Private member's bill · 25th Knesset · published as law 20 November 2024
חוק הביטוח הלאומי (תיקון מס' 251), התשפ"ה–2024Law National Insurance (Amendment No. 251), 2024 · automatic translation · suggest a correction
Status: התקבלה בקריאה שלישית
Topics: Welfare and social security*, Health* · * from the Knesset's official law classification
Official summary of the law (Knesset)
It was established that during the period in which a child convicted of a security offense under Section 326(c) of the National Insurance Law, namely a severe terrorism offense under the Counter-Terrorism Law, is imprisoned due to his conviction, his parents will not be paid benefits under Chapter C of the National Insurance Law, including child allowance and a study grant, as well as dependent supplements for the child – regarding work injury victims' allowance, disability allowance, senior citizen allowance and survivors' allowance, and supplements for the child for income support benefit or payment under the Alimony (Guarantee of Payment) Law. In addition, during the imprisonment period, the child will not be counted among the parent's children for the purpose of calculating such benefits. The provisions of this Law will apply to a person who is imprisoned on or after the date this Law comes into effect.
automatic translation · suggest a correction
Hebrew original
נקבע, כי בתקופה שבה ילד שהורשע בעבירת ביטחון לפי סעיף 326(ג) לחוק הביטוח הלאומי, דהיינו בעבירת טרור חמורה לפי חוק המאבק בטרור, נמצא במאסר בשל הרשעתו, לא ישולמו להוריו גמלאות לפי פרק ג' לחוק הביטוח הלאומי, ובכלל זה קצבת ילדים ומענק לימודים וכן תוספות תלויים בעבור הילד – לעניין קצבת נפגעי עבודה, קצבת נכות, קצבת אזרח ותיק וקצבת שארים ותוספות בעד הילד לגמלת הבטחת הכנסה או לתשלום לפי חוק המזונות (הבטחת תשלום). כמו כן, בתקופת המאסר הילד לא יבוא במניין ילדיו של ההורה לצורך חישוב גמלאות כאמור. הוראות חוק זה יחולו לגבי מי שנמצא במאסר ביום תחילתו של חוק זה או לאחריו.
Sponsors
Readings
- 31 January 2024 · Preliminary readingהצעת חוק הביטוח הלאומי (תיקון - שלילת קצבאות בעד ילד הנמצא במאסר בשל עבירת טרור), התשפ"ד-2024Bill on National Insurance (Amendment - Denial of Child Allowances for a Child in Imprisonment for a Terrorist Offense), 2024autoBill passed preliminary reading28 for · 7 against
- 23 July 2024 · First readingהצעת חוק הביטוח הלאומי (תיקון מס' 249) (שלילת קצבאות בעד ילד הנמצא במאסר בשל עבירת טרור), התשפ"ד–2024Bill National Insurance (Amendment No. 249) (Denial of Allowances for a Child in Detention for a Terrorist Offense), 2024autoBill passed first reading23 for · 5 against
- 19 November 2024 · Third readingהצעת חוק הביטוח הלאומי (תיקון מס' 251), התשפ"ה–2024Bill National Insurance (Amendment No. 251), 2024autoLaw passed29 for · 8 against
What was said in the plenum
The bill stipulates that during the imprisonment of a minor convicted of a severe terrorism offense, child allowance and benefit supplements will not be paid to his parents for him, as an attempt to reinstate an arrangement legislated in 2015 and struck down by the Supreme Court in 2021 by a majority of five to four on the grounds of a violation of equality; the House discussion focused mainly on the question of whether there is a substantive difference between criminal offenses and nationalist terrorism that justifies discrimination in National Insurance payments, and on criticism of the Supreme Court's intervention in such laws, alongside reservations that distinguishing between types of offenders violates equality and that the bill is one-sided and ignores Jewish terrorism.
