Government bill · 25th Knesset · published as law 11 December 2024

חוק להסדרת הפיקוח על כלבים (תיקון מס' 6 – הוראת שעה – חרבות ברזל) (תיקון), התשפ"ה-2024Law for the Regulation of Supervision of Dogs (Amendment No. 6 – temporary provision – Operation Swords of Iron) (Amendment), 2024 · automatic translation · suggest a correction

Status: התקבלה בקריאה שלישית

Topics: Health*, Military and defense, Agriculture and food*, Emergency, war and COVID · * from the Knesset's official law classification · no asterisk — automatically from words in the title

Official summary of the law (Knesset)

The Law extends the validity of the temporary provision intended to address the phenomenon of stray dogs that entered the State's territory from the Gaza Strip due to the breach of the border fence and the Iron Swords War. According to the temporary provision, a municipal veterinarian is authorized to order the euthanasia of a dog caught within a range of up to 20 kilometers from the border fence surrounding the Gaza Strip, with respect to which the conditions specified in the temporary provision are met, four days from the date of its transfer to the pound ("authority's den" in the language of the Law), and not later than ten days from that date as set out in the original Law. The temporary provision was valid until 30 November 2024, and the Law extends its validity until 31 March 2025. In addition, the Law changes the date set in the Law for the Minister of Agriculture and Food Security to report to the Economic Affairs Committee on the implementation of the temporary provision, so that instead of a month after the end of the temporary provision period, the Minister shall report to the Committee on the implementation of the temporary provision no later than 31 December 2024, and at an additional date close to the end of the validity of the temporary provision, as extended, no later than 16 March 2025.

automatic translation · suggest a correction

Hebrew original

החוק מאריך את תוקפה של הוראת השעה שנועדה להתמודד עם תופעת הכלבים המשוטטים שנכנסו מרצועת עזה לשטחי המדינה בשל פריצת גדר המערכת ומלחמת חרבות ברזל. לפי הוראת השעה, וטרינר עירוני מוסמך להורות על המתת כלב שנתפס בטווח של עד 20 קילומטרים מגדר המערכת המקיפה את רצועת עזה, שמתקיימים לגביו תנאים כמפורט בהוראת השעה, ארבעה ימים ממועד העברתו למכלאה ("מאורת הרשות" בלשון החוק), ולא לאחר עשרה ימים מהמועד האמור כפי שקובע החוק המקורי. הוראת השעה עמדה בתוקפה עד ליום כ"ט בחשוון התשפ"ה (30 בנובמבר 2024), והחוק מאריך את תוקפה עד ליום ב' בניסן התשפ"ה (31 במרץ 2025.( בנוסף, החוק משנה את המועד הקבוע בחוק לדיווח שר החקלאות וביטחון המזון לוועדת הכלכלה על יישום הוראת השעה, כך שבמקום חודש לאחר תום תקופת הוראת השעה, ידווח השר לוועדה על יישום הוראת השעה לא יאוחר מיום ל' בכסלו התשפ"ה (31 בדצמבר 2024), וכן במועד נוסף הסמוך לתום תוקפה של הוראת השעה, כפי שהוארכה, וזאת לא יאוחר מיום ט"ז באדר התשפ"ה (16 במרץ 2025(

Readings

What was said in the plenum

The bill seeks to extend a temporary provision allowing the shortening of the waiting period before euthanizing stray, ownerless dogs that entered from the Gaza territories (and, under certain conditions, also from Lebanon) following the Iron Swords war, from ten days to four, due to concerns for public health and safety. The second and third reading discussion focused on whether there is a factual justification for continuing the mass euthanasia of dogs, on the Ministry of Agriculture's failure to transfer information and budgets, and on the existence of alternative humane solutions; a significant portion of the first-reading speeches also included issues not directly related to the law, such as the hostages, the situation in the north and south, and internal political matters.

