Government bill · 20th Knesset · published as law 11 March 2018
חוק הכניסה לישראל (תיקון מס' 30), התשע"ח-2018Law on Entry into Israel (Amendment No. 30), 2018 · automatic translation · suggest a correction
Status: התקבלה בקריאה שלישית
Topics: Aliyah, citizenship and immigration* · * from the Knesset's official law classification
Official summary of the law (Knesset)
This amendment clearly and specifically establishes the authority of the Minister of Interior to revoke a permanent residency permit on the grounds of breach of trust, further to his overall authority to revoke a residency permit in Israel under the current provisions of the Law. According to the proposal, revocation of a permanent residency permit on this ground, for someone whose parent held a permanent residency permit at the time of the person's birth, or for someone for whom more than 15 years have passed from the date they received the permit at the time the act was committed, will require the consent of the Minister of Justice and after consultation with an advisory committee established by the Minister of Interior. An administrative petition may be filed with the Administrative Affairs Court against the Minister of Interior's decision on this matter.
automatic translation · suggest a correction
Hebrew original
תיקון זה מעגן בצורה ברורה ומפורטת את סמכות שר הפנים לבטל רישיון לישיבת קבע בעילה של הפרת אמונים, זאת בהמשך לסמכותו הכוללת לביטול רישיון ישיבה בישראל לפי הוראות החוק כיום. לפי המוצע, ביטול רישיון לישיבת קבע בעילה זו למי שבעת לידתו היה אחד מהוריו בעל רישיון לישיבת קבע או למי שבעת ביצוע המעשה חלפו למעלה מ-15 שנים מהמועד שבו קיבל את הרישיון, יהיה בהסכמת שר המשפטים ולאחר התייעצות עם ועדה מייעצת שהקים שר הפנים. על החלטת שר הפנים בעניין זה ניתן יהיה להגיש עתירה מינהלית לבית המשפט לעניינים מינהליים.
Sponsors
Amir Ohana, Shuli Moalem-Refaeli, David Bitan, Yakov Margi, Tali Ploskov, Sharren Miriam Haskel, Oded Forer, Roy Folkman
Readings
- 26 February 2018 · First reading · להעביר את הצעת החוק לוועדההצעת חוק הכניסה לישראל (תיקון מס' 31) (ביטול רישיון לישיבת קבע), התשע"ח-2018Bill on Entry into Israel (Amendment No. 31) (Cancellation of Permanent Residence Permit), 2018autoBill passed first reading52 for · 11 against · 1 abst.
- 7 March 2018 · Third reading · אישור החוקהצעת חוק הכניסה לישראל (תיקון מס' 30), התשע"ח-2018Bill on Entry into Israel (Amendment No. 30), 2018autoLaw passed48 for · 18 against · 6 abst.
What was said in the plenum
The law, formulated following the Supreme Court ruling in the Abu Arfa case, adds a section to the Entry into Israel Law that explicitly enshrines the Minister of Interior's authority to revoke a permanent residency permit due to a breach of allegiance to the State of Israel, including for residents of East Jerusalem, subject to restrictions regarding those who have been permanent residents for more than 15 years or were born to a permanent resident parent, to consultation with the Minister of Justice and an advisory committee, and to the right to petition the Administrative Affairs Court. The discussion centered mainly on the question of whether this is a legitimate tool for fighting terrorism and implementing the Supreme Court's decision, or a discriminatory mechanism that creates distortion and constitutes an act of expulsion against East Jerusalem residents in violation of international law.
automatic translation · suggest a correction
Hebrew original
החוק, שגובש בעקבות פסיקת בג״ץ בעניין אבו ערפה, מוסיף לחוק הכניסה לישראל סעיף שמעגן במפורש את סמכות שר הפנים לשלול רישיון ישיבת קבע בשל הפרת אמונים למדינת ישראל, גם מתושבי מזרח ירושלים, בכפוף להגבלות על מי שתושב קבע מעל 15 שנה או נולד להורה תושב קבע, להתייעצות עם שר המשפטים וועדה מייעצת ולזכות עתירה לבית המשפט לעניינים מינהליים. הדיון נסב בעיקר על השאלה האם מדובר בכלי לגיטימי למלחמה בטרור ובהחלטת בג״ץ, או במנגנון המפלה ומייצר עיוות ומעשה של גירוש בניגוד למשפט הבין-לאומי נגד תושבי מזרח ירושלים.
