגיעה בזכויות הפרט ומהפעלתה בלא ביקורת שיפוטית, ובוועדה הוחלט להאריך את ההסדר בשנה אחת בלבד במקום השנתיים שהתבקשו, עם חובות דיווח מוגברות.

Arguments for

  • The authority is needed to allow the police to seize illegal weapons and documentation before evidence is destroyed, in light of rising crime, particularly in Arab society.
    Idit Silman, Tzvika Foghel (Otzma Yehudit)
  • Operation Gideon's Chariots diverted significant police resources, so it was not possible to properly utilize and examine the tool, and additional time is needed to evaluate it.
    Idit Silman, Tzvika Foghel (Otzma Yehudit)
  • Restrictions and oversight mechanisms (officer approval, documentation, reporting to the Legal Advisor and to the Knesset) were established, justifying the continued exercise of the authority while it is examined.
    Idit Silman, Tzvika Foghel (Otzma Yehudit)

Arguments against

  • The data show that most searches conducted without a warrant did not yield results (weapons or an indictment), which raises doubts about the necessity and effectiveness of the arrangement.
    Ofer Cassif (Hadash–Ta'al), Aida Touma Sliman (Hadash–Ta'al)
  • Granting authority to conduct searches without a judge's warrant and without judicial review harms individual rights and constitutes a draconian power placed in the hands of a police force that does not operate with sufficient professionalism and transparency.
    Ofer Cassif (Hadash–Ta'al), Aida Touma Sliman (Hadash–Ta'al)
  • Warrantless searches cause distress, fear and economic burden to families affected by searches that yield no results, and at times people are arrested unrelated to the weapons matter.
    Aida Touma Sliman (Hadash–Ta'al)
  • The government is concealing material data from the public, such as in which communities and against which public the authority is being used, and has rejected proposals to improve oversight and transparency regarding its use.
    Ofer Cassif (Hadash–Ta'al)
  • The law does not solve the root problem of crime and illegal weapons in Arab society, and constitutes an admission of the failure of government policy in combating crime rather than an effective tool against it.
Who spoke (12)
MemberFactionReadingsSpeechesIn the final vote
Idit Silman—First reading1no record
Meirav CohenYesh Atid oppositionFirst reading1no record
Gilad KarivLabor oppositionFirst reading1no record
Ofer CassifHadash–Ta'al oppositionFirst reading, Third reading2against
Mansour AbbasRa'am oppositionFirst reading1against
Vladimir BeliakYesh Atid oppositionFirst reading1no record
Yasir HujeiratRa'am oppositionFirst reading1no record
Matti Sarfatti HarcaviYesh Atid oppositionFirst reading1no record
Amit HaleviLikud coalitionFirst reading1for
Tzvika FoghelOtzma Yehudit coalitionThird reading1for
Aida Touma SlimanHadash–Ta'al oppositionThird reading1against
Sharon NirYisrael Beytenu oppositionThird reading1for

An automatic summary of the plenum transcripts: the debate on the bill at every reading it was voted on. Arguments are given as the speakers made them; this is not an assessment. The list of speakers comes from the transcript, without a model. Transcripts of the sittings: 1, 2 · write to the author

Reservations to the second reading

2 reservations were filed: proposed changes to the text the committee brought to the second and third reading.

The reservations submitted by the Yesh Atid group are intended to change the start dates set in the law and to set earlier dates than those proposed.

automatic translation · suggest a correction

Hebrew original

ההסתייגויות שהוגשו על ידי קבוצת יש עתיד נועדו לשנות את מועדי התחילה הקבועים בחוק ולקבוע מועדים מוקדמים יותר מהמוצע.

By faction

  • Yesh Atid opposition · 2 reservations · 24 members

A joint reservation counts for every faction whose members filed it.

Who proposed what

Asked to speak: Ayman Odeh (Hadash–Ta'al), Ahmad Tibi (Hadash–Ta'al), Aida Touma Sliman (Hadash–Ta'al), Ofer Cassif (Hadash–Ta'al), Youssef Atauna (Hadash–Ta'al), Aryeh Machluf Deri (Shas), Yinon Azoulay (Shas), Yosef Taieb (Shas), Avraham Bezalel (Shas), Yonatan Mashriki (Shas), Erez Malul (Shas), Simon Moshiashvili (Shas), Avigdor Liberman (Yisrael Beytenu), Oded Forer (Yisrael Beytenu), Evgeny Sova (Yisrael Beytenu), Sharon Nir (Yisrael Beytenu), Yulia Malinovsky (Yisrael Beytenu), Hamad Amar (Yisrael Beytenu)

Proposers and reservation numbers are extracted automatically from the committee version, and the count is checked against the numbers printed in it. The descriptions are an automatic summary. Committee version for the second and third reading (PDF) · write to the author

Reservations, sections and other votes (1)

In order. Votes on reservations and individual sections are shown separately from the vote on the bill as a whole.

Source: bill page in the Knesset legislation database ↗

Law to Amend the Criminal Procedure (Arrest and Search) Ordinance (No. 17), 2024 · How the Knesset Votes