automatic translation · suggest a correction

Hebrew original

הצעת החוק מבקשת להאריך הוראת שעה המאפשרת לקצר את משך ההמתנה להמתת כלבים משוטטים ללא בעלים שנכנסו משטחי עזה (ובתנאים מסוימים גם מלבנון) בעקבות מלחמת חרבות ברזל, מארבעה ימים במקום עשרה, בשל חשש לבריאות הציבור ולביטחונו. הדיון בקריאה השנייה והשלישית התמקד בשאלה האם יש הצדקה עובדתית להמשך ההמתה ההמונית של כלבים, בכשל משרד החקלאות בהעברת מידע ותקציבים, ובקיומם של פתרונות הומניים חלופיים; חלק ניכר מהנאומים בקריאה הראשונה כלל גם סוגיות שאינן קשורות ישירות לחוק, כגון החטופים, המצב בצפון ובדרום וענייני פוליטיקה פנימית.

Arguments for

  • There is a need to continue enabling rapid handling of dangerous stray dogs that entered from combat areas in order to protect public safety and health, including preventing the spread of diseases such as rabies.
  • The fighting in Gaza and in the north continues and there is still a risk of additional stray dogs infiltrating through breached system fences, and therefore the temporary provision should be extended until the end of a defined period.
  • The committee added to the law reporting and transparency requirements for the Ministry of Agriculture and conditions for allocating budgets and avoiding the scattering of poison bait, which balances the possible harm to animals.
  • The Torah and Jewish tradition attach great importance to preventing cruelty to animals, so a balance must be struck between protecting the welfare of the dogs and the need to protect public peace, and the bill should be supported as formulated.

Arguments against

  • The Ministry of Agriculture did not present solid data proving the scope of the phenomenon or the need to continue the killing, and it is unclear how one can distinguish between dogs that arrived from Gaza and local dogs.
  • There are more humane and effective solutions, based on international experience (such as spaying, neutering and vaccination instead of killing), and the Ministry of Agriculture has refused to advance them for years.
    Yasmin Fridman (Yesh Atid)
  • There is no proof of the existence of rabies or any real health risk from the dogs that arrived from Gaza, so the health justification for euthanasia is unfounded.
    Yasmin Fridman (Yesh Atid)
  • The allocated budgets (such as 8 million shekels) are actually used to pay authorities for every dog that is killed, rather than for rehabilitation, adoption or genuine care for the animals, and it would be preferable to transfer the money to organizations operating in the field.
    Yasmin Fridman (Yesh Atid)
  • This is a repeated extension of an extreme measure that did not solve the problem from the outset and will not prevent its recurrence, at a time when the state has been persistently failing in systemic handling of the stray dog problem even before the war.
    Yasmin Fridman (Yesh Atid)
Who spoke (43)
MemberFactionReadingsSpeechesIn the final vote
Simon MoshiashviliShas coalitionThird reading1for
Merav Ben AriYesh Atid oppositionFirst reading, Third reading2against
Yasmin FridmanYesh Atid oppositionFirst reading, Third reading2against
Vladimir BeliakYesh Atid oppositionThird reading1against
Avi DicterLikud coalitionFirst reading1no record
Matan KahanaNational Unity oppositionFirst reading1no record
Simon DavidsonYesh Atid oppositionFirst reading1against
Waleed TahaRa'am oppositionFirst reading1no record
Mickey LevyYesh Atid oppositionFirst reading1against
Oded ForerYisrael Beytenu oppositionFirst reading1no record
Yasir HujeiratRa'am oppositionFirst reading1no record
Idan RollYesh Atid oppositionFirst reading1no record
Hamad AmarYisrael Beytenu oppositionFirst reading1no record
Waleed AlhwashlaRa'am oppositionFirst reading1no record
Ron KatzYesh Atid oppositionFirst reading1no record
Youssef AtaunaHadash–Ta'al oppositionFirst reading1no record
Yulia MalinovskyYisrael Beytenu oppositionFirst reading1no record
Tatiana MazarskyYesh Atid oppositionFirst reading1against
Naor ShiriYesh Atid oppositionFirst reading1against
Matti Sarfatti HarcaviYesh Atid oppositionFirst reading1against
Meirav CohenYesh Atid oppositionFirst reading1against
Meir CohenYesh Atid oppositionFirst reading1against
Yaron LeviYesh Atid oppositionFirst reading1against
Tally GotlivLikud coalitionFirst reading1no record
Yoav SegalovitzYesh Atid oppositionFirst reading1no record
Avi MaozNoam coalitionFirst reading1no record
Shelly Tal MeronYesh Atid oppositionFirst reading1against
Boaz ToporovskyYesh Atid oppositionFirst reading1no record
Tsega MelakuLikud coalitionFirst reading1for
Mansour AbbasRa'am oppositionFirst reading1no record
Debbie BitonYesh Atid oppositionFirst reading1no record
Osher ShkalimLikud coalitionFirst reading1for
Ahmad TibiHadash–Ta'al oppositionFirst reading1no record
Michal Shir SegmanYesh Atid oppositionFirst reading1no record
Iman Khatib YassinRa'am oppositionFirst reading1no record
Alon SchusterNational Unity oppositionFirst reading1no record
Limor Sonn Har MelechOtzma Yehudit coalitionFirst reading1for
Moshe TurpazYesh Atid oppositionFirst reading1against
Pnina TamenoNational Unity oppositionFirst reading1no record
Ram Ben BarakYesh Atid oppositionFirst reading1no record
Elazar SternYesh Atid oppositionFirst reading1no record
Amit HaleviLikud coalitionFirst reading1for
Moshe AbutbulShas coalitionFirst reading1no record