Arguments for
- The law is required as a response to the Supreme Court ruling in the Abu Arfa case, which requires explicit and detailed authorization in law for revoking the permanent residency license of East Jerusalem residents due to breach of allegiance.Yoav Kisch (Likud)
- It cannot be that someone involved in terrorism and who harms the State of Israel continues to receive benefits and rights from it as a loyal citizen.Yoav Kisch (Likud), Amir Ohana (Likud)
- The proposal is proportionate and reasonable since it distinguishes between terrorists and ordinary permanent residents, and provides procedural safeguards such as consultation with the Minister of Justice, an advisory committee, and the right to petition the Administrative Affairs Court.Yoav Kisch (Likud), Amir Ohana (Likud)
- It is important that the elected Minister of Interior, and not the unelected legal advisor, hold the decisive discretion in these matters, since the public is sovereign.Amir Ohana (Likud)
- The State of Israel liberated Jerusalem in 1967, and its residents have rights and benefits that it is the one granting them, and therefore there is no place to criticize it on this matter.Yoav Kisch (Likud)
Arguments against
- This is legislation that creates a mechanism for expelling native residents from their homes, contrary to international law, which does not regard the annexation of East Jerusalem as a legal act.
- Residents of East Jerusalem, who are residents under occupation and did not choose Israeli citizenship, must not be required to have a duty of loyalty to a state that is not theirs and with which they have no legal connection.Dov Khenin (Joint List), Ahmad Tibi (Joint List), Abd Al Hakeem Haj Yahya (Joint List), Yousef Jabareen (Joint List), Joumah Azbarga (Joint List)
- The law is part of a systematic and ongoing policy (30 amendments to the law) aimed at thinning out the Palestinian population in East Jerusalem and discriminating against it, even without connection to criminal offenses, while anyone who has committed an offense can be prosecuted under the existing legal framework.
- The law exposes the overt discrimination, as it enshrines in law a situation in which residents of East Jerusalem do not receive citizenship and may even lose their residency, while the State of Israel, on the other hand, declares Jerusalem a unified city and its capital.Mossi Raz (Meretz)
- Maintaining such a law perpetuates the cycle of violence and prevents any possibility of a political solution and peace, as it constitutes a further step in abolishing the status of East Jerusalem as the capital of a future Palestinian state.
Who spoke (10)
| Member | Faction | Readings | Speeches | In the final vote |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yoav Kisch | Likud coalition | Third reading | 9 | for |
| Amir Ohana | Likud coalition | Third reading | 2 | for |
| Dov Khenin | Joint List opposition | Third reading | 9 | against |
| Jamal Zahalka | Joint List opposition | Third reading | 3 | against |
| Ahmad Tibi | Joint List opposition | Third reading | 3 | against |
| Abd Al Hakeem Haj Yahya | Joint List opposition | Third reading | 1 | against |
| Yousef Jabareen | Joint List opposition | Third reading | 3 | against |
| Joumah Azbarga | Joint List opposition | Third reading | 5 | against |
| Esawi Frej | Meretz opposition | Third reading | 4 | against |
| Mossi Raz | Meretz opposition | Third reading | 3 | against |
An automatic summary of the plenum transcripts: the debate on the bill at every reading it was voted on. Arguments are given as the speakers made them; this is not an assessment. The list of speakers comes from the transcript, without a model. Transcripts of the sittings: 1, 2
Reservations to the second reading
No reservations were filed to this bill.
Asked to speak: Amir Ohana (Likud), Bezalel Smotrich (Jewish Home), Ayman Odeh (Joint List), Masud Ganaim (Joint List), Jamal Zahalka (Joint List), Ahmad Tibi (Joint List), Aida Touma Sliman (Joint List), Abd Al Hakeem Haj Yahya (Joint List), Hanin Zoabi (Joint List), Dov Khenin (Joint List), Talab Abu Arar (Joint List), Yousef Jabareen (Joint List), Joumah Azbarga (Joint List), Saeed Alkharumi (Joint List), Wael Younis (Joint List), Isaac Herzog (Zionist Union), Tzipi Livni (Zionist Union), Shelly Yachimovich (Zionist Union), Stav Shaffir (Zionist Union), Itzik Shmuli (Zionist Union), Omer Barlev (Zionist Union), Yehiel Hilik Bar (Zionist Union), Amir Peretz (Zionist Union), Merav Michaeli (Zionist Union), Eitan Cabel (Zionist Union), Micky Rosenthal (Zionist Union), Revital Swid (Zionist Union), Yoel Hasson (Zionist Union), Zouheir Bahloul (Zionist Union), Eytan Broshi (Zionist Union), Michal Biran (Zionist Union), Nachman Shai (Zionist Union), Ksenia Svetlova (Zionist Union), Ayelet Nahmias-Verbin (Zionist Union), Yoseph Yonah (Zionist Union), Eyal Ben Reuven (Zionist Union), Yael Cohen Paran (Zionist Union), Saleh Saad (Zionist Union), Leah Fadida (Zionist Union), Ilan Gilon (Meretz), Esawi Frej (Meretz), Michal Rozin (Meretz), Tamar Zandberg (Meretz), Mossi Raz (Meretz)
Reservations, sections and other votes (1)
In order. Votes on reservations and individual sections are shown separately from the vote on the bill as a whole.
- 7 March 2018 · Second reading · קריאה שנייההצעת חוק הכניסה לישראל (תיקון מס' 30), התשע"ח-2018Bill on Entry into Israel (Amendment No. 30), 2018auto64 for · 18 againstVote on sections of the bill