Private member's bill · 20th Knesset · published as law 13 February 2017

חוק להסדרת ההתיישבות ביהודה והשומרון, התשע"ז-2017Law for the Regulation of Settlement in Judea and Samaria, 2017 · automatic translation · suggest a correction

Status: התקבלה בקריאה שלישית

Topics: Housing, land and construction* · * from the Knesset's official law classification

Official summary of the law (Knesset)

The Law to Regulate Settlement in Judea and Samaria, 2017, is intended to regulate Israeli settlements in Judea and Samaria that were built or expanded without an orderly planning process on land whose use rights are not held by state authorities, where this was done in good faith or with the consent of state authorities. Under the law, if a person has not proven ownership of the land, it will be registered in the name of the Custodian of Government Property in the Judea and Samaria Area, and if a person has proven ownership of the land, the use rights will be expropriated and transferred to the Custodian, and that person will be entitled to usage fees for the land or to alternative land. In addition, the law provides that a holder of rights in the land who considers himself harmed by the expropriation may file an objection with an objections committee, and that the expropriation will remain in effect until a political decision is made regarding the status of the area and the Israeli settlement therein. It is also provided that until the completion of the planning procedures, enforcement proceedings and orders issued in connection with structures in these settlements will be suspended, and they will expire upon completion of the planning procedures, except where a judicial decision or judgment has been given regarding the implementation of those orders.

automatic translation · suggest a correction

Hebrew original

החוק להסדרת ההתיישבות ביהודה ושומרון, התשע"ז-2017, נועד להסדיר ישובים ישראלים ביהודה והשומרון שנבנו או הורחבו ללא הליך תכנון מסודר על קרקע שזכויות השימוש בה אינן נתונות בידי רשויות המדינה, כאשר הדבר נעשה בתום לב או בהסכמת רשויות המדינה. לפי החוק, אם לא הוכיח אדם את בעלותו על הקרקע, היא תירשם על שם הממונה על הרכוש הממשלתי באזור יהודה והשומרון, ואם הוכיח אדם את בעלותו על הקרקע, יופקעו זכויות השימוש ויועברו לממונה, ואותו אדם יהיה זכאי לדמי שימוש במקרקעין או לקרקע חלופית. בנוסף, החוק קובע כי בעל זכויות במקרקעין הרואה עצמו נפגע מההפקעה, רשאי להגיש השגה לוועדת השגות, וכי ההפקעה תעמוד בתוקפה עד להכרעה מדינית בדבר מעמדו של האזור וההתיישבות הישראלית בו. כמו כן, נקבע כי עד להשלמת הליכי התכנון יותלו הליכי האכיפה והצווים שניתנו בקשר למבנים ביישובים אלה, והם יפקעו עם השלמת הליכי התכנון, והכל למעט אם ניתנה החלטה שיפוטית או פסק דין בדבר מימוש אותם הצווים.

Sponsors

Bezalel Smotrich, Yoav Kisch, Shuli Moalem-Refaeli, David Bitan, Oren Asaf Hazan

Readings

What was said in the plenum

The law is intended to retroactively regularize Israeli construction in Judea and Samaria that was built in good faith on land later found to be partly privately owned, establishing a compensation mechanism for landowners and preventing the eviction of homes as a result of legal petitions. The debate focused on whether the law is a moral and necessary act to protect settlers and realize Israeli sovereignty, or an act of unlawful seizure and annexation that contravenes international law, the position of the Attorney General, and the principle of separation of powers, and that would endanger Israel in the international arena and before the Supreme Court.

automatic translation · suggest a correction

Hebrew original

החוק נועד להסדיר רטרואקטיבית בנייה ישראלית ביהודה ושומרון שנבנתה בתום לב על קרקעות שהתברר כי חלקן פרטיות, תוך קביעת מנגנון פיצוי לבעלי הקרקע ומניעת פינוי בתים כתוצאה מעתירות משפטיות. הדיון התמקד בשאלה אם החוק הוא מעשה מוסרי והכרחי להגנת מתיישבים ולמימוש ריבונות ישראלית, או מעשה גזל וסיפוח בלתי חוקי המנוגד לדין הבין-לאומי, לעמדת היועץ המשפטי לממשלה ולעקרון הפרדת הרשויות, שיסכן את ישראל בזירה הבין-לאומית ובבג״ץ.

Arguments for

Arguments against

None were made.

