Private member's bill · 20th Knesset · published as law 13 February 2017
חוק להסדרת ההתיישבות ביהודה והשומרון, התשע"ז-2017Law for the Regulation of Settlement in Judea and Samaria, 2017 · automatic translation · suggest a correction
Status: התקבלה בקריאה שלישית
Topics: Housing, land and construction* · * from the Knesset's official law classification
Official summary of the law (Knesset)
The Law to Regulate Settlement in Judea and Samaria, 2017, is intended to regulate Israeli settlements in Judea and Samaria that were built or expanded without an orderly planning process on land whose use rights are not held by state authorities, where this was done in good faith or with the consent of state authorities. Under the law, if a person has not proven ownership of the land, it will be registered in the name of the Custodian of Government Property in the Judea and Samaria Area, and if a person has proven ownership of the land, the use rights will be expropriated and transferred to the Custodian, and that person will be entitled to usage fees for the land or to alternative land. In addition, the law provides that a holder of rights in the land who considers himself harmed by the expropriation may file an objection with an objections committee, and that the expropriation will remain in effect until a political decision is made regarding the status of the area and the Israeli settlement therein. It is also provided that until the completion of the planning procedures, enforcement proceedings and orders issued in connection with structures in these settlements will be suspended, and they will expire upon completion of the planning procedures, except where a judicial decision or judgment has been given regarding the implementation of those orders.
automatic translation · suggest a correction
Hebrew original
החוק להסדרת ההתיישבות ביהודה ושומרון, התשע"ז-2017, נועד להסדיר ישובים ישראלים ביהודה והשומרון שנבנו או הורחבו ללא הליך תכנון מסודר על קרקע שזכויות השימוש בה אינן נתונות בידי רשויות המדינה, כאשר הדבר נעשה בתום לב או בהסכמת רשויות המדינה. לפי החוק, אם לא הוכיח אדם את בעלותו על הקרקע, היא תירשם על שם הממונה על הרכוש הממשלתי באזור יהודה והשומרון, ואם הוכיח אדם את בעלותו על הקרקע, יופקעו זכויות השימוש ויועברו לממונה, ואותו אדם יהיה זכאי לדמי שימוש במקרקעין או לקרקע חלופית. בנוסף, החוק קובע כי בעל זכויות במקרקעין הרואה עצמו נפגע מההפקעה, רשאי להגיש השגה לוועדת השגות, וכי ההפקעה תעמוד בתוקפה עד להכרעה מדינית בדבר מעמדו של האזור וההתיישבות הישראלית בו. כמו כן, נקבע כי עד להשלמת הליכי התכנון יותלו הליכי האכיפה והצווים שניתנו בקשר למבנים ביישובים אלה, והם יפקעו עם השלמת הליכי התכנון, והכל למעט אם ניתנה החלטה שיפוטית או פסק דין בדבר מימוש אותם הצווים.
Sponsors
Bezalel Smotrich, Yoav Kisch, Shuli Moalem-Refaeli, David Bitan, Oren Asaf Hazan
Readings
- 5 December 2016 · First reading · להעביר את הצעת החוק לוועדה שתקבע ועדת הכנסתהצעת חוק להסדרת ההתיישבות ביהודה והשומרון, התשע"ז-2016Bill for Regulation of Settlement in Judea and Samaria, 2016autoBill passed first reading60 for · 49 against
- 7 December 2016 · First reading · להעביר את הצעת החוק לוועדההצעת חוק להסדרת ההתיישבות ביהודה והשומרון, התשע"ז-2016Bill for Regulation of Settlement in Judea and Samaria, 2016autoBill passed first reading58 for · 51 against
- 6 February 2017 · Third readingחוק להסדרת ההתיישבות ביהודה והשומרון, התשע"ז-2017Law for the Regulation of Settlement in Judea and Samaria, 2017autoLaw passed60 for · 52 against
What was said in the plenum
The law is intended to retroactively regularize Israeli construction in Judea and Samaria that was built in good faith on land later found to be partly privately owned, establishing a compensation mechanism for landowners and preventing the eviction of homes as a result of legal petitions. The debate focused on whether the law is a moral and necessary act to protect settlers and realize Israeli sovereignty, or an act of unlawful seizure and annexation that contravenes international law, the position of the Attorney General, and the principle of separation of powers, and that would endanger Israel in the international arena and before the Supreme Court.
