Private member's bill · 25th Knesset · published as law 20 November 2024

חוק הביטוח הלאומי (תיקון מס' 251), התשפ"ה–2024Law National Insurance (Amendment No. 251), 2024 · automatic translation · suggest a correction

Status: התקבלה בקריאה שלישית

Topics: Welfare and social security*, Health* · * from the Knesset's official law classification

Official summary of the law (Knesset)

It was established that during the period in which a child convicted of a security offense under Section 326(c) of the National Insurance Law, namely a severe terrorism offense under the Counter-Terrorism Law, is imprisoned due to his conviction, his parents will not be paid benefits under Chapter C of the National Insurance Law, including child allowance and a study grant, as well as dependent supplements for the child – regarding work injury victims' allowance, disability allowance, senior citizen allowance and survivors' allowance, and supplements for the child for income support benefit or payment under the Alimony (Guarantee of Payment) Law. In addition, during the imprisonment period, the child will not be counted among the parent's children for the purpose of calculating such benefits. The provisions of this Law will apply to a person who is imprisoned on or after the date this Law comes into effect.

automatic translation · suggest a correction

Hebrew original

נקבע, כי בתקופה שבה ילד שהורשע בעבירת ביטחון לפי סעיף 326(ג) לחוק הביטוח הלאומי, דהיינו בעבירת טרור חמורה לפי חוק המאבק בטרור, נמצא במאסר בשל הרשעתו, לא ישולמו להוריו גמלאות לפי פרק ג' לחוק הביטוח הלאומי, ובכלל זה קצבת ילדים ומענק לימודים וכן תוספות תלויים בעבור הילד – לעניין קצבת נפגעי עבודה, קצבת נכות, קצבת אזרח ותיק וקצבת שארים ותוספות בעד הילד לגמלת הבטחת הכנסה או לתשלום לפי חוק המזונות (הבטחת תשלום). כמו כן, בתקופת המאסר הילד לא יבוא במניין ילדיו של ההורה לצורך חישוב גמלאות כאמור. הוראות חוק זה יחולו לגבי מי שנמצא במאסר ביום תחילתו של חוק זה או לאחריו.

Sponsors

Ariel Kallner

Readings

What was said in the plenum

The bill stipulates that during the imprisonment of a minor convicted of a severe terrorism offense, child allowance and benefit supplements will not be paid to his parents for him, as an attempt to reinstate an arrangement legislated in 2015 and struck down by the Supreme Court in 2021 by a majority of five to four on the grounds of a violation of equality; the House discussion focused mainly on the question of whether there is a substantive difference between criminal offenses and nationalist terrorism that justifies discrimination in National Insurance payments, and on criticism of the Supreme Court's intervention in such laws, alongside reservations that distinguishing between types of offenders violates equality and that the bill is one-sided and ignores Jewish terrorism.

automatic translation · suggest a correction

Hebrew original

הצעת החוק קובעת כי בתקופת מאסרו של קטין שהורשע בעבירת טרור חמורה לא ישולמו להוריו קצבת ילדים ותוספות גמלה בעבורו, וזאת כניסיון לחזור על הסדר שחוקק ב-2015 ונפסל בבג״ץ ב-2021 ברוב קולות של חמישה נגד ארבעה בטענת פגיעה בשוויון; הדיון בבית נסב בעיקר על השאלה אם יש הבדל מהותי בין פשיעה פלילית לטרור לאומני המצדיק הפליה בתשלומי הביטוח הלאומי, ועל הביקורת על התערבות בג״ץ בחוקים כאלה, לצד הסתייגות שהבחנה בין סוגי העבריינים פוגעת בשוויון ושההצעה חד-צדדית ומתעלמת מטרור יהודי.

