Government bill · 19th Knesset · published as law 31 December 2013

חוק לשינוי סדרי עדיפויות לאומיים (תיקוני חקיקה להשגת יעדי התקציב לשנים 2013 ו-2014) (תיקון), התשע"ד-2013Law to Change National Budget Priorities (legislative amendments to Achieve Budget Targets for the Years 2013 and 2014) (Amendment), 2013 · automatic translation · suggest a correction

Status: התקבלה בקריאה שלישית

Topics: State budget · no asterisk — automatically from words in the title

What the sponsors propose

The bill cancels Section 40(23) of the Law for Changing National Priorities, 2013, which set an increase in income tax rates on individuals starting from the beginning of 2014, and amends accordingly the commencement provision in Section 42(b)(5) of the Law. According to the sponsors, updated assessments by the Ministry of Finance showed that interest expenses in the 2014 budget would be lower than planned by approximately 2 billion NIS, and that the reserve for complying with the expenditure limit could be reduced by approximately 1.3 billion NIS. According to the explanatory notes, this would enable the government to meet the 2014 deficit ceiling even without raising income tax rates, and in order to ease the tax burden on residents of the State of Israel, it is proposed to cancel the planned increase, in accordance with Government Decision No. 1014 of 8 December 2013.

automatic translation · suggest a correction

Hebrew original

הצעת החוק מבטלת את סעיף 40(23) לחוק לשינוי סדרי עדיפויות לאומיים, התשע״ג-2013, שקבע העלאת שיעורי מס ההכנסה על יחידים מתחילת שנת 2014, ומתקנת בהתאם את הוראת התחילה בסעיף 42(ב)(5) לחוק. לדברי המציעים, הערכות מצב מחודשות במשרד האוצר הראו כי הוצאות הריבית בתקציב 2014 תהיו נמוכות מהמתוכנן בכ-2 מיליארד שקלים חדשים, וכי ניתן להפחית את הרזרבה לעמידה במגבלת ההוצאה בכ-1.3 מיליארד שקלים חדשים. לפי דברי ההסבר, בכך תוכל הממשלה לעמוד בתקרת הגירעון לשנת 2014 גם בלא העלאת שיעורי מס ההכנסה, ולשם הקלה בנטל המס על תושבי מדינת ישראל מוצע לבטל את ההעלאה המתוכננת, בהתאם להחlטת ממשלה מס׳ 1014 מיום 8.12.2013.

An automatic summary of the explanatory notes written by the bill's sponsors. These are their arguments, not an official Knesset summary. · The bill on the Knesset website

Sponsors

Israel Eichler, Amnon Cohen

Readings

What was said in the plenum

The bill cancels the income tax increase that was set to take effect on 1 January 2014, following the discovery of revenue surpluses in the state treasury, and funds this by cutting ministries' budgetary reserves and saving on the interest budget. The debate between the sides centered on whether cancelling the tax increase constitutes responsible economic policy that benefits the broader public, or whether it is an unfair, populist move that mainly benefits high earners at the expense of the weak and the welfare systems.

automatic translation · suggest a correction

Hebrew original

הצעת החוק מבטלת את העלאת מס ההכנסה שהייתה אמורה להיכנס לתוקף ב-1 בינואר 2014, בעקבות עודפי הכנסות שהתגלו בקופת המדינה, ומממנת זאת בקיצוץ ברזרבות התקציביות של המשרדים ובחיסכון בתקציב הריבית. הוויכוח בין הצדדים נסב סביב השאלה האם ביטול העלאת המס מהווה מדיניות כלכלית אחראית ומיטיבה עם הציבור הרחב, או שמא מדובר במהלך פופוליסטי ולא הוגן שמיטיב בעיקר עם בעלי ההכנסות הגבוהות על חשבון החלשים ומערכות הרווחה.