automatic translation · suggest a correction
Hebrew original
הצעת החוק קובעת כי בתקופת מאסרו של קטין שהורשע בעבירת טרור חמורה לא ישולמו להוריו קצבת ילדים ותוספות גמלה בעבורו, וזאת כניסיון לחזור על הסדר שחוקק ב-2015 ונפסל בבג״ץ ב-2021 ברוב קולות של חמישה נגד ארבעה בטענת פגיעה בשוויון; הדיון בבית נסב בעיקר על השאלה אם יש הבדל מהותי בין פשיעה פלילית לטרור לאומני המצדיק הפליה בתשלומי הביטוח הלאומי, ועל הביקורת על התערבות בג״ץ בחוקים כאלה, לצד הסתייגות שהבחנה בין סוגי העבריינים פוגעת בשוויון ושההצעה חד-צדדית ומתעלמת מטרור יהודי.
Arguments for
- There is no justification for paying National Insurance benefits from public funds to the families of minors convicted of terrorism who seek to destroy the State of Israel and its citizens.Ariel Kallner (Likud), Nir Barkat (Likud)
- There is a substantial difference between criminal offenses, which are motivated by personal interest and amenable to rehabilitation, and nationalist terrorism, which enjoys social and family support and is not amenable to rehabilitation, and therefore there is no justification for equating them in terms of eligibility for benefits.Ariel Kallner (Likud)
- The Supreme Court ruling from 2021 that struck down a similar law was mistaken, especially after 7 October, which exposed the depth of the nationalist threat, and the Knesset should re-legislate the arrangement despite the expected annulment.Ariel Kallner (Likud)
- The law places responsibility on parents for educating their children and reflects the duty of mutual responsibility of Israel's citizens vis-à-vis the enemy.Ariel Kallner (Likud)
- The bill is formulated so as to withstand the test of constitutionality and address the flaws pointed out by the Supreme Court, thereby allowing it to stand as an effective and proportionate law.Etty Hava Atia (Likud), Yulia Malinovsky (Yisrael Beytenu)
Arguments against
- The bill discriminates between types of offenders and harms the principle of equality, as determined by the Supreme Court, by denying a benefit to the family of a minor convicted of one offense but not of others.Etty Hava Atia (Likud)
- The bill treats terrorism as if it exists only on the Palestinian side and ignores acts of terrorism and sabotage committed by settlers and hilltop youth, thereby reflecting a double standard.Youssef Atauna (Hadash–Ta'al)
Who spoke (19)
| Member | Faction | Readings | Speeches | In the final vote |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ariel Kallner | Likud coalition | Preliminary reading, First reading, Third reading | 4 | for |
| Nir Barkat | Likud coalition | Preliminary reading | 1 | no record |
| Youssef Atauna | Hadash–Ta'al opposition | First reading | 1 | against |
| Waleed Alhwashla | Ra'am opposition | First reading | 1 | against |
| Oded Forer | Yisrael Beytenu opposition | First reading | 1 | no record |
| Etty Hava Atia | Likud coalition | Third reading | 2 | for |
| Mickey Levy | Yesh Atid opposition | Third reading | 2 | present, did not vote |
| Yoav Segalovitz | Yesh Atid opposition | Third reading | 1 | present, did not vote |
| Yorai Lahav Hertzanu | Yesh Atid opposition | Third reading | 1 | against |
| Matti Sarfatti Harcavi | Yesh Atid opposition | Third reading | 1 | no record |
| Tatiana Mazarsky | Yesh Atid opposition | Third reading | 1 | against |
| Yasmin Fridman | Yesh Atid opposition | Third reading | 1 | no record |
| Moshe Turpaz | Yesh Atid opposition | Third reading | 1 | no record |
| Naor Shiri | Yesh Atid opposition | Third reading | 1 | present, did not vote |
| Shelly Tal Meron | Yesh Atid opposition | Third reading | 1 | no record |
| Gilad Kariv | Labor opposition | Third reading | 2 | no record |
| Ayman Odeh | Hadash–Ta'al opposition | Third reading | 1 | against |
| Aida Touma Sliman | Hadash–Ta'al opposition | Third reading | 1 | against |
| Yulia Malinovsky | Yisrael Beytenu opposition | Third reading | 1 | for |
An automatic summary of the plenum transcripts: the debate on the bill at every reading it was voted on. Arguments are given as the speakers made them; this is not an assessment. The list of speakers comes from the transcript, without a model. Transcripts of the sittings: 1, 2, 3 · write to the author
Reservations to the second reading
1 reservation was filed: proposed changes to the text the committee brought to the second and third reading.