Arguments for

  • There is no justification for paying National Insurance benefits from public funds to the families of minors convicted of terrorism who seek to destroy the State of Israel and its citizens.
    Ariel Kallner (Likud), Nir Barkat (Likud)
  • There is a substantial difference between criminal offenses, which are motivated by personal interest and amenable to rehabilitation, and nationalist terrorism, which enjoys social and family support and is not amenable to rehabilitation, and therefore there is no justification for equating them in terms of eligibility for benefits.
  • The Supreme Court ruling from 2021 that struck down a similar law was mistaken, especially after 7 October, which exposed the depth of the nationalist threat, and the Knesset should re-legislate the arrangement despite the expected annulment.
  • The law places responsibility on parents for educating their children and reflects the duty of mutual responsibility of Israel's citizens vis-à-vis the enemy.
  • The bill is formulated so as to withstand the test of constitutionality and address the flaws pointed out by the Supreme Court, thereby allowing it to stand as an effective and proportionate law.
    Etty Hava Atia (Likud), Yulia Malinovsky (Yisrael Beytenu)

Arguments against

  • The bill discriminates between types of offenders and harms the principle of equality, as determined by the Supreme Court, by denying a benefit to the family of a minor convicted of one offense but not of others.
  • The bill treats terrorism as if it exists only on the Palestinian side and ignores acts of terrorism and sabotage committed by settlers and hilltop youth, thereby reflecting a double standard.
    Youssef Atauna (Hadash–Ta'al)
Who spoke (19)
MemberFactionReadingsSpeechesIn the final vote
Ariel KallnerLikud coalitionPreliminary reading, First reading, Third reading4for
Nir BarkatLikud coalitionPreliminary reading1no record
Youssef AtaunaHadash–Ta'al oppositionFirst reading1against
Waleed AlhwashlaRa'am oppositionFirst reading1against
Oded ForerYisrael Beytenu oppositionFirst reading1no record
Etty Hava AtiaLikud coalitionThird reading2for
Mickey LevyYesh Atid oppositionThird reading2present, did not vote
Yoav SegalovitzYesh Atid oppositionThird reading1present, did not vote
Yorai Lahav HertzanuYesh Atid oppositionThird reading1against
Matti Sarfatti HarcaviYesh Atid oppositionThird reading1no record
Tatiana MazarskyYesh Atid oppositionThird reading1against
Yasmin FridmanYesh Atid oppositionThird reading1no record
Moshe TurpazYesh Atid oppositionThird reading1no record
Naor ShiriYesh Atid oppositionThird reading1present, did not vote
Shelly Tal MeronYesh Atid oppositionThird reading1no record
Gilad KarivLabor oppositionThird reading2no record
Ayman OdehHadash–Ta'al oppositionThird reading1against
Aida Touma SlimanHadash–Ta'al oppositionThird reading1against
Yulia MalinovskyYisrael Beytenu oppositionThird reading1for

An automatic summary of the plenum transcripts: the debate on the bill at every reading it was voted on. Arguments are given as the speakers made them; this is not an assessment. The list of speakers comes from the transcript, without a model. Transcripts of the sittings: 1, 2, 3 · write to the author

Reservations to the second reading

1 reservation was filed: proposed changes to the text the committee brought to the second and third reading.

The only reservation filed to Section 1 sought to require the National Insurance Institute to report to the Labor and Welfare Committee, once a month (or alternatively once every three months), on the amounts of benefits that were not paid in the period preceding the report.

automatic translation · suggest a correction

Hebrew original

ההסתייגות היחידה שהוגשה לסעיף 1 ביקשה לחייב את המוסד לביטוח לאומי לדווח לוועדת העבודה והרווחה, אחת לחודש (ולחלופין אחת לשלושה חודשים), על סכומי הגמלאות שלא שולמו בתקופה שקדמה לדיווח.

By faction

  • National Unity opposition · 1 reservation · 8 members
  • Labor opposition · 1 reservation · 4 members
  • Yesh Atid opposition · 1 reservation · 24 members

A joint reservation counts for every faction whose members filed it.

Who proposed what

Asked to speak: Ariel Kallner (Likud), Simcha Rothman (Religious Zionism), Ayman Odeh (Hadash–Ta'al), Ahmad Tibi (Hadash–Ta'al), Aida Touma Sliman (Hadash–Ta'al), Ofer Cassif (Hadash–Ta'al), Youssef Atauna (Hadash–Ta'al)

Proposers and reservation numbers are extracted automatically from the committee version, and the count is checked against the numbers printed in it. The descriptions are an automatic summary. Committee version for the second and third reading (PDF) · write to the author

Reservations, sections and other votes (3)

In order. Votes on reservations and individual sections are shown separately from the vote on the bill as a whole.

Source: bill page in the Knesset legislation database ↗

Law National Insurance (Amendment No. 251), 2024 · How the Knesset Votes