8 May 2012, 01:03 · 18th Knesset · vote no. 17750
הצעת חוק שיקים ללא כיסוי (תיקון מס' 9), התשע"ב-2012Bill on Uncovered Checks (Amendment No. 9), 2012 · automatic translation · suggest a correction
אישור החוק
Law passed: 9 for, 0 against
9 of 120 voted — official Knesset result
9 of 120 members voted. The plenum has no quorum: a decision passes by a simple majority of those voting. A special majority (61 votes) is needed only for no-confidence motions and some provisions of Basic Laws. Glossary →
What was put to the vote
«לקבל את הצעת החוק בקריאה שלישית»
Third reading: The final vote. A bill that passes its third reading becomes law. Glossary →
Bill: חוק שיקים ללא כיסוי (תיקון מס' 9), התשע"ב-2012Law on Uncovered Checks (Amendment No. 9), 2012auto
By party on the day of the vote
- for
- abstained
- against
Yisrael Beytenuישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמןcoalition4 for · 0 against — majority for
Jewish Homeהבית היהודי - מפד"ל החדשהcoalition1 for · 0 against — majority for
Likudהליכוד - אח"י בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלהcoalition1 for · 0 against — majority for
United Torah Judaismיהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל - דגל התורהcoalition1 for · 0 against — majority for
- Uri Maklevfor
Kadimaקדימה - עם ציפי לבני לראשות הממשלהopposition1 for · 0 against — majority for
Roll call (9)
Showing 9 of 9
| Member | Party at the time | Vote | Source code |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arieh Eldad | National Union | for | 7 |
| Daniel Hershkowitz | Jewish Home | for | 7 |
| Michael Eitan | Likud | for | 7 |
| Uri Maklev | United Torah Judaism | for | 7 |
| Moshe Mutz Matalon | Yisrael Beytenu | for | 7 |
| Fania Kirshenbaum | Yisrael Beytenu | for | 7 |
| David Rotem | Yisrael Beytenu | for | 7 |
| Lia Shemtov | Yisrael Beytenu | for | 7 |
| Majallie Whbee | Kadima | for | 7 |
Numbers and sources
- For
- 9
- Against
- 0
- Abstained
- 0
- Present, did not vote
- 0
Official result: 9 for, 0 against, 0 abstained — adopted. Taking that into account, the roll call matches the official result.
Only members with a record are counted. No record does not mean the member was absent.