An automatic summary of the plenum transcripts: the debate on the bill at every reading it was voted on. Arguments are given as the speakers made them; this is not an assessment. The list of speakers comes from the transcript, without a model. Transcripts of the sittings: 1, 2

Reservations to the second reading

10 reservations were filed: proposed changes to the text the committee brought to the second and third reading.

The reservations filed to Section 1 sought to postpone the start date of the temporary provision and to change the conditions authorizing the ministry to euthanize dangerous dogs, including setting distances, time periods, a mandatory adoption check, prevention of suffering, a right of appeal, and expanding consultation with additional parties; no reservations were filed to Sections 2 and 3.

automatic translation · suggest a correction

Hebrew original

ההסתייגויות שהוגשו לסעיף 1 ביקשו לדחות את מועד תחילת הוראת השעה ולשנות את תנאי הסמכת המשרד להמתת כלבים מסוכנים, לרבות קביעת מרחקים, משכי זמן, חובת בדיקת אימוץ, מניעת סבל, זכות ערעור והרחבת היוועצות עם גורמים נוספים; לסעיפים 2 ו-3 לא הוגשו הסתייגויות.

By faction

  • Yesh Atid opposition · 10 reservations · 24 members

A joint reservation counts for every faction whose members filed it.

Who proposed what

Asked to speak: Benjamin Gantz (National Unity), Gadi Eisenkot (National Unity), Pnina Tameno (National Unity), Chili Tropper (National Unity), Michael Mordechai Biton (National Unity), Matan Kahana (National Unity), Orit Farkash Hacohen (National Unity), Alon Schuster (National Unity)

Proposers and reservation numbers are extracted automatically from the committee version, and the count is checked against the numbers printed in it. The descriptions are an automatic summary. Committee version for the second and third reading (PDF)

Reservations, sections and other votes (1)

In order. Votes on reservations and individual sections are shown separately from the vote on the bill as a whole.

Source: bill page in the Knesset legislation database ↗

Law for the Regulation of Supervision of Dogs (Amendment No. 6 – temporary provision – Operation Swords of Iron) (Amendment), 2024 · How the Knesset Votes