automatic translation · suggest a correction
Hebrew original
החוק נועד להסדיר רטרואקטיבית בנייה ישראלית ביהודה ושומרון שנבנתה בתום לב על קרקעות שהתברר כי חלקן פרטיות, תוך קביעת מנגנון פיצוי לבעלי הקרקע ומניעת פינוי בתים כתוצאה מעתירות משפטיות. הדיון התמקד בשאלה אם החוק הוא מעשה מוסרי והכרחי להגנת מתיישבים ולמימוש ריבונות ישראלית, או מעשה גזל וסיפוח בלתי חוקי המנוגד לדין הבין-לאומי, לעמדת היועץ המשפטי לממשלה ולעקרון הפרדת הרשויות, שיסכן את ישראל בזירה הבין-לאומית ובבג״ץ.
Arguments for
- Jewish settlement in Judea and Samaria has a historical and natural right, the area is not occupied territory but part of the Land of Israel, and Israeli sovereignty should be applied to it.Bezalel Smotrich (Jewish Home), Shuli Moalem-Refaeli (Jewish Home), Ze'ev Binyamin Begin (Likud), Tzipi Hotovely (Likud), Yoav Kisch (Likud), Naftali Bennett (Jewish Home), Ofir Akunis (Likud)
- The settlers built in good faith and with the state's encouragement, and therefore the state is responsible for regularizing their status rather than demolishing their homes, just as is done in similar cases within the Green Line.Shuli Moalem-Refaeli (Jewish Home), Tzipi Hotovely (Likud), Amir Ohana (Likud), Yoav Kisch (Likud), Zeev Elkin (Likud), Nissan Slomiansky (Jewish Home)
- The law provides fair compensation to Arab landowners, and is therefore a more just solution than demolishing the houses and leaving desolation in their place.Shuli Moalem-Refaeli (Jewish Home), Tzipi Hotovely (Likud), Amir Ohana (Likud), Yoav Kisch (Likud), Israel Eichler (United Torah Judaism), Zeev Elkin (Likud)
- The Supreme Court is exceeding its role and infringing on the Knesset's authority to determine national-Zionist policy, and the Knesset must reclaim for itself the right to decide on these matters.Bezalel Smotrich (Jewish Home), Yoav Kisch (Likud)
- The law does not contradict international law and is no different from similar cases (such as Cyprus), and it does not constitute any real harm to Israel's international standing.Bezalel Smotrich (Jewish Home), Yoav Kisch (Likud)
Arguments against
None were made.
Who spoke (58)
| Member | Faction | Readings | Speeches | In the final vote |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bezalel Smotrich | Jewish Home coalition | First reading, Third reading | 22 | for |
| שרת המשפטים איילת שקד | — | First reading | 11 | — |
| Isaac Herzog | Zionist Union opposition | First reading, Third reading | 3 | against |
| Shuli Moalem-Refaeli | Jewish Home coalition | First reading, Third reading | 15 | for |
| Ze'ev Binyamin Begin | Likud coalition | First reading | 1 | against |
| Tzipi Hotovely | Likud coalition | First reading | 6 | for |
| Yair Lapid | Yesh Atid opposition | First reading | 2 | against |
| Tamar Zandberg | Meretz opposition | First reading | 2 | against |
| Masud Ganaim | Joint List opposition | First reading | 1 | against |
| Yael German | Yesh Atid opposition | First reading | 3 | against |
| Ilan Gilon | Meretz opposition | First reading, Third reading | 3 | against |
| Dov Khenin | Joint List opposition | First reading, Third reading | 3 | against |
| Basel Ghattas | Joint List opposition | First reading | 1 | no record |
| Esawi Frej | Meretz opposition | First reading | 1 | against |
| Karine Elharrar | Yesh Atid opposition | First reading | 1 | against |
| Ayman Odeh | Joint List opposition | First reading | 2 | against |
| Talab Abu Arar | Joint List opposition | First reading | 1 | against |
| Elazar Stern | Yesh Atid opposition | First reading | 3 | against |
| Amir Ohana | Likud coalition | First reading | 2 | for |
| Ahmad Tibi | Joint List opposition | First reading | 2 | no record |
| Haim Jelin | Yesh Atid opposition | First reading | 3 | against |
| Osama Saadi | Joint List opposition | First reading | 2 | against |
| Michal Biran | Zionist Union opposition | First reading | 1 | against |
| Amir Peretz | Zionist Union opposition | First reading | 3 | against |
| Meir Cohen | Yesh Atid opposition | First reading | 1 | no record |