Arguments for

  • Now that improved economic data have emerged (a decline in the deficit, higher-than-expected tax collection, and locked-in profits), it is possible and appropriate to ease the burden on the public and cancel the planned tax increase.
    Yair Lapid (Yesh Atid), Nissan Slomiansky (Jewish Home)
  • Canceling the tax increase eases the burden on the middle class and on all taxpayers, including relatively low earners who were supposed to pay an additional tax.
    Yair Lapid (Yesh Atid), Nissan Slomiansky (Jewish Home)
  • This is a responsible and balanced measure, funded in an orderly manner from the interest rate reduction and from ministries' reserves, and not at the expense of public services.
    Nissan Slomiansky (Jewish Home)
  • Any move that benefits the public should be welcomed and supported, and not every positive step should be turned into a political matter.
    Nissan Slomiansky (Jewish Home)

Arguments against

None were made.

Who spoke (21)
MemberFactionReadingsSpeechesIn the final vote
Yair LapidYesh Atid coalitionFirst reading2for
Erel MargalitLabor oppositionFirst reading2no record
Nissan SlomianskyJewish Home coalitionThird reading11for
Zehava GalonMeretz oppositionThird reading6against
Esawi FrejMeretz oppositionThird reading2against
Ilan GilonMeretz oppositionThird reading3against
Tamar ZandbergMeretz oppositionThird reading1against
Isaac HerzogLabor oppositionThird reading1against
Merav MichaeliLabor oppositionThird reading2against
Omer BarlevLabor oppositionThird reading2against
Avishay BravermanLabor oppositionThird reading2against
Itzik ShmuliLabor oppositionThird reading5against
Nachman ShaiLabor oppositionThird reading1against
Moshe MizrahiLabor oppositionThird reading3against
Michal BiranLabor oppositionThird reading1against
Nissim ZeevShas oppositionThird reading2against
Yitzhak CohenShas oppositionThird reading4no record
Moshe GafniUnited Torah Judaism oppositionThird reading4against
Uri MaklevUnited Torah Judaism oppositionThird reading2against
Israel EichlerUnited Torah Judaism oppositionThird reading5for
Eitan CabelLabor oppositionThird reading4against

An automatic summary of the plenum transcripts: the debate on the bill at every reading it was voted on. Arguments are given as the speakers made them; this is not an assessment. The list of speakers comes from the transcript, without a model. Transcripts of the sittings: 1, 2

Reservations to the second reading

3 reservations were filed: proposed changes to the text the committee brought to the second and third reading.

The reservations were intended to change the income tax brackets for individuals, alternatively to raise the VAT rate, to allocate a separate annual budget for fighting poverty and reducing gaps in education, and to cancel the tax changes set for 2014, which were described as mistaken.

automatic translation · suggest a correction

Hebrew original

ההסתייגויות נועדו לשנות את מדרגות מס ההכנסה על יחידים, לחלופין להעלות את שיעור המע״מ, להקצות תקציב שנתי נפרד למלחמה בעוני ולצמצום פערים בחינוך, ולבטל שינויי מס שנקבעו לשנת 2014 שהוגדרו כשגויים.

By faction

  • Labor opposition · 3 reservations · 15 members
  • United Torah Judaism opposition · 3 reservations · 7 members
  • Meretz opposition · 3 reservations · 6 members
  • Shas opposition · 3 reservations · 10 members

A joint reservation counts for every faction whose members filed it. 1 proposer was not matched to a member: listed under the groups, not counted by faction.

Who proposed what

Asked to speak: Mohammad Barakeh (Hadash), Hanna Swaid (Hadash), Dov Khenin (Hadash), Afou Agbaria (Hadash)

Proposers and reservation numbers are extracted automatically from the committee version, and the count is checked against the numbers printed in it. The descriptions are an automatic summary. Committee version for the second and third reading (PDF)

Reservations, sections and other votes (4)

In order. Votes on reservations and individual sections are shown separately from the vote on the bill as a whole.

Source: bill page in the Knesset legislation database ↗

Law to Change National Budget Priorities (legislative amendments to Achieve Budget Targets for the Years 2013 and 2014) (Amendment), 2013 · How the Knesset Votes