The only reservation filed to Section 1 sought to require the National Insurance Institute to report to the Labor and Welfare Committee, once a month (or alternatively once every three months), on the amounts of benefits that were not paid in the period preceding the report.
automatic translation · suggest a correction
Hebrew original
ההסתייגות היחידה שהוגשה לסעיף 1 ביקשה לחייב את המוסד לביטוח לאומי לדווח לוועדת העבודה והרווחה, אחת לחודש (ולחלופין אחת לשלושה חודשים), על סכומי הגמלאות שלא שולמו בתקופה שקדמה לדיווח.
By faction
- National Unity opposition · 1 reservation · 8 members
- Labor opposition · 1 reservation · 4 members
- Yesh Atid opposition · 1 reservation · 24 members
A joint reservation counts for every faction whose members filed it.
Who proposed what
- יש עתיד · 1The Yesh Atid group proposed, together with additional groups, to require the National Insurance Institute to report to the Labor and Welfare Committee once a month on the amounts of benefits that were not paid.Sections: לסעיף 1Yair Lapid, Meir Cohen, Karine Elharrar, Meirav Cohen, Elazar Stern, Mickey Levy, Merav Ben Ari, Ram Ben Barak, Yoav Segalovitz, Boaz Toporovsky, Michal Shir Segman, Idan Roll, Yorai Lahav Hertzanu, Vladimir Beliak, Ron Katz, Matti Sarfatti Harcavi, Tatiana Mazarsky, Yasmin Fridman, Debbie Biton, Moshe Turpaz, Simon Davidson, Naor Shiri, Shelly Tal Meron, Yaron Levi
- המחנה הממלכתי · 1The State Camp group proposed, together with additional groups, to require the National Insurance Institute to report to the Labor and Welfare Committee once a month on the amounts of benefits that were not paid.Sections: לסעיף 1
- העבודה · 1The Labor group proposed, together with additional groups, to require the National Insurance Institute to report to the Labor and Welfare Committee once a month on the amounts of benefits that were not paid.Sections: לסעיף 1
Asked to speak: Ariel Kallner (Likud), Simcha Rothman (Religious Zionism), Ayman Odeh (Hadash–Ta'al), Ahmad Tibi (Hadash–Ta'al), Aida Touma Sliman (Hadash–Ta'al), Ofer Cassif (Hadash–Ta'al), Youssef Atauna (Hadash–Ta'al)
Proposers and reservation numbers are extracted automatically from the committee version, and the count is checked against the numbers printed in it. The descriptions are an automatic summary. Committee version for the second and third reading (PDF) · write to the author
Reservations, sections and other votes (3)
In order. Votes on reservations and individual sections are shown separately from the vote on the bill as a whole.
- 19 November 2024 · Second reading · הסתייגות 1הצעת חוק הביטוח הלאומי (תיקון מס' 251), התשפ"ה–2024Bill National Insurance (Amendment No. 251), 2024auto8 for · 27 againstVote on a reservation (amendment)
- 19 November 2024 · Second reading · הסתייגות 1 לחלופיןהצעת חוק הביטוח הלאומי (תיקון מס' 251), התשפ"ה–2024Bill National Insurance (Amendment No. 251), 2024auto8 for · 26 againstVote on a reservation (amendment)
- 19 November 2024 · Second readingהצעת חוק הביטוח הלאומי (תיקון מס' 251), התשפ"ה–2024Bill National Insurance (Amendment No. 251), 2024auto29 for · 6 againstVote on sections of the bill