| Yousef Jabareen | Joint List opposition | First reading | 1 | against |
| Omer Barlev | Zionist Union opposition | First reading | 1 | against |
| Akram Hasson | Kulanu coalition | First reading | 2 | no record |
| Zouheir Bahloul | Zionist Union opposition | First reading | 2 | against |
| Menachem Eliezer Moses | United Torah Judaism coalition | First reading | 1 | for |
| Ofer Shelah | Yesh Atid opposition | First reading | 1 | against |
| Yael Cohen Paran | Zionist Union opposition | First reading | 2 | against |
| Orly Levi-Abekasis | Yisrael Beytenu coalition | First reading | 4 | against |
| Eyal Ben Reuven | Zionist Union opposition | First reading | 1 | against |
| Merav Michaeli | Zionist Union opposition | First reading, Third reading | 2 | against |
| Manuel Trajtenberg | Zionist Union opposition | First reading | 1 | against |
| Abdullah Abu Maaruf | Joint List opposition | First reading | 2 | against |
| Jamal Zahalka | Joint List opposition | First reading | 2 | against |
| Abd Al Hakeem Haj Yahya | Joint List opposition | First reading | 2 | against |
| Aliza Lavie | Yesh Atid opposition | First reading | 2 | against |
| Ayelet Nahmias-Verbin | Zionist Union opposition | First reading | 5 | against |
| Ksenia Svetlova | Zionist Union opposition | First reading | 1 | against |
| Revital Swid | Zionist Union opposition | First reading, Third reading | 6 | against |
| Yehuda Joshua Glick | Likud coalition | First reading | 1 | for |
| Nachman Shai | Zionist Union opposition | First reading | 1 | against |
| Aida Touma Sliman | Joint List opposition | First reading | 1 | against |
| Hanin Zoabi | Joint List opposition | First reading | 3 | against |
| Yehiel Hilik Bar | Zionist Union opposition | First reading | 4 | against |
| Eytan Broshi | Zionist Union opposition | First reading | 1 | against |
| Yoel Hasson | Zionist Union opposition | First reading | 4 | against |
| Oren Asaf Hazan | Likud coalition | First reading | 3 | for |
| Tzipi Livni | Zionist Union opposition | First reading | 3 | against |
| Yoav Kisch | Likud coalition | First reading, Third reading | 12 | for |
| Naftali Bennett | Jewish Home coalition | First reading | 5 | for |
| Israel Eichler | United Torah Judaism coalition | Third reading | 2 | for |
| Ofir Akunis | Likud coalition | Third reading | 28 | for |
| Zeev Elkin | Likud coalition | Third reading | 19 | for |
| Nissan Slomiansky | Jewish Home coalition | Third reading | 5 | for |
An automatic summary of the plenum transcripts: the debate on the bill at every reading it was voted on. Arguments are given as the speakers made them; this is not an assessment. The list of speakers comes from the transcript, without a model. A very long debate: every speech was shortened to the same length before summarising. Transcripts of the sittings: 1, 2, 3
Reservations to the second reading
227 reservations were filed: proposed changes to the text the committee brought to the second and third reading.
The reservations submitted by opposition factions sought to delete or substantially change the main provisions of the law, including its name, definitions, and regularization mechanisms, on the grounds that it facilitates the taking of private Palestinian land; in contrast, a few reservations by Knesset Member Smotrich sought to expand the possibilities for regularization and legalization.
automatic translation · suggest a correction
Hebrew original
ההסתייגויות שהוגשו על ידי סיעות האופוזיציה ביקשו למחוק או לשנות מהותית את עיקרי החוק, לרבות שמו, הגדרותיו ומנגנוני ההסדרה שבו, מתוך טענה שהוא מכשיר נטילת קרקעות פרטיות פלסטיניות; לעומת זאת הסתייגויות בודדות של חבר הכנסת סמוטריץ' ביקשו להרחיב את אפשרויות ההסדרה וההכשרה.'
By faction
- Zionist Union opposition · 224 reservations · 24 members
- Joint List opposition · 224 reservations · 13 members
- Meretz opposition · 224 reservations · 5 members
- Yesh Atid opposition · 139 reservations · 11 members
- Jewish Home coalition · 3 reservations · 1 member
A joint reservation counts for every faction whose members filed it.