Who spoke (58)
MemberFactionReadingsSpeechesIn the final vote
Bezalel SmotrichJewish Home coalitionFirst reading, Third reading22for
שרת המשפטים איילת שקד—First reading11—
Isaac HerzogZionist Union oppositionFirst reading, Third reading3against
Shuli Moalem-RefaeliJewish Home coalitionFirst reading, Third reading15for
Ze'ev Binyamin BeginLikud coalitionFirst reading1against
Tzipi HotovelyLikud coalitionFirst reading6for
Yair LapidYesh Atid oppositionFirst reading2against
Tamar ZandbergMeretz oppositionFirst reading2against
Masud GanaimJoint List oppositionFirst reading1against
Yael GermanYesh Atid oppositionFirst reading3against
Ilan GilonMeretz oppositionFirst reading, Third reading3against
Dov KheninJoint List oppositionFirst reading, Third reading3against
Basel GhattasJoint List oppositionFirst reading1no record
Esawi FrejMeretz oppositionFirst reading1against
Karine ElharrarYesh Atid oppositionFirst reading1against
Ayman OdehJoint List oppositionFirst reading2against
Talab Abu ArarJoint List oppositionFirst reading1against
Elazar SternYesh Atid oppositionFirst reading3against
Amir OhanaLikud coalitionFirst reading2for
Ahmad TibiJoint List oppositionFirst reading2no record
Haim JelinYesh Atid oppositionFirst reading3against
Osama SaadiJoint List oppositionFirst reading2against
Michal BiranZionist Union oppositionFirst reading1against
Amir PeretzZionist Union oppositionFirst reading3against
Meir CohenYesh Atid oppositionFirst reading1no record
Yousef JabareenJoint List oppositionFirst reading1against
Omer BarlevZionist Union oppositionFirst reading1against
Akram HassonKulanu coalitionFirst reading2no record
Zouheir BahloulZionist Union oppositionFirst reading2against
Menachem Eliezer MosesUnited Torah Judaism coalitionFirst reading1for
Ofer ShelahYesh Atid oppositionFirst reading1against
Yael Cohen ParanZionist Union oppositionFirst reading2against
Orly Levi-AbekasisYisrael Beytenu coalitionFirst reading4against
Eyal Ben ReuvenZionist Union oppositionFirst reading1against
Merav MichaeliZionist Union oppositionFirst reading, Third reading2against
Manuel TrajtenbergZionist Union oppositionFirst reading1against
Abdullah Abu MaarufJoint List oppositionFirst reading2against
Jamal ZahalkaJoint List oppositionFirst reading2against
Abd Al Hakeem Haj YahyaJoint List oppositionFirst reading2against
Aliza LavieYesh Atid oppositionFirst reading2against
Ayelet Nahmias-VerbinZionist Union oppositionFirst reading5against
Ksenia SvetlovaZionist Union oppositionFirst reading1against
Revital SwidZionist Union oppositionFirst reading, Third reading6against
Yehuda Joshua GlickLikud coalitionFirst reading1for
Nachman ShaiZionist Union oppositionFirst reading1against
Aida Touma SlimanJoint List oppositionFirst reading1against
Hanin ZoabiJoint List oppositionFirst reading3against
Yehiel Hilik BarZionist Union oppositionFirst reading4against
Eytan BroshiZionist Union oppositionFirst reading1against
Yoel HassonZionist Union oppositionFirst reading4against
Oren Asaf HazanLikud coalitionFirst reading3for
Tzipi LivniZionist Union oppositionFirst reading3against
Yoav KischLikud coalitionFirst reading, Third reading12for
Naftali BennettJewish Home coalitionFirst reading5for
Israel EichlerUnited Torah Judaism coalitionThird reading2for
Ofir AkunisLikud coalitionThird reading28for
Zeev ElkinLikud coalitionThird reading19for
Nissan SlomianskyJewish Home coalitionThird reading5for

An automatic summary of the plenum transcripts: the debate on the bill at every reading it was voted on. Arguments are given as the speakers made them; this is not an assessment. The list of speakers comes from the transcript, without a model. A very long debate: every speech was shortened to the same length before summarising. Transcripts of the sittings: 1, 2, 3

Reservations to the second reading

227 reservations were filed: proposed changes to the text the committee brought to the second and third reading.

The reservations submitted by opposition factions sought to delete or substantially change the main provisions of the law, including its name, definitions, and regularization mechanisms, on the grounds that it facilitates the taking of private Palestinian land; in contrast, a few reservations by Knesset Member Smotrich sought to expand the possibilities for regularization and legalization.

automatic translation · suggest a correction

Hebrew original

ההסתייגויות שהוגשו על ידי סיעות האופוזיציה ביקשו למחוק או לשנות מהותית את עיקרי החוק, לרבות שמו, הגדרותיו ומנגנוני ההסדרה שבו, מתוך טענה שהוא מכשיר נטילת קרקעות פרטיות פלסטיניות; לעומת זאת הסתייגויות בודדות של חבר הכנסת סמוטריץ' ביקשו להרחיב את אפשרויות ההסדרה וההכשרה.'

By faction

  • Zionist Union opposition · 224 reservations · 24 members
  • Joint List opposition · 224 reservations · 13 members
  • Meretz opposition · 224 reservations · 5 members
  • Yesh Atid opposition · 139 reservations · 11 members
  • Jewish Home coalition · 3 reservations · 1 member

A joint reservation counts for every faction whose members filed it.

Who proposed what

Asked to speak: Israel Eichler (United Torah Judaism), Orly Levi-Abekasis (Yisrael Beytenu), Shuli Moalem-Refaeli (Jewish Home)

Proposers and reservation numbers are extracted automatically from the committee version, and the count is checked against the numbers printed in it. The descriptions are an automatic summary. Committee version for the second and third reading (PDF)

Reservations, sections and other votes (4)

In order. Votes on reservations and individual sections are shown separately from the vote on the bill as a whole.

Source: bill page in the Knesset legislation database ↗

Law for the Regulation of Settlement in Judea and Samaria, 2017 · How the Knesset Votes