Who proposed what
- קבוצת המחנה הציוני · 224The Zionist Camp group proposed many reservations rejecting the proposed regularization itself, seeking to present the law as legalizing the seizure of Palestinian land, to repeal sections, and to limit their implementation.Sections: לשם החוק, לסעיף 1, לסעיף 2, לסעיף 3, לאחרי סעיף 3, לסעיף 4, לסעיף 5, לסעיף 6, לסעיף 7, לסעיף 8, לסעיף 9, לסעיף 10, לאחרי סעיף 10, לסעיף 11, לאחרי סעיף 11, לתוספתIsaac Herzog, Tzipi Livni, Shelly Yachimovich, Stav Shaffir, Itzik Shmuli, Omer Barlev, Yehiel Hilik Bar, Amir Peretz, Merav Michaeli, Eitan Cabel, Manuel Trajtenberg, Erel Margalit, Micky Rosenthal, Revital Swid, Yoel Hasson, Zouheir Bahloul, Eytan Broshi, Michal Biran, Nachman Shai, Ksenia Svetlova, Ayelet Nahmias-Verbin, Yoseph Yonah, Eyal Ben Reuven, Yael Cohen Paran
- קבוצת מרצ · 224The Meretz group proposed many reservations seeking to repeal or substantially change the law's definitions and provisions so as to protect the property rights of residents of the territories and prevent the legalization of outposts established on private land.Sections: לשם החוק, לסעיף 1, לסעיף 2, לסעיף 3, לאחרי סעיף 3, לסעיף 4, לסעיף 5, לסעיף 6, לסעיף 7, לסעיף 8, לסעיף 9, לסעיף 10, לאחרי סעיף 10, לסעיף 11, לאחרי סעיף 11, לתוספת
- קבוצת הרשימה המשותפת · 224The Joint List group proposed reservations seeking to delete most of the law's sections and replace them with provisions returning land to its Palestinian owners and revoking recognition of Israeli settlement in the territories.Sections: לשם החוק, לסעיף 1, לסעיף 2, לסעיף 3, לאחרי סעיף 3, לסעיף 4, לסעיף 5, לסעיף 6, לסעיף 7, לסעיף 8, לסעיף 9, לסעיף 10, לאחרי סעיף 10, לסעיף 11, לאחרי סעיף 11, לתוספת
- קבוצת יש עתיד · 139The Yesh Atid group proposed reservations seeking to limit the law's scope, add conditions and judicial review of the regularization procedures, and prevent blanket legalization of land seized unlawfully.Sections: לשם החוק, לסעיף 1, לסעיף 2, לסעיף 3, לסעיף 4, לסעיף 5, לסעיף 6, לסעיף 7, לסעיף 8, לסעיף 9, לסעיף 10, לסעיף 11, לאחרי סעיף 11, לתוספת
- בצלאל סמוטריץ' · 3Knesset Member Bezalel Smotrich proposed reservations to expand the definition of state consent and allow the purchase of rights instead of their seizure, in a manner that eases the regulation of settlement.Sections: לסעיף 1, לסעיף 2, לסעיף 3
Asked to speak: Israel Eichler (United Torah Judaism), Orly Levi-Abekasis (Yisrael Beytenu), Shuli Moalem-Refaeli (Jewish Home)
Proposers and reservation numbers are extracted automatically from the committee version, and the count is checked against the numbers printed in it. The descriptions are an automatic summary. Committee version for the second and third reading (PDF)
Reservations, sections and other votes (4)
In order. Votes on reservations and individual sections are shown separately from the vote on the bill as a whole.
- 6 February 2017 · Second reading · שם החוקהצעת חוק להסדרת ההתיישבות ביהודה והשומרון, התשע"ז-2017Bill for the Regulation of Settlement in Judea and Samaria, 2017auto60 for · 51 againstVote on sections of the bill
- 6 February 2017 · Second reading · הסתייגותהצעת חוק להסדרת ההתיישבות ביהודה והשומרון, התשע"ז-2017Bill for the Regulation of Settlement in Judea and Samaria, 2017auto60 for · 50 againstVote on a reservation (amendment)
- 6 February 2017 · Second reading · קריאה שנייההצעת חוק להסדרת ההתיישבות ביהודה והשומרון, התשע"ז-2017Bill for the Regulation of Settlement in Judea and Samaria, 2017auto60 for · 49 againstVote on sections of the bill
- 6 February 2017 · Second reading · קריאה שנייההצעת חוק להסדרת ההתיישבות ביהודה והשומרון, התשע"ז-2017Bill for the Regulation of Settlement in Judea and Samaria, 2017auto59 for · 50 againstVote on sections of the bill